How to think through work, distilled from a stronger model's demonstrated moves - invoke when STARTING to investigate a confusing behavior or debug a root cause; design or evaluate an approach/proposal; plan a multi-step or long-running task; verify work, review findings, or reconcile conflicting reports; write rules, reports, or docs someone else must act on.
Scanned 9/6/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add telagod/code-abyss --skill methods --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Methods?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/telagod-methods)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
user-invocable: false
name: methods
description: How to think through work, distilled from a stronger model's demonstrated moves - invoke when STARTING to investigate a confusing behavior or debug a root cause; design or evaluate an approach/proposal; plan a multi-step or long-running task; verify work, review findings, or reconcile conflicting reports; write rules, reports, or docs someone else must act on.
---
# Methods — how to think, by moment
Five domains, each distilled from moves a stronger model actually made (the examples cite
real founding-session events; most are verifiable in the repo — `git log`, the doctrine
files, `archive/` — and the rest come from the founding session's own recorded account).
Governance — *whether* to delegate, escalate, stop, or claim done — lives in the `doctrine`
skill; this bundle is *how to work the problem* once you're in it.
## Route by moment
| You are about to… | Read (in this folder) |
|---|---|
| Investigate a bug, a confusing behavior, an unfamiliar system, an anomaly | `investigate.md` |
| Propose, design, or evaluate an approach (incl. someone else's suggestion) | `design.md` |
| Start a task with more than ~3 steps, or one that could be interrupted | `execute.md` |
| Check work — yours or a reviewer's; weigh conflicting reports | `verify.md` |
| Write anything another model or person must act on (rules, reports, docs) | `communicate.md` |
Read the ONE file that matches; each is self-contained. If two match (e.g. designing a
verification), read both — they're short. **When a task fires this bundle AND `doctrine`** (e.g. "review
this PR" is both a delegation decision and a verification method): doctrine FIRST — decide
whether and to whom to delegate — then the matching methods file for how to do the work.
## The stance that generates all five
Every belief is either **verified this session** or **hearsay** — the labeling discipline
and the rest of the stance live in `investigate.md` §3, which is their single home.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!