This skill should be used when the user wants to review the portfolio — "portfolio review", "review my holdings", "how are we positioned", "check my positions", monthly or quarterly reviews, or after large market moves. Covers thesis health, sizing drift, correlations, cash, and watchlist readiness.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Portfolio Review?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/soo0803-portfolio-review)
---
name: portfolio-review
description: >
This skill should be used when the user wants to review the portfolio — "portfolio
review", "review my holdings", "how are we positioned", "check my positions", monthly
or quarterly reviews, or after large market moves. Covers thesis health, sizing drift,
correlations, cash, and watchlist readiness.
metadata:
version: "0.1.0"
---
# Portfolio Review
Load the firm-doctrine skill (ground-rules + sizing-and-selling).
## Inputs
Read `wj-records/portfolio.md` and `wj-records/watchlist.md` if they exist. If they do
not, ask the user for current holdings (ticker, shares or weight, cost basis, buy date)
and have the **scribe** create the files first — the review is only as good as the record.
## Procedure
1. Dispatch **risk-officer** with the portfolio file and the objective: full review —
current weights and prices (tool-fetched), price vs each memo's intrinsic-value range,
concentration and hidden-correlation analysis, liquidity, FX mix, cash level,
doctrine-drift check, and the drawdown-preparedness check (is the watchlist stocked
with buy-below prices?).
2. In parallel, for each holding whose memo lists pre-committed falsifiers, have the
risk-officer check headline-level whether any appear to have fired; anything
suspicious gets a targeted **red-team** follow-up (separate dispatch per name, only
where warranted — effort scaling, not blanket re-research).
3. On return, synthesize inline: the state of the portfolio in ≤1 page, verdict-first.
## Output (to the user)
- Portfolio table: weight / cost / price [source] / vs intrinsic range / thesis health /
next re-underwrite date
- Concerns ranked by potential PERMANENT loss (not volatility)
- Any sell-discipline or ground-rule trigger in bold (with the rule quoted) — decision
left to the founder, no urgency
- Cash and watchlist readiness: which watchlist names are near buy-below prices
- Suggested follow-ups (re-underwrites due, UNVERIFIED items to close)
- Have the **scribe** update `portfolio.md` with the review date and findings.
Never suggest trading because prices moved. Quotes don't kill theses; facts do.