Skip to content
Back to skills

Reclassify Tests

ASecurity

Reclassify tests by adding @pytest.mark.functionality to tests not explicitly shown in the spec. Invoke with /reclassify-tests <problem> <checkpoint>.

  • 207 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 2 views
  • Added June 6, 2026
documentationpythonbash

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned June 6, 2026

npx -y skills add SprocketLab/slop-code-bench --skill reclassify-tests --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Reclassify Tests?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Reclassify Tests
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/sprocketlab-reclassify-tests/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/sprocketlab-reclassify-tests)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: reclassify-tests
description: Reclassify tests by adding @pytest.mark.functionality to tests not explicitly shown in the spec. Invoke with /reclassify-tests <problem> <checkpoint>.
---

# Reclassify Tests

Analyze a checkpoint's spec and test file to identify tests that are NOT explicitly demonstrated in the spec examples, and add `@pytest.mark.functionality` markers to them.

**Usage**: `/reclassify-tests file_backup checkpoint_1`

## Purpose

Core tests (unmarked) should only cover behaviors that are **explicitly demonstrated in spec examples**. Tests that verify implicit requirements, edge cases, or inferred behaviors should be marked as `@pytest.mark.functionality`.

This skill helps ensure fair evaluation by:
- Keeping core tests limited to explicit spec examples
- Moving implicit/inferred behaviors to functionality tests
- Making test classification consistent and justifiable

---

## Step 1: Gather Context

Read these files for the specified problem/checkpoint:

```
problems/{problem}/checkpoint_N.md              # Spec with examples
problems/{problem}/tests/test_checkpoint_N.py   # Test file to reclassify
problems/{problem}/tests/conftest.py            # Fixtures context
problems/{problem}/tests/data/checkpoint_N/     # Test case data (if present)
```

---

## Step 2: Extract Explicit Spec Behaviors

From the spec, identify behaviors that are **explicitly demonstrated**:

### What Counts as "Explicit"

1. **Direct Examples**: Code blocks showing exact input → output
2. **Explicit Statements**: "MUST", "SHALL", specific values defined
3. **Example Output**: JSON/text showing exact expected format
4. **Stated Requirements**: Numbered/bulleted requirements with specific behavior

### What Does NOT Count as "Explicit"

1. **Implied Behavior**: Reasonable inferences not shown in examples
2. **Edge Cases**: Boundary conditions not demonstrated
3. **Error Handling**: Unless specific errors are shown in examples
4. **Format Details**: Exact formatting beyond what examples show
5. **Ordering**: Unless explicitly stated or shown in all examples

### Create a Checklist

For each spec example, note:
- What input is shown?
- What output is shown?
- What behavior is demonstrated?

---

## Step 3: Analyze Each Test

For each test function or parametrized test case:

### A. Identify What the Test Verifies

- What specific behavior does this test check?
- What input does it use?
- What output does it expect?

### B. Find Spec Support

Ask: **"Can I point to a spec example that explicitly demonstrates this exact behavior?"**

| Spec Support | Classification |
|--------------|----------------|
| Example shows exact scenario | **Keep as core** (no marker) |
| Behavior stated but no example | **Mark as functionality** |
| Inferred from context | **Mark as functionality** |
| Edge case not shown | **Mark as functionality** |
| Error handling not in examples | **Mark as error** |

### C. Document the Decision

For each test, note:
- Spec support (quote or "NONE")
- Classification decision
- Reason

---

## Step 4: Apply Markers

### For Tests to Reclassify

Add `@pytest.mark.functionality` ABOVE the test function or parametrize decorator:

**Before:**
```python
@pytest.mark.parametrize("case", EDGE_CASES, ids=[c["id"] for c in EDGE_CASES])
def test_edge_cases(entrypoint_argv, case, tmp_path):
    ...
```

**After:**
```python
@pytest.mark.functionality
@pytest.mark.parametrize("case", EDGE_CASES, ids=[c["id"] for c in EDGE_CASES])
def test_edge_cases(entrypoint_argv, case, tmp_path):
    ...
```

### For Individual Parametrized Cases

If some cases in a parametrized test are explicit and others aren't, consider:

1. **Split the test**: Separate core cases from functionality cases
2. **Use pytest.param with marks**:

```python
@pytest.mark.parametrize("case", [
    pytest.param(case1, id="explicit-case"),
    pytest.param(case2, marks=pytest.mark.functionality, id="inferred-case"),
])
def test_cases(case):
    ...
```

---

## Step 5: Report Changes

Generate a summary of changes made:

```markdown
# Reclassification Report: {problem} {checkpoint}

## Summary
- Tests analyzed: N
- Tests reclassified: N
- Tests unchanged: N

## Reclassified Tests

### `test_function_name` → @pytest.mark.functionality

**Reason**: Test verifies [behavior] which is not explicitly demonstrated in spec.

**Spec says**: [Quote or "No example shown"]

**Test expects**: [What the test checks]

---

### `test_another_function` → @pytest.mark.functionality
...

## Unchanged Tests (Explicitly in Spec)

| Test | Spec Example Reference |
|------|------------------------|
| `test_core_case_1` | Example 1: shows exact input/output |
| `test_core_case_2` | Example 2: demonstrates this scenario |
```

---

## Classification Guidelines

### KEEP AS CORE (no marker) when:

- Spec example shows exact input and expected output
- Behavior is explicitly stated with specific values
- Test directly validates a demonstrated scenario
- Example output format matches test expectations exactly

### MARK AS FUNCTIONALITY when:

- Behavior is reasonable but not shown in examples
- Test checks edge cases not demonstrated
- Test verifies format details beyond examples
- Test validates inferred requirements
- Test checks ordering not explicitly stated
- Test validates error messages/codes not shown

### MARK AS ERROR when:

- Test validates error handling for invalid input
- Test checks failure modes
- Test expects non-zero exit or exceptions

---

## Common Reclassification Scenarios

### 1. Implicit Ordering
```
Spec: "Process all jobs"
Test: Expects specific alphabetical order
→ Mark as functionality (unless spec explicitly shows ordering)
```

### 2. Edge Values
```
Spec: "Duration in hours"
Test: Checks duration=0, duration=MAX
→ Mark as functionality (unless 0/MAX shown in examples)
```

### 3. Format Details
```
Spec: Shows JSON output example
Test: Checks exact whitespace, key ordering
→ Mark as functionality (unless spec says "must match exactly")
```

### 4. Error Handling
```
Spec: "Return non-zero on error"
Test: Checks specific error code or message
→ Mark as error (and consider relaxing the assertion)
```

### 5. Field Presence
```
Spec: Example shows fields A, B, C
Test: Requires field D not in any example
→ Mark as functionality
```

---

## Data-Driven Test Considerations

Many test files use data directories like:

```
tests/data/checkpoint_N/
├── core/      # Core test cases
├── hidden/    # Functionality test cases
├── errors/    # Error test cases
```

When test data is already organized this way:

1. **Check that markers match data directories**:
   - Tests loading from `core/` should have no marker
   - Tests loading from `hidden/` should have `@pytest.mark.functionality`
   - Tests loading from `errors/` should have `@pytest.mark.error`

2. **Consider moving cases between directories** if:
   - A "core" case tests implicit behavior → move to `hidden/`
   - A "hidden" case tests explicit behavior → move to `core/`

---

## Example Analysis

Given spec excerpt:
```markdown
## Example 1
Input: `--now 2025-09-10T03:30:00Z --duration 1`
Output:
{"event":"SCHEDULE_PARSED","timezone":"UTC","jobs_total":2}
{"event":"JOB_ELIGIBLE","job_id":"job-root","kind":"daily",...}
```

And tests:
```python
def test_schedule_parsed_event():
    """Verify SCHEDULE_PARSED is emitted first."""
    # ✓ KEEP AS CORE - Example 1 shows this event first

def test_schedule_parsed_fields():
    """Verify SCHEDULE_PARSED has timezone and jobs_total."""
    # ✓ KEEP AS CORE - Example 1 shows these exact fields

def test_empty_schedule():
    """Verify empty schedule returns jobs_total=0."""
    # → MARK AS FUNCTIONALITY - No example shows empty schedule

def test_invalid_timezone():
    """Verify invalid timezone returns error."""
    # → MARK AS ERROR - Error handling case
```

---

## After Reclassification

1. **Run tests** to ensure markers are syntactically correct:
   ```bash
   cd problems/{problem} && pytest --collect-only tests/test_checkpoint_N.py
   ```

2. **Verify counts** match expectations:
   ```bash
   pytest --collect-only -m "not functionality and not error" tests/  # Core only
   pytest --collect-only -m functionality tests/  # Functionality only
   pytest --collect-only -m error tests/  # Error only
   ```

3. **Review the changes** - did any truly explicit tests get marked?

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.