Skip to content
Back to skills

Researcher Context Audit

ASecurity

Use when the Researcher starts, resumes, or reaches a major decision point. Build a context inventory from workstation materials, prior messages, existing artifacts, requirements, and unfinished work.

  • 390 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 2 views
  • Added June 6, 2026
ai-agentsrustgonode

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned June 6, 2026

npx -y skills add SpectrAI-Initiative/InnoClaw --skill researcher-context-audit --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Researcher Context Audit?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Researcher Context Audit
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/spectrai-initiative-researcher-context-audit/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/spectrai-initiative-researcher-context-audit)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: "Researcher Context Audit"
slug: "researcher-context-audit"
description: "Use when the Researcher starts, resumes, or reaches a major decision point. Build a context inventory from workstation materials, prior messages, existing artifacts, requirements, and unfinished work."
allowed-tools:
  - listDirectory
  - readFile
  - grep
---

# Researcher Context Audit

Use this skill before planning, before major re-planning, and after interruptions. The goal is to establish a trustworthy operating picture for the automated research workflow.

## What To Review

- User goal, preferred framing, and explicit constraints.
- Existing nodes, artifacts, and checkpoints.
- Completed, pending, blocked, superseded, and rejected work.
- Research memory, workstation materials, recent notes, and prior decisions.
- Evidence quality, open questions, and unresolved contradictions.

## Output Contract

Produce a compact but decision-ready context review that includes:

1. Confirmed objective.
2. What has already been completed.
3. What remains unfinished.
4. Which assumptions are still unconfirmed.
5. Which prior directions were rejected or superseded.
6. Which constraints or resources materially affect the next step.

## Quality Rules

- Distinguish facts from summaries and summaries from inferences.
- Do not repeat the full transcript; compress to the minimum useful operating state.
- Do not ignore prior user corrections or prior failed attempts.
- If the context is insufficient for safe planning, explicitly trigger the ambiguity gate instead of improvising.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.