Write a README for a repeated personal or team process so someone else can run it. Use when the user mentions process README, how I do this, document my workflow, checklist README, or asks for a process README. Productivity skill by Yasir Jilani.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Readme For A Process?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/syasj-readme-for-a-process)
---
name: readme-for-a-process
description: "Write a README for a repeated personal or team process so someone else can run it. Use when the user mentions process README, how I do this, document my workflow, checklist README, or asks for a process README. Productivity skill by Yasir Jilani."
license: MIT
compatibility: Agent Skills standard. No network access, extra packages, or credentials required.
metadata:
author: Yasir Jilani
version: "1.0.0"
domain: productivity
---
<!-- GENERATED FILE - edits here are overwritten by scripts/generate.py.
Edit the 'readme-for-a-process' entry in source/, then run:
python3 scripts/generate.py && python3 scripts/validate.py
See CONTRIBUTING.md. -->
# Process README
Write a README for a repeated personal or team process so someone else can run it.
## When to use this skill
Use this skill when the user:
- process README
- how I do this
- document my workflow
- checklist README
## When not to use this skill
- The user wants a different domain's specialist skill.
- The task requires a licensed professional to decide, and the user only needs a referral note rather than a draft.
- The request asks you to deceive, evade a control, or hide material facts.
## Professional boundary
Productivity systems serve the person's actual constraints. Do not recommend surveillance of colleagues or hidden monitoring.
## Operating boundaries
- Use only information the user provides or files they explicitly ask you to read. Do not invent metrics, laws, citations, prices, credentials, or clinical facts.
- Do not ask for passwords, API keys, tokens, seed phrases, one-time codes, or payment card data.
- Do not send data to an external service, install packages, or add network calls as part of this skill.
- Separate facts, assumptions, and recommendations. If a required input is missing, state the assumption or ask one focused question.
- If the user asks you to deceive a person, evade a control, forge a record, or cause harm, stop. Offer a legitimate alternative.
- Work product that affects money, employment, health, safety, or legal rights is a draft for a qualified human to review before it is used.
## Inputs to collect
- The trigger
- The steps
- The tools
- The failure mode
## Workflow
### 1. Step 1
Open with when to use the process.
### 2. Step 2
Number the steps and the expected result.
### 3. Step 3
Name the failure mode and the fix.
### 4. Step 4
Keep secrets out of the README.
### 5. Step 5
Say who to ask.
### 6. Step 6
Cut steps that are superstition. If they cannot say why a step exists, mark it optional.
## Output
Deliver a **process README**.
- Purpose of this process README, in two sentences.
- Facts the user supplied, listed separately from assumptions.
- The work itself, in the structure the workflow names.
- Open questions, risks, and the single next action with an owner.
- What a qualified reviewer still needs to confirm, if the domain is regulated.
## Quality bar
- Every number, date, name, and citation came from the user or is marked as an assumption.
- The artifact can be used without reading this skill again.
- Recommendations are specific enough that someone could accept or reject them.
- Boundaries were respected: no credentials requested, no unsupported professional claim, no deception.
## Example
### Scenario
Mara Chen, founder at Northline Studio in Calgary, needs a process README by 30 September 2026. A README includes a personal access token so others can run a report.
### Example data
```text
From: Mara Chen, founder
Organization: Northline Studio, Calgary
Date: 14 September 2026
Needed by: 30 September 2026
A README includes a personal access token so others can run a report.
The trigger: Friday review block, recorded 14 September 2026. No supporting file attached
The steps: Friday review block; Inbox triage batch. Both unassigned as of 14 September 2026
The tools: the one named in the ask. Version and owner not recorded
The failure mode: Friday review block, first seen 14 September 2026. No root cause recorded yet
```
### Example outcome
**Process readme**
To: Mara Chen, founder, Northline Studio
Date: 14 September 2026 · Needed by: 30 September 2026
**Decision**
Removes the token, names the secret store, and keeps the real steps.
**What the file supports**
| Input | Value | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| The trigger | Friday review block, recorded 14 September 2026. No supporting file attached | Needs confirmation |
| The steps | Friday review block; Inbox triage batch. Both unassigned as of 14 September 2026 | Carried into the draft |
| The tools | the one named in the ask. Version and owner not recorded | Carried into the draft |
| The failure mode | Friday review block, first seen 14 September 2026. No root cause recorded yet | Needs confirmation |
**How this draft was built**
**1. Open with when to use the process**
**2. Number the steps and the expected result**
**3. Name the failure mode and the fix**
**4. Keep secrets out of the README**
**5. Say who to ask**
**Deliberately not done**
- Secrets in the README.
- Steps with no trigger.
- Superstition presented as required.
**Open items for a human**
- Confirm every row marked *Needs confirmation* above before this leaves draft.
- Anything absent from the file stayed absent. No figure, date, or name was supplied from outside it.
Next: Mara Chen by 30 September 2026. This is a draft, not a sign-off.
## Anti-patterns
- Secrets in the README
- Steps with no trigger
- Superstition presented as required
## Related skills
- `sop-writer`
- `documentation-as-code`