Assess one product or operations domain into ranked findings for a named go/no-go, hold, or risk decision. Use when the user asks for a domain review or assessment that no dedicated review listing covers. Do not use to design the system under review, critique a single claim, or synthesize a literature.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Review Domain?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/sylphxai-review-domain)
---
name: review-domain
description: "Assess one product or operations domain into ranked findings for a named go/no-go, hold, or risk decision. Use when the user asks for a domain review or assessment that no dedicated review listing covers. Do not use to design the system under review, critique a single claim, or synthesize a literature."
---
# Review Domain
One domain, ranked findings for a named decision. Frame the candidate and decision; prefer primary systems over memory; separate fact, inference, and unknown; rank findings; stop when more reading will not change the assessment. Unknowns stay unknown; they are not findings.
Open [the shared review rhythm](references/review-playbook-skeleton.md) when the assessment needs depth. After several domain reviews of the same candidate, open [multi-review synthesis](references/multi-review-synthesis.md).
Use the dedicated review listing when one exists. Use `analyze-critically` for a single claim. Use `synthesize-evidence-brief` for multi-source research rather than a product go/no-go.
