Analyze a funnel with explicit step definitions and a focus on the biggest leak that the team can affect. Use when the user mentions funnel analysis, conversion funnel, drop-off, where do users drop, or asks for a funnel analysis. Data and analytics skill by Yasir Jilani.
Scanned 9/30/2026
npx -y skills add SYasJ/claude-business-skills --skill funnel-analysis --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Funnel Analysis?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/syasj-funnel-analysis)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.
---
name: funnel-analysis
description: "Analyze a funnel with explicit step definitions and a focus on the biggest leak that the team can affect. Use when the user mentions funnel analysis, conversion funnel, drop-off, where do users drop, or asks for a funnel analysis. Data and analytics skill by Yasir Jilani."
license: MIT
compatibility: Agent Skills standard. No network access, extra packages, or credentials required.
metadata:
author: Yasir Jilani
version: "1.0.0"
domain: data
---
<!-- GENERATED FILE - edits here are overwritten by scripts/generate.py.
Edit the 'funnel-analysis' entry in source/, then run:
python3 scripts/generate.py && python3 scripts/validate.py
See CONTRIBUTING.md. -->
# Funnel Analysis
Analyze a funnel with explicit step definitions and a focus on the biggest leak that the team can affect.
## When to use this skill
Use this skill when the user:
- funnel analysis
- conversion funnel
- drop-off
- where do users drop
## When not to use this skill
- The user wants a different domain's specialist skill.
- The task requires a licensed professional to decide, and the user only needs a referral note rather than a draft.
- The request asks you to deceive, evade a control, or hide material facts.
## Professional boundary
Do not invent numbers. If a source file is missing, say so. Distinguish observation from inference. Do not re-identify private data to make a point.
## Operating boundaries
- Use only information the user provides or files they explicitly ask you to read. Do not invent metrics, laws, citations, prices, credentials, or clinical facts.
- Do not ask for passwords, API keys, tokens, seed phrases, one-time codes, or payment card data.
- Do not send data to an external service, install packages, or add network calls as part of this skill.
- Separate facts, assumptions, and recommendations. If a required input is missing, state the assumption or ask one focused question.
- If the user asks you to deceive a person, evade a control, forge a record, or cause harm, stop. Offer a legitimate alternative.
- Work product that affects money, employment, health, safety, or legal rights is a draft for a qualified human to review before it is used.
## Inputs to collect
- The steps and their definitions
- Counts they provided
- How users are identified
- Known tracking gaps
## Workflow
### 1. Step 1
Write the step definitions. If two steps can fire out of order, say the funnel is messy.
### 2. Step 2
Compute conversion only from counts they gave. Show the arithmetic.
### 3. Step 3
Find the largest loss of people, not the largest percentage on a tiny step, and say which one you are using.
### 4. Step 4
Note tracking gaps before blaming the product.
### 5. Step 5
Separate a new-user funnel from a returning-user funnel if they differ in the data.
### 6. Step 6
Recommend one investigation or one product change to test, not five.
## Output
Deliver a **funnel analysis**.
- Purpose of this funnel analysis, in two sentences.
- Facts the user supplied, listed separately from assumptions.
- The work itself, in the structure the workflow names.
- Open questions, risks, and the single next action with an owner.
- What a qualified reviewer still needs to confirm, if the domain is regulated.
## Quality bar
- Every number, date, name, and citation came from the user or is marked as an assumption.
- The artifact can be used without reading this skill again.
- Recommendations are specific enough that someone could accept or reject them.
- Boundaries were respected: no credentials requested, no unsupported professional claim, no deception.
## Example
### Scenario
Noah Berger, data lead at Fieldnote in Edmonton, needs a funnel analysis by 30 September 2026. A funnel shows a huge drop between two events that can fire in either order.
### Example data
```text
From: Noah Berger, data lead
Organization: Fieldnote, Edmonton
Date: 14 September 2026
Needed by: 30 September 2026
A funnel shows a huge drop between two events that can fire in either order.
The steps and their definitions: orders_daily; customers. Both unassigned as of 14 September 2026
Counts they provided: 45 in the last period. No prior period attached, so no trend
How users are identified: customers, last reviewed 14 September 2026. No owner named since
Known tracking gaps: orders_daily is missing a source
```
### Example outcome
**Funnel analysis**
To: Noah Berger, data lead, Fieldnote
Date: 14 September 2026 · Needed by: 30 September 2026
**Decision**
Calls the funnel unordered, pauses the product blame, and asks for a sequenced definition.
**What the file supports**
| Input | Value | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| The steps and their definitions | orders_daily; customers. Both unassigned as of 14 September 2026 | Needs confirmation |
| Counts they provided | 45 in the last period. No prior period attached, so no trend | Carried into the draft |
| How users are identified | customers, last reviewed 14 September 2026. No owner named since | Carried into the draft |
| Known tracking gaps | orders_daily is missing a source | Needs confirmation |
**How this draft was built**
**1. Write the step definitions. If two steps can fire out of order, say the funnel is messy**
**2. Compute conversion only from counts they gave. Show the arithmetic**
**3. Find the largest loss of people, not the largest percentage on a tiny step, and say which one you are using**
**4. Note tracking gaps before blaming the product**
**5. Separate a new-user funnel from a returning-user funnel if they differ in the data**
**Deliberately not done**
- Blaming the product when tracking is broken.
- A funnel with undefined steps.
- Invented counts.
**Open items for a human**
- Confirm every row marked *Needs confirmation* above before this leaves draft.
- Anything absent from the file stayed absent. No figure, date, or name was supplied from outside it.
Next: Noah Berger by 30 September 2026. This is a draft, not a sign-off.
## Anti-patterns
- Blaming the product when tracking is broken
- A funnel with undefined steps
- Invented counts
## Related skills
- `cohort-analysis`
- `event-tracking-spec`
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!