Skip to content
Back to skills

Audithandoffdoc

ASecurity

Deep audit producing a handoff document to get another agent fully up to speed

  • 201 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 2 views
  • Added May 26, 2026
documentation

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned May 27, 2026

npx -y skills add sterlingcrispin/claude_slash_commands --skill audithandoffdoc --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Audithandoffdoc?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Audithandoffdoc
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/sterlingcrispin-audithandoffdoc/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/sterlingcrispin-audithandoffdoc)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
description: Deep audit producing a handoff document to get another agent fully up to speed
---

Please perform a deep audit of our current task to produce a handoff document that gets another agent fully up to speed.

Deliverable:
Create a file named `AUDIT_HANDOFF.md` at the project root.

Document your current understanding of:
- what we are building
- why we are building it
- the project's telos (ultimate purpose/end-state)
- how we are approaching implementation
- what has been completed so far
- how we define and measure success
- current hypotheses
- what is true (with evidence) vs what is assumed
- what might be wrong
- highest-risk areas
- what we just tried and the outcome
- next hypothesis
- open questions

Required Structure (use these exact section headers)

1. `# Executive Summary`
- 5-10 bullets: current project state, trajectory, and key concerns.

2. `# Product Vision and Telos`
- What we are building.
- Why it matters.
- Desired end-state if the project fully succeeds.

3. `# Implementation Approach`
- Architecture and strategy.
- Key technical decisions and tradeoffs.
- Why this approach was chosen over alternatives.

4. `# Progress So Far`
- Completed work.
- In-progress work.
- Deferred/not started work.
- Include concrete references (files, PRs, commits, tests, docs) where possible.

5. `# Success Metrics`
- Define primary and secondary metrics.
- For each metric include: baseline, current value (if known), target, and measurement method.

6. `# Hypotheses`
- Current main hypothesis.
- Supporting sub-hypotheses.
- What would confirm or falsify each one.

7. `# Evidence vs Assumptions`
Include a table with columns:
`Claim | Type (Evidence/Assumption) | Source | Confidence (Low/Med/High) | Notes`

8. `# Failure Modes and Risk Register`
- What could be wrong.
- Highest-risk areas (ranked by impact x likelihood).
- Detection signals and mitigation options for each risk.

9. `# Most Recent Experiment/Attempt`
- What was just tried.
- Expected result.
- Actual result.
- Interpretation.
- Artifacts (logs, test outputs, benchmark data, screenshots, etc.).

10. `# Next Hypothesis and Immediate Plan`
- Next best hypothesis to test.
- Why this is the highest-leverage next step.
- Step-by-step plan for the next iteration.

11. `# Open Questions`
- Unresolved technical, product, and operational questions.
- For each: why it matters, blocking status, and who/what can resolve it.

## Quality Bar

- Clearly separate **facts**, **inferences**, and **assumptions**.
- Prefer concrete evidence over narrative.
- Cite sources directly (file paths, line refs, commands, outputs, tickets, PR links).
- Be explicit about uncertainty and confidence.
- Keep it concise but complete; optimize for fast onboarding and auditability.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.