Extract Key Terms From Land Option Agreement

---
name: extract-key-terms-land-option-agreement-solar
task_id: energy-natural-resources/extract-key-terms-from-land-option-agreement
description: Guides extraction of key terms from a solar project land option agreement by cross-referencing title and access encumbrances, comparing each term against relevant diligence standards, and flagging ambiguities in escalation mechanics and casualty provisions that create long-term risk.
activates_for: [planner, solver, checker]
---

# Skill: Extract Key Terms from Land Option Agreement — Term Sheet Summary for Solar Project

## 1. Subject-matter triage

- Treat the task as a due-diligence extraction and issue-spotting exercise, not a drafting rewrite.
- If multiple parcels, tracts, amendments, exhibits, title reports, surveys, or access materials are provided, enumerate them first and analyze each parcel or document set separately before synthesizing the term sheet.
- If only one parcel or one controlling agreement is in scope, state that explicitly and avoid implying broader coverage.
- Prioritize the operative agreement over summaries, drafts, emails, or redlines, but reconcile them when they change payment, exercise, access, or risk terms.

## 2. Failure modes the skill is correcting

- Baseline extracts the headline economics but misses whether escalation operates on a simple or compounded basis, creating a hidden divergence in long-term payment burden.
- Baseline reports an option limit or request frequency without checking whether related diligence materials require more frequent access to certificates, notices, or confirmations.
- Baseline summarizes access rights without tying them to title exceptions, easements, or restriction language that may limit construction or operations.
- Baseline states casualty or termination language without identifying the valuation standard that controls the threshold trigger.
- Baseline omits the legal mechanics that make a revocable use right convert into a durable real-property interest against third parties.
- Baseline lists assignment freedom without testing whether the transferee definition effectively preserves or eliminates consent control.
- Baseline gives a narrative summary but does not separate contract terms from diligence issues and recommended fixes.

## 3. Legal frameworks / domain conventions that apply

- Option-to-lease structure: identify the option grant, the exercise trigger, the resulting lease or easement package, and any conditions precedent to conversion; distinguish rights that are immediately binding from rights that arise only upon exercise.
- Title and survey diligence: cross-check the property description, access routes, exceptions, restrictions, recorded encumbrances, and any conservation or use limitations against the development footprint and any area-based economics.
- Escalation mechanics: a stated annual increase must be read for whether the increase applies to the original base amount or the prior period amount; flag ambiguity where the agreement does not say.
- Real property enforceability: if the agreement contemplates a license converting into an easement or other recorded interest, the term sheet should note whether recording, notice, and execution mechanics are sufficiently clear to bind successors.
- Casualty and insurance alignment: casualty termination or repair rights should be summarized together with the measure of loss, the trigger threshold, and the insurance regime that is expected to fund repairs or replacement.
- Assignment and transfer controls: define whether assignment is prohibited, consent-based, or freely permitted to specified transferees; note whether affiliate, financing, or project sale transfers are carved out.
- Estoppel and diligence instruments: summarize any right to request certificates, confirmations, or acknowledgments and compare the request cadence to the practical needs of financing, sale, or refinancing.
- Use the governing law, recording, and property-law concepts stated in the agreement or, if absent, the standard real-property rules applicable to the jurisdiction; do not state legal conclusions without tying them to the controlling rule.

## 4. Analytical scaffolds

- For each key provision, extract the operative term, then restate it in commercial terms, then identify the linked diligence question, then flag any ambiguity, market deviation, or enforcement risk.
- For each issue, include four elements: the provision at issue, the reason it matters, the interacting document or clause, and the downstream economic, operational, or transaction risk.
- For each parcel or tract, map title exceptions and access restrictions to development use, construction logistics, operation, and decommissioning assumptions.
- For each payment term, identify the payment type, trigger, timing, adjustment mechanism, and any missing math convention that could change the result over time.
- For each conversion mechanic, identify the acts required, the moment rights become vested or irrevocable, and any recording or notice step needed to protect priority.
- For each transfer or consent term, identify the default rule, any exceptions, and whether the defined permitted transferees are broad enough to defeat the apparent control right.
- If a document set contains competing drafts or amendment history, note the latest controlling text and mention any material divergence that affects the summary.

## 5. Vertical / structural / temporal relationships

- Sequence the summary from parties and property through economics, term, exercise, access, transfer, casualty, default, and closing mechanics so the reader can follow the rights as they mature.
- Distinguish present rights from contingent rights: option period, pre-exercise access, post-exercise lease or easement rights, and any survival obligations.
- Identify timing anchors for payment dates, notice windows, exercise deadlines, cure periods, reimbursement timing, and any conversion or recording deadlines.
- Where rights or obligations depend on another document, cross-reference the specific exhibit, title item, survey note, or diligence report that controls the relationship.
- If a term depends on acreage, boundary, or improvement value, state the operative reference point and note whether the agreement defines it clearly enough to avoid a later dispute.

## 6. Output structure conventions

- Produce a structured term sheet summary in conventional deal-summary form, using headings such as: transaction overview, property, option and exercise, consideration, access and use rights, title and survey matters, transfer and assignment, casualty and insurance, default and remedies, and closing or recording mechanics.
- Include a separate issues and risks section at the end.
- Use a uniform severity scale for issues and define it once at the start of the issues section.
- For each issue, state: severity, issue, why it matters, related provision or document, and recommended action.
- Make the issues section action-oriented: each recommendation should use an imperative verb, identify the responsible party or role if the source materials identify one, and tie the timing to a contractual deadline, financing milestone, closing step, or other practical urgency.
- Where the agreement or source materials identify controlling legal authority, cite it by name and section or other controlling citation in the relevant summary or issue entry.
- Keep the term sheet concise but complete; do not reproduce entire clauses, and do not quote source text except where exact wording is necessary to surface a material term.
- If multiple parcels, counterparties, or timing tracks are in play, present them in a numbered or table-like sequence rather than folding them into one blended description.