Draft Unanimous Written Consent For Officer Appointment

---
name: draft-unanimous-written-consent-for-officer-appointment
task_id: corporate-governance/draft-unanimous-written-consent-for-officer-appointment
description: Agents draft a board consent for officer appointments by checking for any required stockholder approvals, confirming the currentness of valuation support for equity grants, verifying plan capacity, and addressing any timing gap between consent execution and the officer’s start date.
activates_for: [planner, solver, checker]
---

# Skill: Unanimous Written Consent for Officer Appointment

## 1. Subject-matter triage
- Treat the bylaws, term sheets, and prior unanimous written consent as the controlling source set for appointment authority, approval mechanics, compensation conditions, and drafting style.
- Identify whether the task is purely a board consent or whether a companion memo is needed to surface unresolved issues before execution.
- Separate operative approvals from open items: the consent should be ready to sign, while the memo should isolate any conditions precedent, follow-ups, or assumptions that cannot be fully resolved from the source set alone.

## 2. Failure modes the skill is correcting
- Drafting the appointment resolution without first checking whether any officer-compensation approval is required under the governing documents or investor rights package.
- Authorizing equity grants without confirming that the supporting valuation materials are current enough for the contemplated grant date and that no intervening event calls the support into question.
- Failing to confirm plan availability before including grants, or omitting a note that a plan amendment or other approval may be needed if capacity is insufficient.
- Ignoring the gap between consent execution and the officer’s actual start date, which can leave the appointment or equity action ineffective or ambiguously conditional.
- Writing the consent as a narrative summary instead of a self-executing board action with clear effectiveness mechanics and clean delegation language.
- Omitting a separate issues memo when the source materials leave open items that should be flagged for counsel or management.

## 3. Legal frameworks / domain conventions that apply
- **Board authority and written consent mechanics:** Use the governing entity law and bylaws to confirm that board action by unanimous written consent is permitted and that the consent becomes effective only when signed by all required directors. Cite the governing corporate statute and the bylaw provision that authorizes action without a meeting, if identified in the source materials.
- **Officer appointment and removal:** Officer appointment typically follows board authorization under the bylaws or equivalent governance document. The consent should state title, reporting line if provided, effective time, and whether the appointment is at-will or otherwise terminable under the governing documents.
- **Compensation approval rights:** If the source documents contain stockholder or class consent rights over officer compensation, analyze the applicable threshold and approval group before finalizing the appointment package. Cite the governing certificate, stockholders’ agreement, or similar authority as provided in the materials.
- **Equity grant compliance:** Any option or equity award should be tied to the relevant equity plan, board authority, and grant-date pricing framework. The drafting should make clear that the grant is subject to the plan and to grant-date fair market value support, as reflected in the source materials.
- **Fair market value support:** If the source set includes a valuation report or other pricing support, treat it as usable only if it remains current on the contemplated grant date and no material change undermines it. If the materials do not resolve currency, the memo should flag the issue rather than assume support.
- **Plan capacity and authorization:** Confirm that the equity plan has sufficient authorized shares or units for all contemplated awards. If the materials suggest a shortfall, flag the need for additional board or stockholder action before issuance.
- **Effective-date conditioning:** Where the consent predates the officer’s start date, the appointment and any awards should be made conditional on that date or otherwise expressly deferred until service begins. The document should avoid a gap between approval and effectiveness.
- **Employment characterization:** Unless the source documents say otherwise, officer service is ordinarily described as at-will and subject to applicable governing documents and employment papers.
- **Conservative treatment of ambiguous compensation items:** If a sign-on bonus, guaranteed payment, or similar item is not clearly addressed in the approval-rights definition, flag the ambiguity and analyze conservatively rather than assuming exclusion.
- **Document hierarchy:** Prior consents, template language, and term sheets may inform style and sequencing, but they do not override the operative bylaws or approval rights reflected in the controlling sources.

## 4. Analytical scaffolds
- **Authority check:** Determine who may approve the appointments, what voting or written-consent threshold is required, and whether any separate stockholder or class approval is implicated.
- **Compensation-rights check:** For each proposed officer, identify salary, bonus, equity, and any other consideration the source materials treat as compensation, then test whether any consent threshold or investor approval right is triggered.
- **Equity-package check:** For each proposed award, identify the plan, award type, grant mechanics, vesting, and pricing basis; confirm that the grant is documented as being made under the relevant plan and at fair market value.
- **Support-currentness check:** Locate the most recent valuation or other pricing support in the source set, then assess whether the contemplated grant date is still within the support’s usable window and whether any intervening event requires refreshed support.
- **Capacity check:** Compare contemplated awards against available plan capacity using the source documents’ own figures and assumptions; if capacity is unclear or insufficient, flag the issue and avoid overstating the grant as final.
- **Timing check:** Compare the proposed consent date to each officer’s intended start date and make the effectiveness of appointment, compensation, and any grants explicit if the dates do not align.
- **Open-item register:** For every unresolved point, state the issue, why it matters, who must address it, and whether it is a closing condition, a pre-signing assumption, or a post-signing follow-up.

## 5. Vertical / structural / temporal relationships
- Draft the consent in execution order: authority recital, findings, appointment resolution, compensation terms, equity approval, delegation/filing authority, and effectiveness clause.
- Preserve the temporal relationship between board approval, officer start date, grant date, and any required stockholder approval so the document does not imply earlier effectiveness than the source materials support.
- If one officer’s package differs from the other’s, keep the approvals officer-specific rather than collapsing them into one composite authorization.
- If an issue memo is required, organize it by workstream and by timing: items needed before signing, items needed before effectiveness, and items that can follow after closing.
- Use cross-references within the consent so the operative provisions and any conditions precedent read as part of one integrated board action.

## 6. Output structure conventions
- **Primary deliverable first:** Draft the board unanimous written consent to completion before the cover memo, and ensure the consent is non-empty and fully operative before moving to the memo.
- **Board unanimous written consent:** Include recitals; authority to act by unanimous written consent; appointment of each officer by name and title; any compensation approval needed; any equity grant approval tied to plan and pricing support; effectiveness date or condition; authority to execute related paperwork; and any ratification or severability language that the source materials support.
- **Cover memorandum:** Address only open issues, assumptions, and required follow-up. For each item, state the issue, the controlling source authority or drafting basis, the practical consequence if unresolved, and the recommended next step.
- **Actionability:** Write the consent so it can be signed without editorial cleanup, and write the memo so a general counsel or corporate secretary can use it as a checklist.
- **Authority citation discipline:** Where the draft relies on a legal proposition drawn from the source materials or settled corporate practice, identify the governing statute, bylaw provision, agreement section, plan provision, or other controlling authority by name and section or equivalent locator.
- **Deliverable verification:** Before finishing, confirm that `officer-appointment-uwc.docx` contains the operative consent language and that `uwc-cover-memo.docx` contains the issue summary, not just headings or placeholders.
- **No rubric-shaped headings:** Use conventional corporate-law drafting forms rather than copying any hidden checklist structure.