Skip to content
Back to skills

Tcm Case Management

ASecurity

Test case management (TCM) across the five major platforms - TestRail, Xray, Zephyr Scale, Allure TestOps, and Qase - one tool-agnostic workflow for pre-execution case authoring and repository management: create and update cases, organise suites / sections / folders, attach structured steps with per-step expected results, link cases to requirements (Jira / Linear / GitHub), bulk import from CSV / JSON with idempotent re-runs, and sync from CI. The body works the workflow end to end against Te...

  • 10 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added October 12, 2026
testingpythongophpbashgitapi

Works with

  • cli
  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Pro scans all 7 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned October 12, 2026

npx -y skills add testland/qa --skill tcm-case-management --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Tcm Case Management?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Tcm Case Management
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/testland-tcm-case-management/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/testland-tcm-case-management)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: tcm-case-management
description: "Test case management (TCM) across the five major platforms - TestRail, Xray, Zephyr Scale, Allure TestOps, and Qase - one tool-agnostic workflow for pre-execution case authoring and repository management: create and update cases, organise suites / sections / folders, attach structured steps with per-step expected results, link cases to requirements (Jira / Linear / GitHub), bulk import from CSV / JSON with idempotent re-runs, and sync from CI. The body works the workflow end to end against TestRail's API v2; references/ carries the per-vendor API specifics (auth model, endpoints, steps shape, enums, rate limits) for all five tools. Use for test case management in any of the five TCMs - authoring cases from a spec, bulk-importing legacy cases, migrating between tools, or mass-editing a case repository. Do NOT use for posting test-run results (pass/fail): result sync is the qa-test-reporting plugin's *-integration surface."
---

# tcm-case-management

## Overview

Every mainstream TCM stores the same canonical case anatomy
(`test-case-anatomy-reference`: identifier, objective, preconditions, steps,
expected results, traceability) under different field names, containers, and
auth models. The workflow is identical across tools:

1. Authenticate with the platform's token scheme.
2. Create the container hierarchy (suite / section / folder).
3. Create cases with structured steps (one action + one expected result per step).
4. Discover tenant-specific enums (types, priorities, custom fields) at runtime.
5. Link cases to requirements for traceability.
6. List with pagination; bulk-import with idempotency and verification.
7. Sync from CI.

This skill works that workflow end to end using **TestRail** (the largest
install base) as the primary example, then routes the per-vendor API deltas
to references/.

**Differentiation vs result sync:** this skill operates on the *case
repository* - create, update, organise, traceability - a strictly
pre-execution concern. Posting test-run results (pass/fail, status updates)
is the qa-test-reporting plugin's `test-management-sync` / `test-management-sync`
/ `test-management-sync` surface.

## When to use

- Creating cases from a spec / requirement / acceptance criterion.
- Bulk-importing legacy cases from CSV / Excel.
- Migrating between TCM instances or tools (see also `tcm-migration-agent`).
- Programmatic case updates (mass-edit type, priority, tags).
- Case-repository quality scans (pair with `test-case-quality-critic`).

## Vendor routing table

| Vendor | Reference | Auth | Case container | Steps shape | Distinctive feature |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| **TestRail** | [references/testrail.md](references/testrail.md) | HTTP Basic (email + API key) | project → suite → section | `custom_steps_separated` array (Steps template) | Template system (Steps / Text / Exploratory); `refs` free-text requirement links |
| **Xray** (Jira) | [references/xray.md](references/xray.md) | OAuth client credentials → JWT (separate from Jira auth) | Jira issue with `issuetype: Test` | GraphQL `steps` (action / data / result) | Manual / Cucumber / Generic test types; `.feature` import; preconditions as linked issues |
| **Zephyr Scale** (Jira) | [references/zephyr-scale.md](references/zephyr-scale.md) | Bearer token (per-user) | project → folder | separate `/teststeps` endpoint, `OVERWRITE` / `APPEND` modes | Folder hierarchy per entity type; Jira-native links |
| **Allure TestOps** | [references/allure-testops.md](references/allure-testops.md) | Bearer token | project → suite + layer + feature | nested `scenario.steps` (sub-steps) | Links automated allure-results back to manual cases (`@allure.testcase`) |
| **Qase** | [references/qase-io.md](references/qase-io.md) | `Token` header (not `Authorization`) | project → suite | flat `steps` array (action / expected_result / data) | Shared steps reused across cases; inverted priority enum (1=High) |

Each reference carries the vendor's auth setup, create / update / list code,
bulk-import loop, migration field map, response shapes, rate limits, and
anti-patterns.

## The workflow, worked with TestRail

TestRail organises tests as `cases` inside `sections` inside `suites` inside
`projects`. The API v2 covers full CRUD on each plus templates, custom
fields, references, and types. Authentication is HTTP Basic with email + API
key per the TestRail support docs
(support.testrail.com/hc/en-us/articles/7077871398036-Cases -
Cloudflare-protected, cite by stable URL).

### Step 1 - Authenticate

```bash
export TR_BASE="https://your-tenant.testrail.io"
export TR_EMAIL="you@company.com"
export TR_KEY="<api-key-from-user-profile>"
```

```python
import requests, base64, os, json

auth = base64.b64encode(
    f"{os.environ['TR_EMAIL']}:{os.environ['TR_KEY']}".encode()
).decode()
HEADERS = {
    "Authorization": f"Basic {auth}",
    "Content-Type": "application/json",
}
BASE = os.environ["TR_BASE"]

def api(path, method="GET", body=None):
    url = f"{BASE}/index.php?/api/v2/{path.lstrip('/')}"
    r = requests.request(method, url, headers=HEADERS,
                         data=json.dumps(body) if body else None)
    r.raise_for_status()
    return r.json()
```

### Step 2 - Create a case with structured steps

`POST /index.php?/api/v2/add_case/:section_id`:

```python
def create_case(section_id, title, template_id=1, type_id=1, priority_id=2,
                preconditions=None, steps=None, refs=None):
    """
    template_id: 1=Steps, 2=Text, 3=Exploratory
    type_id: per project - discover via get_case_types
    priority_id: 1=Low, 2=Medium, 3=High, 4=Critical (default project enum)
    steps: list of {"content": "Action", "expected": "Outcome"}
    refs: comma-separated requirement IDs (e.g., "REQ-123,REQ-124")
    """
    body = {
        "title": title,
        "template_id": template_id,
        "type_id": type_id,
        "priority_id": priority_id,
    }
    if preconditions:
        body["custom_preconds"] = preconditions
    if steps and template_id == 1:
        body["custom_steps_separated"] = steps
    if refs:
        body["refs"] = refs
    return api(f"add_case/{section_id}", method="POST", body=body)

steps = [
    {"content": "Navigate to /login", "expected": "Login form rendered"},
    {"content": "Enter alice@example.com + correct password",
     "expected": "Submit button enabled"},
    {"content": "Click Submit",
     "expected": "Redirected to /dashboard within 2 s"},
]
new_case = create_case(
    section_id=42,
    title="Login with valid credentials redirects to dashboard",
    template_id=1,
    steps=steps,
    preconditions="User `alice@example.com` exists; password set to 'pw123'.",
    refs="REQ-AUTH-001",
)
print(new_case["id"])  # e.g., 1234
```

One action per step, each paired with its expected result - the per-step
result tracking is why steps go in the structured field, never a text blob.

### Step 3 - Discover tenant enums at runtime

Each tenant defines its own custom fields, case types, and priorities;
discover their IDs at runtime rather than hard-coding them:

```python
fields = api("get_case_fields")   # system_name, label, type_id per field
types = api("get_case_types")     # id + name per case type
prios = api("get_priorities")     # id + name per priority
type_ids = {t["name"]: t["id"] for t in types}
prio_ids = {p["name"]: p["id"] for p in prios}
```

This discovery step exists in every vendor: Zephyr's `statusName` /
`priorityName` enums are project-scoped, Allure TestOps layers / features are
per-project, Qase types are configurable. Never hard-code the integers.

### Step 4 - Update, get, and list with pagination

```python
def update_case(case_id, **fields):
    return api(f"update_case/{case_id}", method="POST", body=fields)

update_case(1234, refs="REQ-AUTH-001,REQ-AUTH-002")  # bulk re-tag

case = api(f"get_case/1234")
# List with pagination:
cases = []
offset = 0
while True:
    page = api(f"get_cases/{project_id}&suite_id={suite_id}"
               f"&limit=250&offset={offset}")
    cases.extend(page.get("cases", page) if isinstance(page, dict) else page)
    if isinstance(page, dict) and page.get("size", 0) < 250:
        break
    offset += 250
```

Newer TestRail versions return `{"offset", "limit", "size", "_links", "cases": [...]}`;
older return a bare array. Handle both. Every vendor paginates differently
(Zephyr `isLast`, Allure `last`, Qase `entities < limit`) - see the
references.

### Step 5 - Bulk import from CSV, idempotently

Build name-to-id maps once, then inside the loop check for an existing case
by title before create so re-runs stay idempotent. `get_cases` accepts
`filter` (substring match on title):

```python
import csv

created, skipped = [], []
for row in csv.DictReader(open("legacy-cases.csv")):
    title = row["title"]
    existing = api(f"get_cases/{project_id}&suite_id={suite_id}"
                   f"&filter={requests.utils.quote(title[:60])}")
    if existing.get("cases"):
        skipped.append((title, existing["cases"][0]["id"]))
        continue  # already present; skip and log
    steps = [
        {"content": s, "expected": e}
        for s, e in zip(row["steps"].split("|"), row["expected"].split("|"))
    ]
    case = create_case(
        section_id=int(row["section_id"]),
        title=title,
        template_id=1,
        type_id=type_ids[row["type"]],
        priority_id=prio_ids[row["priority"]],
        preconditions=row.get("preconditions"),
        steps=steps,
        refs=row.get("refs"),
    )
    created.append(case["id"])
```

**Verify:** assert `len(created) + len(skipped)` equals the row count before
declaring the import done; a shortfall means a row raised - inspect it, fix
the source row, and re-run (already-created cases are skipped by the title
check). On rate-limited vendors (Xray, Zephyr, Qase throttle around 60
req/min) add a `time.sleep(1)` per row and back off further on 429.

### Step 6 - CI sync

Sync cases from a `tests/` directory layout. One pattern: each spec file has
front-matter declaring the case ID; on PR merge, post updates back:

```yaml
- name: Sync test cases to TestRail
  env:
    TR_BASE: ${{ vars.TR_BASE }}
    TR_EMAIL: ${{ vars.TR_EMAIL }}
    TR_KEY: ${{ secrets.TR_KEY }}
  run: python scripts/sync-testrail.py
```

Have the sync script exit non-zero when any case fails to sync, and verify
the repository case count matches the source count after the run - a
mismatch means a silent partial sync.

## Parsing results

Create responses return the full case object (`id`, `created_on`,
`updated_on`, ...). Permalink:

```python
url = f"{BASE}/index.php?/cases/view/{case_id}"
```

Per-vendor response shapes and permalink formats are in each reference.

## Anti-patterns (cross-vendor)

| Anti-pattern | Why it fails | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Hard-coded type / priority / status IDs | Enums differ per project and tenant | Discover at runtime (Step 3) |
| Steps as a single text blob | Per-step results unavailable | Use the structured steps field (Step 2) |
| Plain title with no requirement refs | Coverage reports show 0% requirement coverage | Always link cases to requirement IDs |
| Creating cases in the root container | Hard to find later; organisation chaos | Always pick a section / folder / suite; create as needed |
| No pagination on list endpoints | Misses cases beyond the first page | Loop per the vendor's pagination contract (Step 4) |
| Storing API keys in code | Token leak | Environment variable / CI secret store |
| Bulk-create without throttling or idempotency | 429s; duplicate cases on re-run | Rate-limit + title-check pattern (Step 5) |
| Vendor-specific case structure as the authoring source | Migration cost exploded | Author in the canonical anatomy (`test-case-anatomy-reference`); let the tracker mapping be additive |

## Limitations

- **Vendor docs behind Cloudflare.** All five vendors' API docs require
  browser validation; this skill cites by stable URL. Authenticated API
  calls work fine (different surface).
- **Custom-field discipline varies.** Tenants define different custom
  fields; scripts must discover field IDs at runtime.
- **Requirement refs are only as valid as the reconciliation.** Most TCMs
  don't validate that referenced IDs exist in the tracker; pair with
  `traceability-matrix-builder`.
- **Bulk operations are mostly sequential.** Only Xray has a true bulk
  endpoint; elsewhere loop + throttle.
- **Cloud APIs only.** The references cover each vendor's cloud API; Server
  / Data Center variants (Xray DC, Zephyr DC) have divergent REST shapes.

## References

- TestRail API v2 Cases reference -
  support.testrail.com/hc/en-us/articles/7077871398036-Cases
  (Cloudflare-protected; cite by stable URL).
- Per-vendor API references:
  [references/testrail.md](references/testrail.md),
  [references/xray.md](references/xray.md),
  [references/zephyr-scale.md](references/zephyr-scale.md),
  [references/allure-testops.md](references/allure-testops.md),
  [references/qase-io.md](references/qase-io.md).
- Sibling references:
  `test-case-anatomy-reference` - the canonical case anatomy + tracker schema map.
- Sibling-plugin neighbours:
  `test-management-sync`, `test-management-sync`, `test-management-sync`
  (qa-test-reporting plugin) - post-execution result sync, not case authoring.

Files in this skill

  • .tessl-plugin/plugin.json1 KB
  • SKILL.md13.1 KB
  • references/allure-testops.md8.3 KB
  • references/qase-io.md9.5 KB
  • references/testrail.md3.3 KB
  • references/xray.md8.4 KB
  • references/zephyr-scale.md8.2 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.