Skip to content
Back to skills

Policy As Code Runner

ASecurity

Configures policy-as-code testing using OPA / Conftest / Cedar - authors policies in Rego (OPA's language), runs Conftest against Kubernetes manifests / Terraform plans / Dockerfiles / arbitrary structured data, integrates with CI for PR-time policy gates. Per OPA's docs: \"an open source, general-purpose policy engine that unifies policy enforcement across the stack.\" Use to express + enforce custom policies (cost limits, tagging requirements, security baselines) that Checkov / tfsec / KICS...

  • 10 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added October 12, 2026
testinggobashexpressdockerkubernetesawsterraformtestinggitapi

Works with

  • cli
  • api

Security analysis

A96/100
  • mediumUses curl or wget to download content

Pro scans all 2 files and shows the line behind each finding

Scanned October 12, 2026

npx -y skills add testland/qa --skill policy-as-code-runner --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Policy As Code Runner?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Policy As Code Runner
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/testland-policy-as-code-runner/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/testland-policy-as-code-runner)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: policy-as-code-runner
description: "Configures policy-as-code testing using OPA / Conftest / Cedar - authors policies in Rego (OPA's language), runs Conftest against Kubernetes manifests / Terraform plans / Dockerfiles / arbitrary structured data, integrates with CI for PR-time policy gates. Per OPA's docs: \"an open source, general-purpose policy engine that unifies policy enforcement across the stack.\" Use to express + enforce custom policies (cost limits, tagging requirements, security baselines) that Checkov / tfsec / KICS don't cover."
---

# policy-as-code-runner

## Overview

[opa]: https://www.openpolicyagent.org/docs/

**Conftest** is a CLI that uses OPA ([opa-docs][opa]) to test
structured configuration files (Kubernetes manifests, Terraform
plans, Dockerfiles, etc.) against Rego policies. This skill
covers Conftest invocation + Rego policy authoring as the custom
policy layer alongside Checkov / tfsec / KICS (which carry
built-in checks).

## When to use

- The team has custom policies that off-the-shelf scanners
  (Checkov / tfsec / KICS) don't cover (e.g., "all production
  resources must have a cost-center tag").
- A Kubernetes admission policy is needed (OPA Gatekeeper).
- Dockerfiles need policy review (no `:latest` tags, no `apt-get
  upgrade`, etc.).
- A multi-language IaC stack needs unified policy enforcement.

## Step 1 - Install Conftest

```bash
# macOS
brew install conftest

# Or download binary
curl -LO https://github.com/open-policy-agent/conftest/releases/latest/download/conftest_<version>_Linux_x86_64.tar.gz
```

## Step 2 - Author a policy in Rego

```rego
# policies/kubernetes/required_labels.rego
package main

# All pods must have these labels
required_labels := {"app", "version", "owner"}

deny[msg] {
    input.kind == "Deployment"
    label := required_labels[_]
    not input.spec.template.metadata.labels[label]
    msg := sprintf("Deployment '%s' missing required label '%s'", [input.metadata.name, label])
}

# All deployments must specify resource limits
deny[msg] {
    input.kind == "Deployment"
    container := input.spec.template.spec.containers[_]
    not container.resources.limits.memory
    msg := sprintf("Container '%s' in deployment '%s' missing memory limit", [container.name, input.metadata.name])
}

deny[msg] {
    input.kind == "Deployment"
    container := input.spec.template.spec.containers[_]
    not container.resources.limits.cpu
    msg := sprintf("Container '%s' in deployment '%s' missing CPU limit", [container.name, input.metadata.name])
}
```

The `deny` rule pattern: each `deny[msg]` rule that holds adds a
message to the deny set. If `deny` is non-empty, the test fails.

## Step 3 - Run Conftest

```bash
# Test a single manifest
conftest test deployment.yaml

# Test all manifests
conftest test manifests/

# With specific policy directory
conftest test deployment.yaml --policy ./policies/

# JSON output for CI parsing
conftest test deployment.yaml --output json
```

## Step 4 - Test against Helm chart output

```bash
helm template myrelease charts/mychart/ -f values.yaml | conftest test -
```

The chart renders to manifests; Conftest validates them.

## Step 5 - Test against Terraform plan

```bash
terraform plan -out=plan.tfplan
terraform show -json plan.tfplan > plan.json
conftest test plan.json --policy policies/terraform/
```

```rego
# policies/terraform/cost_center_tag.rego
package main

deny[msg] {
    resource := input.resource_changes[_]
    resource.type == "aws_instance"
    not resource.change.after.tags.cost_center
    msg := sprintf("EC2 instance '%s' missing cost_center tag", [resource.address])
}
```

## Step 6 - Test against Dockerfile

```rego
# policies/dockerfile/no_latest.rego
package main

deny[msg] {
    input[i].Cmd == "from"
    val := input[i].Value
    contains(val[0], ":latest")
    msg := sprintf("Avoid :latest tag in FROM (line %d)", [i])
}

deny[msg] {
    input[i].Cmd == "run"
    val := input[i].Value[0]
    contains(val, "apt-get upgrade")
    msg := sprintf("Avoid 'apt-get upgrade' (line %d) - pin specific package versions", [i])
}
```

```bash
conftest test Dockerfile
```

## Step 7 - Author tests for policies

Policies themselves should be tested:

```rego
# policies/kubernetes/required_labels_test.rego
package main

test_deployment_missing_labels {
    deny[_] with input as {
        "kind": "Deployment",
        "metadata": {"name": "test"},
        "spec": {"template": {"metadata": {"labels": {}}}}
    }
}

test_deployment_with_all_labels {
    count(deny) == 0 with input as {
        "kind": "Deployment",
        "metadata": {"name": "test"},
        "spec": {"template": {"metadata": {"labels": {"app": "x", "version": "1.0", "owner": "team"}}}, "spec": {"containers": [{"resources": {"limits": {"memory": "512Mi", "cpu": "500m"}}}]}}
    }
}
```

```bash
opa test policies/
```

## Step 8 - CI integration

```yaml
jobs:
  policy:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v5
      - run: |
          curl -L https://github.com/open-policy-agent/conftest/releases/download/v0.50.0/conftest_0.50.0_Linux_x86_64.tar.gz | tar xz
          # user-owned bin dir on PATH: no sudo, no write to /usr/local/bin
          mkdir -p "$HOME/.local/bin" && mv conftest "$HOME/.local/bin/"
          echo "$HOME/.local/bin" >> "$GITHUB_PATH"
      - name: Test policies
        run: opa test policies/
      - name: Conftest manifests
        run: conftest test manifests/ --policy policies/
      - name: Conftest Helm
        run: helm template myrelease charts/mychart/ -f values.yaml | conftest test - --policy policies/
      - name: Conftest Terraform
        run: |
          terraform plan -out=plan.tfplan
          terraform show -json plan.tfplan > plan.json
          conftest test plan.json --policy policies/terraform/
```

## Step 9 - Bundle policies for OPA Gatekeeper (Kubernetes admission)

For runtime enforcement (vs PR-time):

```yaml
apiVersion: templates.gatekeeper.sh/v1
kind: ConstraintTemplate
metadata:
  name: requiredlabels
spec:
  crd:
    spec:
      names: { kind: RequiredLabels }
  targets:
    - target: admission.k8s.gatekeeper.sh
      rego: |
        # Same Rego from Step 2
```

Cluster admins install Gatekeeper; the constraint blocks Deployments
that violate the policy at admission time.

## Anti-patterns

| Anti-pattern                                                          | Why it fails                                                              | Fix |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----|
| Untested policies                                                      | Policy bugs let bad config through; over-strict policies block good config. | `opa test` against test fixtures (Step 7). |
| Policies in production without PR-time gating                         | Surprises at admission time; deployments fail.                          | CI gate first (Step 8); Gatekeeper second. |
| One mega-policy file                                                   | Hard to reason about; merge conflicts.                                    | Per-domain policy files. |
| Rego complexity for simple checks                                      | Hard to maintain; Rego learning curve.                                   | Use Checkov / tfsec for built-in checks; OPA for custom. |
| Skipping the negation tests                                            | Policy may pass for the wrong reason.                                   | Test both deny and not-deny cases (Step 7). |

## Limitations

- **Rego learning curve.** New language; per [opa-docs][opa] it's
  "purpose-built" but takes time to master.
- **Per-tool integration varies.** Conftest wraps OPA cleanly;
  some tools have native OPA integration, others don't.
- **Policy proliferation.** Like step libraries (per `bdd-step-library-curator` in the qa-bdd plugin),
  policies can multiply; periodic review needed.

## References

- [opa][opa] - OPA overview, Rego language, common applications,
  CNCF graduated status.
- Conftest at `conftest.dev`.
- `$GITHUB_PATH` for a user-owned install dir in CI:
  [GitHub Actions: adding a system path](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/reference/workflows-and-actions/workflow-commands#adding-a-system-path).
- OPA Gatekeeper at `open-policy-agent.github.io/gatekeeper/`.
- `checkov-policy`,
  `trivy-config` - sister scanners with
  built-in checks (use these first; OPA for custom).

Files in this skill

  • .tessl-plugin/plugin.json648 B
  • SKILL.md8.3 KB

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.