Write an escalation path with levels, clocks, and the decision each level can make. Use when the user mentions escalation playbook, escalate a ticket, severity path, customer escalation, or asks for a escalation playbook. Customer experience skill by Yasir Jilani.
Scanned 9/30/2026
npx -y skills add SYasJ/claude-business-skills --skill escalation-playbook --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Escalation Playbook?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/syasj-escalation-playbook)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.
---
name: escalation-playbook
description: "Write an escalation path with levels, clocks, and the decision each level can make. Use when the user mentions escalation playbook, escalate a ticket, severity path, customer escalation, or asks for a escalation playbook. Customer experience skill by Yasir Jilani."
license: MIT
compatibility: Agent Skills standard. No network access, extra packages, or credentials required.
metadata:
author: Yasir Jilani
version: "1.0.0"
domain: customer
---
<!-- GENERATED FILE - edits here are overwritten by scripts/generate.py.
Edit the 'escalation-playbook' entry in source/, then run:
python3 scripts/generate.py && python3 scripts/validate.py
See CONTRIBUTING.md. -->
# Escalation Playbook
Write an escalation path with levels, clocks, and the decision each level can make.
## When to use this skill
Use this skill when the user:
- escalation playbook
- escalate a ticket
- severity path
- customer escalation
## When not to use this skill
- The user wants a different domain's specialist skill.
- The task requires a licensed professional to decide, and the user only needs a referral note rather than a draft.
- The request asks you to deceive, evade a control, or hide material facts.
## Professional boundary
Do not blame the customer. Do not invent policy exceptions. Do not ask a customer for passwords or full payment card numbers.
## Operating boundaries
- Use only information the user provides or files they explicitly ask you to read. Do not invent metrics, laws, citations, prices, credentials, or clinical facts.
- Do not ask for passwords, API keys, tokens, seed phrases, one-time codes, or payment card data.
- Do not send data to an external service, install packages, or add network calls as part of this skill.
- Separate facts, assumptions, and recommendations. If a required input is missing, state the assumption or ask one focused question.
- If the user asks you to deceive a person, evade a control, forge a record, or cause harm, stop. Offer a legitimate alternative.
- Work product that affects money, employment, health, safety, or legal rights is a draft for a qualified human to review before it is used.
## Inputs to collect
- Severity definitions
- Who is on each level
- Clocks they can staff
- Customer communication owner
## Workflow
### 1. Step 1
Define severity by impact, not by who shouted.
### 2. Step 2
Each level has a clock and a decision it can make.
### 3. Step 3
Name the customer communication owner so engineering is not surprised by a promise.
### 4. Step 4
Include how to de-escalate when impact falls.
### 5. Step 5
Record what must be true before waking an executive.
### 6. Step 6
Do not design a path that hides a safety or security issue from the proper owner.
## Output
Deliver a **escalation playbook**.
- Purpose of this escalation playbook, in two sentences.
- Facts the user supplied, listed separately from assumptions.
- The work itself, in the structure the workflow names.
- Open questions, risks, and the single next action with an owner.
- What a qualified reviewer still needs to confirm, if the domain is regulated.
## Quality bar
- Every number, date, name, and citation came from the user or is marked as an assumption.
- The artifact can be used without reading this skill again.
- Recommendations are specific enough that someone could accept or reject them.
- Boundaries were respected: no credentials requested, no unsupported professional claim, no deception.
## Example
### Scenario
Rita Santos, support lead at Fieldnote in Edmonton, needs an escalation playbook by 30 September 2026. Every angry email is marked severe, so the on-call ignores the queue.
### Example data
```text
From: Rita Santos, support lead
Organization: Fieldnote, Edmonton
Date: 14 September 2026
Needed by: 30 September 2026
Every angry email is marked severe, so the on-call ignores the queue.
Severity definitions: Ticket 4418. Partly documented: the what is written down, the who is not
Who is on each level: Rita Santos, support lead
Clocks they can staff: two people on shift
Customer communication owner: Rita Santos, support lead
```
### Example outcome
**Escalation playbook**
To: Rita Santos, support lead, Fieldnote
Date: 14 September 2026 · Needed by: 30 September 2026
**Decision**
Defines severity by impact and reserves executive escalation for a written trigger.
**What the file supports**
| Input | Value | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Severity definitions | Ticket 4418. Partly documented: the what is written down, the who is not | Needs confirmation |
| Who is on each level | Rita Santos, support lead | Carried into the draft |
| Clocks they can staff | two people on shift | Carried into the draft |
| Customer communication owner | Rita Santos, support lead | Needs confirmation |
**How this draft was built**
**1. Define severity by impact, not by who shouted**
**2. Each level has a clock and a decision it can make**
**3. Name the customer communication owner so engineering is not surprised by a promise**
**4. Include how to de-escalate when impact falls**
**5. Record what must be true before waking an executive**
**Deliberately not done**
- Severity set by loudness.
- An executive ping with no path.
- Hidden security issues.
**Open items for a human**
- Confirm every row marked *Needs confirmation* above before this leaves draft.
- Anything absent from the file stayed absent. No figure, date, or name was supplied from outside it.
Next: Rita Santos by 30 September 2026. This is a draft, not a sign-off.
## Anti-patterns
- Severity set by loudness
- An executive ping with no path
- Hidden security issues
## Related skills
- `incident-response-coord`
- `sla-design`
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!