Use when a Token Meter Slack or GitHub request needs contextual intake, clarification, triage, acknowledgment, or closure.
Scanned 9/2/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add splunk/token-meter --skill token-meter-intake --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Token Meter Intake?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/splunk-token-meter-intake)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: token-meter-intake
description: Use when a Token Meter Slack or GitHub request needs contextual intake, clarification, triage, acknowledgment, or closure.
---
# Token Meter Intake
## Purpose
Turn feedback into a truthful human response and an actionable work envelope. Intake
does not grant implementation or external-write authority.
## Context first
- Open a Slack permalink through the Slack integration so attachments and the complete
thread are included; do not reconstruct channel and timestamp values by hand.
- Read the linked GitHub issue or pull request in full, including comments and cited
evidence. If a link is unavailable or ambiguous, ask for the correct source rather
than implementing the paraphrase.
- Separate observed behavior, reporter interpretation, and open product decisions.
- Inspect current repository and dirty-tree ownership before promising a change.
## Human response
Draft a short acknowledgment in the thread's tone. Say what is understood, what is
being checked, and what input is still needed. Do not invent a diagnosis, deadline,
or completion claim.
Every Slack message or GitHub comment is a separate external action. Preview the exact
text and obtain explicit approval for that message immediately before posting. An
approval for investigation, code, or a previous message does not cover a later reply.
## Classification
Produce:
- Requested behavior, acceptance criteria, scope, and non-goals.
- Task class from `.agents/workflow/routing.yaml`.
- Risk categories from `.agents/workflow/review-policy.yaml`.
- Evidence already available and evidence still needed.
- Recommended route and actions that still require approval.
Questions and clarifications normally remain with the coordinator. Diagnosis-only,
implementation, verification, review, and GitHub operations move through their
declared roles only when needed.
## Close the loop
Before drafting a completion response, verify the current workflow state and evidence.
State what changed, what was verified, and what remains unverified. Keep the update
truthful when work is blocked, local-only, uncommitted, unpushed, or not deployed.
Never include credentials, raw traces, prompts, responses, reasoning, tool contents,
account data, or private local paths in a public or shared response.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!