Recommend the smallest set of skills in this library for a task, and say what not to load. Use when the user mentions which skill, skill finder, what skill should I use, help me pick a workflow, or asks for a skill recommendation. Skill library skill by Yasir Jilani.
Scanned 9/30/2026
npx -y skills add SYasJ/claude-business-skills --skill skill-finder --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Skill Finder?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/syasj-skill-finder)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.
---
name: skill-finder
description: "Recommend the smallest set of skills in this library for a task, and say what not to load. Use when the user mentions which skill, skill finder, what skill should I use, help me pick a workflow, or asks for a skill recommendation. Skill library skill by Yasir Jilani."
license: MIT
compatibility: Agent Skills standard. No network access, extra packages, or credentials required.
metadata:
author: Yasir Jilani
version: "1.0.0"
domain: library
---
<!-- GENERATED FILE - edits here are overwritten by scripts/generate.py.
Edit the 'skill-finder' entry in source/, then run:
python3 scripts/generate.py && python3 scripts/validate.py
See CONTRIBUTING.md. -->
# Skill Finder
Recommend the smallest set of skills in this library for a task, and say what not to load.
## When to use this skill
Use this skill when the user:
- which skill
- skill finder
- what skill should I use
- help me pick a workflow
## When not to use this skill
- The user wants a different domain's specialist skill.
- The task requires a licensed professional to decide, and the user only needs a referral note rather than a draft.
- The request asks you to deceive, evade a control, or hide material facts.
## Professional boundary
Library skills help you choose, write, and trust agent skills. They do not grant extra permissions or weaken safety rules.
## Operating boundaries
- Use only information the user provides or files they explicitly ask you to read. Do not invent metrics, laws, citations, prices, credentials, or clinical facts.
- Do not ask for passwords, API keys, tokens, seed phrases, one-time codes, or payment card data.
- Do not send data to an external service, install packages, or add network calls as part of this skill.
- Separate facts, assumptions, and recommendations. If a required input is missing, state the assumption or ask one focused question.
- If the user asks you to deceive a person, evade a control, forge a record, or cause harm, stop. Offer a legitimate alternative.
- Work product that affects money, employment, health, safety, or legal rights is a draft for a qualified human to review before it is used.
## Inputs to collect
- The task
- The domain
- Whether a regulated professional must review
- Skills already loaded
## Workflow
### 1. Step 1
Restate the task in one sentence.
### 2. Step 2
Pick the one skill whose output matches the task. Add a second only if the task truly crosses domains.
### 3. Step 3
Prefer a specialist skill over a general strategy skill when the output is a defined artifact.
### 4. Step 4
Say which nearby skill is the wrong one and why.
### 5. Step 5
If the task asks for deception, evasion, or harm, do not route to a skill. Refuse and offer a legitimate alternative.
### 6. Step 6
Remind the user that descriptions load for installed skills, so they should install a domain rather than the whole library.
## Output
Deliver a **skill recommendation**.
- Purpose of this skill recommendation, in two sentences.
- Facts the user supplied, listed separately from assumptions.
- The work itself, in the structure the workflow names.
- Open questions, risks, and the single next action with an owner.
- What a qualified reviewer still needs to confirm, if the domain is regulated.
## Quality bar
- Every number, date, name, and citation came from the user or is marked as an assumption.
- The artifact can be used without reading this skill again.
- Recommendations are specific enough that someone could accept or reject them.
- Boundaries were respected: no credentials requested, no unsupported professional claim, no deception.
## Example
### Scenario
Yasir Jilani, author at Practice Skills in Airdrie, needs a skill recommendation by 30 September 2026. A user asks for a cash view and also wants a full corporate strategy loaded.
### Example data
```text
From: Yasir Jilani, author
Organization: Practice Skills, Airdrie
Date: 14 September 2026
Needed by: 30 September 2026
A user asks for a cash view and also wants a full corporate strategy loaded.
The task: A user asks for a cash view and also wants a full corporate strategy loaded. Stated once, in the ask. Not written down anywhere else
The domain: plugins/finance/cash-flow-forecast, recorded 14 September 2026. No supporting file attached
Whether a regulated professional must review: plugins/finance/cash-flow-forecast. Partly documented: the what is written down, the who is not
Skills already loaded: 50 in the last period. No prior period attached, so no trend
```
### Example outcome
**Skill recommendation**
To: Yasir Jilani, author, Practice Skills
Date: 14 September 2026 · Needed by: 30 September 2026
**Decision**
A recommendation of cash-flow-forecast only, with strategy skills named as unnecessary for this task.
**What the file supports**
| Input | Value | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| The task | A user asks for a cash view and also wants a full corporate strategy loaded. Stated once, in the ask. Not written down anywhere else | Needs confirmation |
| The domain | plugins/finance/cash-flow-forecast, recorded 14 September 2026. No supporting file attached | Carried into the draft |
| Whether a regulated professional must review | plugins/finance/cash-flow-forecast. Partly documented: the what is written down, the who is not | Carried into the draft |
| Skills already loaded | 50 in the last period. No prior period attached, so no trend | Needs confirmation |
**How this draft was built**
**1. Restate the task in one sentence**
**2. Pick the one skill whose output matches the task. Add a second only if the task truly crosses domains**
**3. Prefer a specialist skill over a general strategy skill when the output is a defined artifact**
**4. Say which nearby skill is the wrong one and why**
**5. If the task asks for deception, evasion, or harm, do not route to a skill. Refuse and offer a legitimate alternative**
**Deliberately not done**
- Loading five skills for a simple memo.
- Routing a harmful request into a skill.
- Recommending a skill you cannot name.
**Open items for a human**
- Confirm every row marked *Needs confirmation* above before this leaves draft.
- Anything absent from the file stayed absent. No figure, date, or name was supplied from outside it.
Next: Yasir Jilani by 30 September 2026. This is a draft, not a sign-off.
## Anti-patterns
- Loading five skills for a simple memo
- Routing a harmful request into a skill
- Recommending a skill you cannot name
## Related skills
- `skill-authoring`
- `skill-library-trust-review`
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!