Write a product requirements document with a problem, scope, acceptance signals, and explicit non-goals. Use when the user mentions write a PRD, product requirements, feature spec, requirements document, or asks for a PRD. Product skill by Yasir Jilani.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Prd Writer?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/syasj-prd-writer)
---
name: prd-writer
description: "Write a product requirements document with a problem, scope, acceptance signals, and explicit non-goals. Use when the user mentions write a PRD, product requirements, feature spec, requirements document, or asks for a PRD. Product skill by Yasir Jilani."
license: MIT
compatibility: Agent Skills standard. No network access, extra packages, or credentials required.
metadata:
author: Yasir Jilani
version: "1.0.0"
domain: product
---
<!-- GENERATED FILE - edits here are overwritten by scripts/generate.py.
Edit the 'prd-writer' entry in source/, then run:
python3 scripts/generate.py && python3 scripts/validate.py
See CONTRIBUTING.md. -->
# PRD Writer
Write a product requirements document with a problem, scope, acceptance signals, and explicit non-goals.
## When to use this skill
Use this skill when the user:
- write a PRD
- product requirements
- feature spec
- requirements document
## When not to use this skill
- The user wants a different domain's specialist skill.
- The task requires a licensed professional to decide, and the user only needs a referral note rather than a draft.
- The request asks you to deceive, evade a control, or hide material facts.
## Professional boundary
Product recommendations are hypotheses until evidence says otherwise. Label confidence. Do not ship dark patterns that hide cost or consent.
## Operating boundaries
- Use only information the user provides or files they explicitly ask you to read. Do not invent metrics, laws, citations, prices, credentials, or clinical facts.
- Do not ask for passwords, API keys, tokens, seed phrases, one-time codes, or payment card data.
- Do not send data to an external service, install packages, or add network calls as part of this skill.
- Separate facts, assumptions, and recommendations. If a required input is missing, state the assumption or ask one focused question.
- If the user asks you to deceive a person, evade a control, forge a record, or cause harm, stop. Offer a legitimate alternative.
- Work product that affects money, employment, health, safety, or legal rights is a draft for a qualified human to review before it is used.
## Inputs to collect
- Problem and user
- Proposed scope
- Constraints
- Open questions
## Workflow
### 1. Problem and outcome
What will be true for the user if this ships. No outcome, no PRD.
### 2. Scope
The smallest slice that tests the outcome. Cut the rest into non-goals.
### 3. Flows
The main path and the important failure path. Do not specify every pixel unless the user asked for design detail.
### 4. Acceptance
Observable signals that the slice works. 'Feels better' is not acceptance.
### 5. Analytics and risks
What you will measure, and the risk you are accepting. Do not invent baseline numbers.
### 6. Open questions
Owner and date for each. A PRD that hides questions will slip in build.
## Output
Deliver a **PRD**.
- Purpose of this PRD, in two sentences.
- Facts the user supplied, listed separately from assumptions.
- The work itself, in the structure the workflow names.
- Open questions, risks, and the single next action with an owner.
- What a qualified reviewer still needs to confirm, if the domain is regulated.
## Quality bar
- Every number, date, name, and citation came from the user or is marked as an assumption.
- The artifact can be used without reading this skill again.
- Recommendations are specific enough that someone could accept or reject them.
- Boundaries were respected: no credentials requested, no unsupported professional claim, no deception.
## Example
### Scenario
Jonah Park, product manager at Fieldnote in Edmonton, needs a PRD by 30 September 2026. A PRD draft lists 15 features and no user outcome.
### Example data
```text
From: Jonah Park, product manager
Organization: Fieldnote, Edmonton
Date: 14 September 2026
Needed by: 30 September 2026
A PRD draft lists 15 features and no user outcome.
Problem and user: A PRD draft lists 15 features and no user outcome. Stated once, in the ask. Not written down anywhere else
Proposed scope: this decision only
Constraints: no extra headcount, and no result that is not in this file
Open questions: A PRD draft lists 15 features and no user outcome
```
### Example outcome
**Prd**
To: Jonah Park, product manager, Fieldnote
Date: 14 September 2026 · Needed by: 30 September 2026
**Decision**
A rewritten PRD with one outcome, a small slice, testable acceptance, and the other features as non-goals.
**What the file supports**
| Input | Value | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Problem and user | A PRD draft lists 15 features and no user outcome. Stated once, in the ask. Not written down anywhere else | Needs confirmation |
| Proposed scope | this decision only | Carried into the draft |
| Constraints | no extra headcount, and no result that is not in this file | Carried into the draft |
| Open questions | A PRD draft lists 15 features and no user outcome | Needs confirmation |
**How this draft was built**
**1. Problem and outcome**
What will be true for the user if this ships. No outcome, no PRD.
**2. Scope**
The smallest slice that tests the outcome. Cut the rest into non-goals.
**3. Flows**
The main path and the important failure path. Do not specify every pixel unless the user asked for design detail.
**4. Acceptance**
Observable signals that the slice works. 'Feels better' is not acceptance.
**5. Analytics and risks**
What you will measure, and the risk you are accepting. Do not invent baseline numbers.
**Deliberately not done**
- A PRD that is only a solution.
- Hidden non-goals.
- Acceptance criteria nobody can test.
**Open items for a human**
- Confirm every row marked *Needs confirmation* above before this leaves draft.
- Anything absent from the file stayed absent. No figure, date, or name was supplied from outside it.
Next: Jonah Park by 30 September 2026. This is a draft, not a sign-off.
## Anti-patterns
- A PRD that is only a solution.
- Hidden non-goals.
- Acceptance criteria nobody can test.
## Related skills
- `user-story-map`
- `product-analytics-spec`