A board written consent for a preferred stock financing should resolve the financing authorization, address any option plan adjustments and grant approvals, handle convertible instrument conversion mechanics, disclose and manage any interested-director issues, and authorize closing actions and document execution.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add sunyifeisb-art/legalwork --skill draft-board-consent-resolutions --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Draft Board Consent Resolutions?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/sunyifeisb-art-draft-board-consent-resolutions)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: ecvc-draft-board-consent-resolutions
task_id: emerging-companies-venture-capital/draft-board-consent-resolutions
description: A board written consent for a preferred stock financing should resolve the financing authorization, address any option plan adjustments and grant approvals, handle convertible instrument conversion mechanics, disclose and manage any interested-director issues, and authorize closing actions and document execution.
activates_for: [planner, solver, checker]
---
# Skill: Draft Board Consent Resolutions
## 1. Subject-matter triage
- This is a drafting task: produce the operative board consent first, then a short cover memo only after the consent is complete.
- Use the prior consent’s style as the baseline, but update the substance for the Series B financing and any related corporate actions reflected in the source set.
- If the source materials present more than one investor, security holder, option recipient, conversion instrument, or conflicted director, handle each specifically rather than collapsing them into a generic authorization.
- If the record is internally inconsistent, preserve the operative action in the consent and flag the discrepancy in the memo for human resolution.
## 2. Failure modes the skill is correcting
- Treating the consent as boilerplate instead of a document that must actually authorize the financing and its dependent corporate actions.
- Omitting investor-specific approvals, share counts, purchase terms, or other operative economics when the source materials supply them.
- Failing to address option plan capacity, new grants, or related equity administration before authorizing them.
- Hand-waving convertible instrument conversion mechanics instead of documenting the triggering mechanics and resulting issuance.
- Ignoring interested-director participation and the approval mechanics required for conflicted approvals.
- Failing to align the consent with the prior consent’s style, defined terms, and sequencing where the source set indicates continuity.
- Missing cross-document discrepancies between the cap table, term sheet, draft resolutions, and related transaction documents.
- Issuing the memo as a substitute for the consent rather than as a secondary issue-spotting companion.
## 3. Legal frameworks / domain conventions that apply
- Board written consent authority should track the applicable corporate statute governing action by written consent and board approval of stock issuances.
- Preferred stock financing resolutions should authorize the issuance of the relevant series, the purchase price, and the closing mechanics tied to the transaction record.
- Investor allocation should be stated by investor and allocation amount where the source materials provide that level of specificity.
- Option plan actions should respect the plan’s available reserve, any amendment mechanics, and the basis for pricing or grant approval under the applicable equity plan and valuation support.
- Convertible instrument conversion should be authorized only with the operative conversion mechanics stated consistently with the governing instrument and financing trigger.
- Interested-director matters should be handled under the applicable conflict-of-interest statute and the corporation’s approval process for disinterested approval or equivalent cleansing steps.
- Document execution and closing authority should empower the relevant officers to finalize, deliver, and file the transaction documents and ancillary instruments.
- Cross-document issue spotting should be framed as a consistency check across the consent, capitalization materials, financing documents, and any prior board action.
## 4. Analytical scaffolds
- Start with the financing authorization resolution: identify the security series, purchase price, closing authority, and the principal documents approved.
- Then address any investor-by-investor authorization in a schedule or embedded resolution, using the names and economics supplied in the source materials.
- If the financing contemplates an option pool increase or new grants, separate the pool amendment from the grant approvals and confirm plan capacity before any grant language.
- If the financing triggers conversion of outstanding instruments, state the conversion basis, the resulting securities to be issued, and the approval logic for that issuance.
- If any director has an interest in the financing, include a tailored disclosure and the approval mechanics for the disinterested decisionmakers.
- End the operative consent with customary authority to amend, execute, deliver, and take further actions to consummate the financing.
- Prepare the cover memo only after the consent draft is complete; use it to surface discrepancies, not to rewrite the operative resolutions.
- For each discrepancy, identify the affected document set, explain the inconsistency, and recommend the correction category without overcommitting to a factual fix when the source record is incomplete.
## 5. Vertical / structural / temporal relationships
- Sequence the consent so that authorization of the financing comes first, followed by dependent equity actions, then conflict-cleansing language, and finally execution and closing authority.
- If the transaction has conditions precedent or simultaneous closing steps, reflect them in the order that a board would reasonably authorize them.
- If the source materials reference a prior consent, preserve consistent defined terms, capitalization, and document names unless the new financing expressly changes them.
- When multiple documents speak to the same point, prefer the most recent operative transaction document, but flag the mismatch rather than silently harmonizing it.
- Keep the cover memo separate from the consent and make clear which items are operative and which are only flagged for reconciliation.
## 6. Output structure conventions
- Draft `series-b-board-consent.docx` as the primary deliverable and ensure it contains operative resolutions, not commentary.
- Draft `drafting-cover-memo.docx` only after the consent is complete and only to flag cross-document discrepancies and recommended resolution categories.
- Use a standard board written consent format with recitals or introductory clauses as appropriate, followed by numbered resolutions and any needed schedules.
- Include investor, grant, or conversion schedules only when the source materials supply enough detail to make them operative; do not invent missing economics.
- Preserve the style of the prior consent where possible, but update dates, parties, security series, and closing mechanics to match the current financing record.
- Where the source set supports it, state share counts, purchase prices, and other operative terms in the resolution text or attached schedule.
- In the cover memo, separate each discrepancy into its own concise entry and identify the documents that conflict.
- Before finishing, verify that the primary consent file exists, is non-empty, and contains the operative approvals for the financing and related corporate actions.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!