Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsBlogPro
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges
  • Chrome Extension

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Issue

ASecurity

GitHub issue creation skill. Analyzes the entire codebase impact based on user request, then creates a structured issue with AI-verified/human-judgment-needed/caution sections. /issue "issue description" Trigger: "/issue", "이슈 만들어", "issue 만들자", "깃헙 이슈"

174 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/9/2026
testinggobashgitsecurityperformancedocumentation

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/9/2026

$npx -y skills add team-attention/hoyeon --skill issue --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Issue?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Issue
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/team-attention-issue/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/team-attention-issue)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: issue
description: |
  GitHub issue creation skill. Analyzes the entire codebase impact based on user request,
  then creates a structured issue with AI-verified/human-judgment-needed/caution sections.
  /issue "issue description"
  Trigger: "/issue", "이슈 만들어", "issue 만들자", "깃헙 이슈"
allowed_tools:
  - Read
  - Grep
  - Glob
  - Bash
  - Agent
  - AskUserQuestion
validate_prompt: |
  Must complete with one of:
  1. GitHub issue created (URL returned)
  2. User cancelled after preview
  Must NOT: create issue without user confirmation, skip impact analysis.
---

# /issue — Structured GitHub Issue Creator

Investigate the codebase based on the user's request and create a GitHub issue with clearly defined confidence boundaries.

## Input

The text the user typed after `/issue` is the original request. Preserve it verbatim.

Examples:
- `/issue Duplicate Shorts URL fetches in YouTube subscription feed`
- `/issue Add notification settings tab to Settings page`
- `/issue Scheduler occasionally runs twice`

If the input is too vague (e.g., "there's a bug"), ask ONE clarifying question. Otherwise, start investigating immediately.

## Phase 1: Impact Analysis

Perform a **full impact analysis** based on the user's request. Use Agent to investigate in parallel.

### What to Investigate

Launch agents in parallel where possible:

1. **Related code exploration** — Identify files, functions, and modules directly related to the request
2. **Dependency analysis** — Where is this code referenced, and which modules are affected
3. **Existing test coverage** — Whether related tests exist and what they cover
4. **Related issues/history** — Relevant change history from git log, known issues

### Classifying Findings

Classify all findings into three confidence levels:

#### ✅ AI Verified
**Objective facts confirmed through code exploration.** No need for human re-verification.
- Function/file locations, call relationships
- Whether tests exist
- Current behavior (as read directly from code)
- Relevant config values, environment variables

#### 🤔 Decision Required
**Decision points that AI cannot make on your behalf.**
- Trade-off choices (performance vs. accuracy, UX vs. security, etc.)
- Business logic decisions
- Scope decisions (how much to fix)
- Priority judgment

#### ⚠️ Human Verify
**Risks and caveats AI may have missed.**
- Potential side effects
- Risks from production environment differences
- External service dependencies
- Whether data migration is needed
- Areas AI could not verify (external systems, real user data, etc.)

## Phase 2: Preview & Confirm

After investigation, show the user a preview of the issue body.

### Issue Body Template

```markdown
## Request

> {original text the user typed after /issue, verbatim}

## Impact Analysis

### Related Code
- `file:line` — description
- ...

### Scope of Impact
- List of affected modules/features

---

## ✅ AI Verified
> Facts confirmed through code exploration. No further verification needed.

- [ ] Confirmed fact 1
- [ ] Confirmed fact 2

## 🤔 Decision Required
> Decision points requiring human judgment.

- [ ] Decision point 1 — Option A vs B, considerations
- [ ] Decision point 2

## ⚠️ Human Verify
> Risks AI may have missed. Needs human review before and/or after implementation.

- [ ] Verification point 1 — why this needs checking
- [ ] Verification point 2
```

After showing the preview, confirm with AskUserQuestion:

```
AskUserQuestion(
  question: "Should I create a GitHub issue with this content?",
  header: "Issue Preview",
  options: [
    { label: "Create", description: "Create the issue as-is" },
    { label: "Edit then create", description: "I want to make changes first" },
    { label: "Cancel", description: "Do not create the issue" }
  ]
)
```

- **Create** → Proceed to Phase 3
- **Edit then create** → Incorporate user feedback, then show preview again
- **Cancel** → "Issue creation cancelled." → Stop

## Phase 3: Create Issue

Create the issue with `gh issue create`.

```bash
gh issue create --title "Issue title" --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
Issue body
EOF
)"
```

### Title Rules
- Under 70 characters
- Use a prefix: `feat:`, `fix:`, `refactor:`, `chore:`, etc. (based on content)
- English or Korean OK

### Label Auto-mapping

Based on the issue content, add matching labels via the `--label` flag using the table below.
Multiple labels allowed. If no match, create without labels.

| Issue type | Label |
|-----------|------|
| Bug, error, broken behavior | `bug` |
| New feature, addition, improvement | `enhancement` |
| Documentation related | `documentation` |
| Question, investigation, needs clarification | `question` |

After creation, return the issue URL to the user.

## Hard Rules

1. **Investigate first** — Never create an issue without investigation
2. **Confirm first** — Never create an issue without user confirmation
3. **Preserve original** — The user's original request must be included verbatim in the "Request" section
4. **Facts only** — AI Verified contains only things directly confirmed from code. No speculation.
5. **Be honest** — Anything unverified goes into Human Verify. Never pretend to know.
6. **Keep it concise** — Do not let the issue body grow unnecessarily long

## Checklist Before Stopping

- [ ] Codebase impact analysis completed
- [ ] Findings classified into three confidence levels
- [ ] User's original request included verbatim
- [ ] User reviewed the preview
- [ ] `gh issue create` executed and URL returned (or user cancelled)

Attribution

team-attentionteam-attention
View sourceSee grades on GitHubMore from team-attention →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Your tool, in front of Claude Code builders.

3 founder slots · $299/mo · GSC-verified traffic · sponsors can never buy grades.

See placements

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Your tool, in front of Claude Code builders.

3 founder slots · $299/mo · GSC-verified traffic · sponsors can never buy grades.

See placements

Related Skills

Screen Reader Testing

Practical guide to testing web applications with screen readers for comprehensive accessibility validation.

400511 votes

Tdd Workflow

在编写新功能、修复错误或重构代码时使用此技能。强制执行测试驱动开发,包含单元测试、集成测试和端到端测试,覆盖率超过80%。

2456590 votes

Python Testing

使用pytest、TDD方法、夹具、模拟、参数化和覆盖率要求的Python测试策略。

2456590 votes

Eval Harness

克劳德代码会话的正式评估框架,实施评估驱动开发(EDD)原则

2456590 votes

Golang Testing

Go测试模式包括表格驱动测试、子测试、基准测试、模糊测试和测试覆盖率。遵循TDD方法论,采用地道的Go实践。

2456590 votes
View all in testing →