Produce a sales forecast from evidence categories, not from a sum of hope. Use when the user mentions sales forecast, commit forecast, forecast call, what will we close, or asks for a forecast call note. Sales skill by Yasir Jilani.
Scanned 9/30/2026
npx -y skills add SYasJ/claude-business-skills --skill forecast-call --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Forecast Call?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/syasj-forecast-call)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.
---
name: forecast-call
description: "Produce a sales forecast from evidence categories, not from a sum of hope. Use when the user mentions sales forecast, commit forecast, forecast call, what will we close, or asks for a forecast call note. Sales skill by Yasir Jilani."
license: MIT
compatibility: Agent Skills standard. No network access, extra packages, or credentials required.
metadata:
author: Yasir Jilani
version: "1.0.0"
domain: sales
---
<!-- GENERATED FILE - edits here are overwritten by scripts/generate.py.
Edit the 'forecast-call' entry in source/, then run:
python3 scripts/generate.py && python3 scripts/validate.py
See CONTRIBUTING.md. -->
# Forecast Call
Produce a sales forecast from evidence categories, not from a sum of hope.
## When to use this skill
Use this skill when the user:
- sales forecast
- commit forecast
- forecast call
- what will we close
## When not to use this skill
- The user wants a different domain's specialist skill.
- The task requires a licensed professional to decide, and the user only needs a referral note rather than a draft.
- The request asks you to deceive, evade a control, or hide material facts.
## Professional boundary
Sell honestly. Do not invent customer proof, discounts, or competitor facts. Do not write deceptive, phishing, or high-pressure scripts.
## Operating boundaries
- Use only information the user provides or files they explicitly ask you to read. Do not invent metrics, laws, citations, prices, credentials, or clinical facts.
- Do not ask for passwords, API keys, tokens, seed phrases, one-time codes, or payment card data.
- Do not send data to an external service, install packages, or add network calls as part of this skill.
- Separate facts, assumptions, and recommendations. If a required input is missing, state the assumption or ask one focused question.
- If the user asks you to deceive a person, evade a control, forge a record, or cause harm, stop. Offer a legitimate alternative.
- Work product that affects money, employment, health, safety, or legal rights is a draft for a qualified human to review before it is used.
## Inputs to collect
- Opportunities proposed for commit
- Evidence for each
- Historical slippage the user admits
- The number leadership already hopes for
## Workflow
### 1. Define categories
Commit, best case, and pipeline, in the user's definitions. If they have none, propose simple evidence rules and label them as a proposal.
### 2. Test commit
A commit needs a buyer process and a date the buyer influenced. Seller optimism is not commit.
### 3. Slippage
If they historically slip, show a haircut as their own history, not as a punishment. Do not invent a history.
### 4. Range
Give a range and the deals that swing it. A single number hides the risk.
### 5. Hope gap
If leadership's target exceeds the evidence, say so plainly. Do not backfill fake deals.
### 6. Actions
The two inspections that would change the number this week.
## Output
Deliver a **forecast call note**.
- Purpose of this forecast call note, in two sentences.
- Facts the user supplied, listed separately from assumptions.
- The work itself, in the structure the workflow names.
- Open questions, risks, and the single next action with an owner.
- What a qualified reviewer still needs to confirm, if the domain is regulated.
## Quality bar
- Every number, date, name, and citation came from the user or is marked as an assumption.
- The artifact can be used without reading this skill again.
- Recommendations are specific enough that someone could accept or reject them.
- Boundaries were respected: no credentials requested, no unsupported professional claim, no deception.
## Example
### Scenario
Samir Qureshi, account executive at Fieldnote in Edmonton, needs a forecast call note by 30 September 2026. Leadership wants a number that is 30 percent above the deals with a real buyer process.
### Example data
```text
From: Samir Qureshi, account executive
Organization: Fieldnote, Edmonton
Date: 14 September 2026
Needed by: 30 September 2026
Leadership wants a number that is 30 percent above the deals with a real buyer process.
Opportunities proposed for commit: Harbor Goods, last reviewed 14 September 2026. No owner named since
Evidence for each: one PDF, 2 pages, dated 14 September 2026
Historical slippage the user admits: Harbor Goods. Partly documented: the what is written down, the who is not
The number leadership already hopes for: Harbor Goods, recorded 14 September 2026. No supporting file attached
```
### Example outcome
**Forecast call note**
To: Samir Qureshi, account executive, Fieldnote
Date: 14 September 2026 · Needed by: 30 September 2026
**Decision**
A forecast range, a clear gap to the hoped-for number, and two inspections, with no fake deals added to close the gap.
**What the file supports**
| Input | Value | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Opportunities proposed for commit | Harbor Goods, last reviewed 14 September 2026. No owner named since | Needs confirmation |
| Evidence for each | one PDF, 2 pages, dated 14 September 2026 | Carried into the draft |
| Historical slippage the user admits | Harbor Goods. Partly documented: the what is written down, the who is not | Carried into the draft |
| The number leadership already hopes for | Harbor Goods, recorded 14 September 2026. No supporting file attached | Needs confirmation |
**How this draft was built**
**1. Define categories**
Commit, best case, and pipeline, in the user's definitions. If they have none, propose simple evidence rules and label them as a proposal.
**2. Test commit**
A commit needs a buyer process and a date the buyer influenced. Seller optimism is not commit.
**3. Slippage**
If they historically slip, show a haircut as their own history, not as a punishment. Do not invent a history.
**4. Range**
Give a range and the deals that swing it. A single number hides the risk.
**5. Hope gap**
If leadership's target exceeds the evidence, say so plainly. Do not backfill fake deals.
**Deliberately not done**
- Sandbagging or inflating to please a room.
- A single-point forecast with no swing deals.
- Inventing historical win rates.
**Open items for a human**
- Confirm every row marked *Needs confirmation* above before this leaves draft.
- Anything absent from the file stayed absent. No figure, date, or name was supplied from outside it.
Next: Samir Qureshi by 30 September 2026. This is a draft, not a sign-off.
## Anti-patterns
- Sandbagging or inflating to please a room.
- A single-point forecast with no swing deals.
- Inventing historical win rates.
## Related skills
- `pipeline-review`
- `qualification-meddic`
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!