Analyze a complex problem with a fixed thinking skeleton; analysis only, no code changes.
Scanned 9/2/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add Surething-io/cockpit --skill ex --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Ex?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/surething-io-cockpit-691abf46)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: ex
description: "Analyze a complex problem with a fixed thinking skeleton; analysis only, no code changes."
---
# ex — structured discussion skill
Analyze complex problems with a fixed thinking skeleton. **Output analysis only; do not modify code.**
## Entry: complexity check
When the question arrives, **first judge complexity**:
- **Simple problem** → answer directly, **do not apply the methodology** (KISS)
- **Complex problem** → run the full 6-step skeleton below
Treat as complex if any of these holds:
- Multiple candidate solutions need trade-off
- Multiple hypotheses need verification
- Spans multiple modules / systems / layers
- The user explicitly asks for deep discussion
## Methodology skeleton (complex problems only)
Run in order, **in one pass, without stopping to ask the user**:
```
1. Problem study Clarify the problem itself through What / Why / How
2. Diverge Enumerate candidate hypotheses, solutions, perspectives
3. Converge Pick the top 1-3
4. Diverge again Deep-dive into the chosen ones (details, risks, edge cases)
5. Iterate-verify Verify key hypotheses via code search / web search / bash experiments
6. Summarize Conclude; use a comparison matrix when multiple options sit side by side
```
### What / Why / How facets (cross-cutting)
- **What**: what is the problem / solution, what is the boundary
- **Why**: why does this problem exist, why pick this solution
- **How**: how to implement / land / verify it
## Execution rules
### Run once, never interrupt the user
- **Never call AskUserQuestion**
- When information is missing → explicitly mark **"⚠️ Pending: xxx"** and let the user follow up later
- Do not stop just because info is incomplete; push as far as the evidence allows
### Verification means
Allowed verification tools:
| Means | Tools | Use case |
|---|---|---|
| Code search | Grep / Read / Glob | Find in-repo evidence for hypotheses |
| Web search | WebSearch / WebFetch | Look up official docs and external material |
| Bash experiments | Bash | Run small commands, test scripts, curl |
**Forbidden**: verifying by asking the user via AskUserQuestion.
## Output rules
- **No mandatory output template** — organize by what the problem needs
- **Comparison matrix is optional** — use it only when multiple options / hypotheses must sit side by side
- Simple questions get short answers; do not over-frame for the sake of framing
## What this skill does NOT do
- ❌ Do not modify code (this is a discussion skill, not an implementation skill)
- ❌ Do not interrupt the user mid-flow (one-shot)
- ❌ Do not force a comparison matrix on every question
- ❌ Do not compete with `/qa` or `/fx` — the three are siblings, triggered explicitly by the user

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!