Decide whether a performance gap is a training problem or a job-design problem. Use when the user mentions training needs, skills gap, do they need training, needs analysis, or asks for a training needs note. Education and training skill by Yasir Jilani.
Scanned 9/30/2026
npx -y skills add SYasJ/claude-business-skills --skill training-needs-analysis --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Training Needs Analysis?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/syasj-training-needs-analysis)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.
---
name: training-needs-analysis
description: "Decide whether a performance gap is a training problem or a job-design problem. Use when the user mentions training needs, skills gap, do they need training, needs analysis, or asks for a training needs note. Education and training skill by Yasir Jilani."
license: MIT
compatibility: Agent Skills standard. No network access, extra packages, or credentials required.
metadata:
author: Yasir Jilani
version: "1.0.0"
domain: education
---
<!-- GENERATED FILE - edits here are overwritten by scripts/generate.py.
Edit the 'training-needs-analysis' entry in source/, then run:
python3 scripts/generate.py && python3 scripts/validate.py
See CONTRIBUTING.md. -->
# Training Needs Analysis
Decide whether a performance gap is a training problem or a job-design problem.
## When to use this skill
Use this skill when the user:
- training needs
- skills gap
- do they need training
- needs analysis
## When not to use this skill
- The user wants a different domain's specialist skill.
- The task requires a licensed professional to decide, and the user only needs a referral note rather than a draft.
- The request asks you to deceive, evade a control, or hide material facts.
## Professional boundary
Learning design supports the instructor. Do not complete graded work for a student or help anyone cheat. Do not invent accreditation requirements.
## Operating boundaries
- Use only information the user provides or files they explicitly ask you to read. Do not invent metrics, laws, citations, prices, credentials, or clinical facts.
- Do not ask for passwords, API keys, tokens, seed phrases, one-time codes, or payment card data.
- Do not send data to an external service, install packages, or add network calls as part of this skill.
- Separate facts, assumptions, and recommendations. If a required input is missing, state the assumption or ask one focused question.
- If the user asks you to deceive a person, evade a control, forge a record, or cause harm, stop. Offer a legitimate alternative.
- Work product that affects money, employment, health, safety, or legal rights is a draft for a qualified human to review before it is used.
## Inputs to collect
- The performance gap
- Evidence
- What training already exists
- Constraints on the job
## Workflow
### 1. Step 1
Describe the gap as observable work.
### 2. Step 2
Ask whether people could do the task with enough time and tools. If not, training is the wrong first fix.
### 3. Step 3
If the skill is missing, define the smallest training that builds it.
### 4. Step 4
Name who needs it and who does not, so you do not train the whole company by habit.
### 5. Step 5
State how you will know the gap closed.
### 6. Step 6
Recommend a job-design fix when the evidence points there.
## Output
Deliver a **training needs note**.
- Purpose of this training needs note, in two sentences.
- Facts the user supplied, listed separately from assumptions.
- The work itself, in the structure the workflow names.
- Open questions, risks, and the single next action with an owner.
- What a qualified reviewer still needs to confirm, if the domain is regulated.
## Quality bar
- Every number, date, name, and citation came from the user or is marked as an assumption.
- The artifact can be used without reading this skill again.
- Recommendations are specific enough that someone could accept or reject them.
- Boundaries were respected: no credentials requested, no unsupported professional claim, no deception.
## Example
### Scenario
Mark Ellison, program chair at Riverbend College in Lethbridge, needs a training needs note by 30 September 2026. Errors rose after a tool change that hides the needed field, and the draft recommends a full-day course.
### Example data
```text
From: Mark Ellison, program chair
Organization: Riverbend College, Lethbridge
Date: 14 September 2026
Needed by: 30 September 2026
Errors rose after a tool change that hides the needed field, and the draft recommends a full-day course.
The performance gap: Module 2 lesson plan is missing a source
Evidence: one PDF, 2 pages, dated 14 September 2026
What training already exists: Thursday workshop, last reviewed 14 September 2026. No owner named since
Constraints on the job: no extra headcount, and no result that is not in this file
```
### Example outcome
**Training needs note**
To: Mark Ellison, program chair, Riverbend College
Date: 14 September 2026 · Needed by: 30 September 2026
**Decision**
Fixes the field first and limits training to the people who still lack the skill.
**What the file supports**
| Input | Value | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| The performance gap | Module 2 lesson plan is missing a source | Needs confirmation |
| Evidence | one PDF, 2 pages, dated 14 September 2026 | Carried into the draft |
| What training already exists | Thursday workshop, last reviewed 14 September 2026. No owner named since | Carried into the draft |
| Constraints on the job | no extra headcount, and no result that is not in this file | Needs confirmation |
**How this draft was built**
**1. Describe the gap as observable work**
**2. Ask whether people could do the task with enough time and tools. If not, training is the wrong first fix**
**3. If the skill is missing, define the smallest training that builds it**
**4. Name who needs it and who does not, so you do not train the whole company by habit**
**5. State how you will know the gap closed**
**Deliberately not done**
- Training as the answer to a tooling or workload problem.
- A course with no success check.
- Training everyone by default.
**Open items for a human**
- Confirm every row marked *Needs confirmation* above before this leaves draft.
- Anything absent from the file stayed absent. No figure, date, or name was supplied from outside it.
Next: Mark Ellison by 30 September 2026. This is a draft, not a sign-off.
## Anti-patterns
- Training as the answer to a tooling or workload problem
- A course with no success check
- Training everyone by default
## Related skills
- `learning-path`
- `lesson-plan`
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!