Build a provided-by-client list that answers the auditor's request without dumping the entire file room. Use when the user mentions PBC list, audit preparation, auditor request, provided by client, or asks for a PBC list and evidence index. Accounting skill by Yasir Jilani.
Scanned 9/30/2026
npx -y skills add SYasJ/claude-business-skills --skill audit-prep-pbc --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Audit Prep Pbc?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/syasj-audit-prep-pbc)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.
---
name: audit-prep-pbc
description: "Build a provided-by-client list that answers the auditor's request without dumping the entire file room. Use when the user mentions PBC list, audit preparation, auditor request, provided by client, or asks for a PBC list and evidence index. Accounting skill by Yasir Jilani."
license: MIT
compatibility: Agent Skills standard. No network access, extra packages, or credentials required.
metadata:
author: Yasir Jilani
version: "1.0.0"
domain: accounting
---
<!-- GENERATED FILE - edits here are overwritten by scripts/generate.py.
Edit the 'audit-prep-pbc' entry in source/, then run:
python3 scripts/generate.py && python3 scripts/validate.py
See CONTRIBUTING.md. -->
# Audit PBC Preparation
Build a provided-by-client list that answers the auditor's request without dumping the entire file room.
## When to use this skill
Use this skill when the user:
- PBC list
- audit preparation
- auditor request
- provided by client
## When not to use this skill
- The user wants a different domain's specialist skill.
- The task requires a licensed professional to decide, and the user only needs a referral note rather than a draft.
- The request asks you to deceive, evade a control, or hide material facts.
## Professional boundary
This is not an audit opinion, compilation, or tax advice. Do not invent accounting standards. Use the policy, framework, and chart of accounts the organization actually follows.
## Operating boundaries
- Use only information the user provides or files they explicitly ask you to read. Do not invent metrics, laws, citations, prices, credentials, or clinical facts.
- Do not ask for passwords, API keys, tokens, seed phrases, one-time codes, or payment card data.
- Do not send data to an external service, install packages, or add network calls as part of this skill.
- Separate facts, assumptions, and recommendations. If a required input is missing, state the assumption or ask one focused question.
- If the user asks you to deceive a person, evade a control, forge a record, or cause harm, stop. Offer a legitimate alternative.
- Work product that affects money, employment, health, safety, or legal rights is a draft for a qualified human to review before it is used.
## Inputs to collect
- The auditor's request list, if any
- Systems and owners
- Known difficult areas
- The period under audit
## Workflow
### 1. Restate each request
What evidence answers it, who owns it, and the period it covers. A request you do not understand gets a clarifying question, not a random export.
### 2. Prefer system reports
Name the report and the parameters. A spreadsheet recreation is a last resort and should be labeled.
### 3. Tie-out notes
For key numbers, say which report ties to the trial balance. Auditors will ask anyway.
### 4. Sensitive access
Provide exports, not shared logins. Do not hand over production credentials.
### 5. Track status
Open, provided, and follow-up. A list without status is a wish.
### 6. Flag judgment areas
Revenue, inventory, and estimates need the memo, not only the number. Do not write a fake memo that invents the auditor's conclusion.
## Output
Deliver a **PBC list and evidence index**.
- Purpose of this PBC list and evidence index, in two sentences.
- Facts the user supplied, listed separately from assumptions.
- The work itself, in the structure the workflow names.
- Open questions, risks, and the single next action with an owner.
- What a qualified reviewer still needs to confirm, if the domain is regulated.
## Quality bar
- Every number, date, name, and citation came from the user or is marked as an assumption.
- The artifact can be used without reading this skill again.
- Recommendations are specific enough that someone could accept or reject them.
- Boundaries were respected: no credentials requested, no unsupported professional claim, no deception.
## Example
### Scenario
Priya Shah, controller at Northline Studio in Calgary, needs a PBC list and evidence index by 30 September 2026. The external auditor asked for revenue samples and the team is about to export every invoice with no index.
### Example data
```text
From: Priya Shah, controller
Organization: Northline Studio, Calgary
Date: 14 September 2026
Needed by: 30 September 2026
The external auditor asked for revenue samples and the team is about to export every invoice with no index.
The auditor's request list, if any: Operating cash; Undeposited funds; Sales tax payable
Systems and owners: Priya Shah, controller
Known difficult areas: Undeposited funds. Stated in the ask, not documented anywhere else
The period under audit: month ending 14 September 2026
```
### Example outcome
**Pbc list and evidence index**
To: Priya Shah, controller, Northline Studio
Date: 14 September 2026 · Needed by: 30 September 2026
**Decision**
An indexed PBC with owners, report parameters, tie-out notes, and no shared passwords.
**What the file supports**
| Input | Value | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| The auditor's request list, if any | Operating cash; Undeposited funds; Sales tax payable | Needs confirmation |
| Systems and owners | Priya Shah, controller | Carried into the draft |
| Known difficult areas | Undeposited funds. Stated in the ask, not documented anywhere else | Carried into the draft |
| The period under audit | month ending 14 September 2026 | Needs confirmation |
**How this draft was built**
**1. Restate each request**
What evidence answers it, who owns it, and the period it covers. A request you do not understand gets a clarifying question, not a random export.
**2. Prefer system reports**
Name the report and the parameters. A spreadsheet recreation is a last resort and should be labeled.
**3. Tie-out notes**
For key numbers, say which report ties to the trial balance. Auditors will ask anyway.
**4. Sensitive access**
Provide exports, not shared logins. Do not hand over production credentials.
**5. Track status**
Open, provided, and follow-up. A list without status is a wish.
**Deliberately not done**
- Sending a login instead of an export.
- A data dump with no tie-out.
- Inventing an audit conclusion in the cover note.
**Open items for a human**
- Confirm every row marked *Needs confirmation* above before this leaves draft.
- Anything absent from the file stayed absent. No figure, date, or name was supplied from outside it.
Next: Priya Shah by 30 September 2026. This is a draft, not a sign-off.
## Anti-patterns
- Sending a login instead of an export.
- A data dump with no tie-out.
- Inventing an audit conclusion in the cover note.
## Related skills
- `internal-controls-walkthrough`
- `revenue-recognition-review`
- `financial-close-checklist`
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!