Use to work the way the Claude Code team works — parallelize aggressively across worktrees and subagents, plan before non-trivial work, verify everything, and reach for /loop, /batch, /simplify, and effort:max on the right tasks. The power-user operating posture, distilled.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add SkyyRoseLLC/DevSkyy --skill boris-mind --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Boris Mind?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/skyyrosellc-boris-mind)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: boris-mind
description: Use to work the way the Claude Code team works — parallelize aggressively across worktrees and subagents, plan before non-trivial work, verify everything, and reach for /loop, /batch, /simplify, and effort:max on the right tasks. The power-user operating posture, distilled.
origin: SkyyRose
---
# Boris Mind
The single biggest productivity unlock is **parallelism** — the Claude Code team runs
3-5 sessions at once, one per git worktree, and delegates independent work to subagents.
This skill makes that posture the team default: spread work wide, plan before you build,
and prove every result. It distills the `boris` skill (Boris Cherny's workflow tips) into
an operating stance the SkyyRose pods practice, not a tip sheet you read once.
> **Boot first:** `CLAUDE.md` (autonomy boundary + STOP-AND-SHOW), `.wolf/cerebrum.md`
> (User Preferences), and `CROSS-PLUGIN.md` (which pod owns what). Parallelism without
> the guardrails is just faster mistakes.
## When to Use
- Any task with independent sub-parts (fan them out — never serialize independent work).
- Before starting anything non-trivial (3+ steps or an architectural call) → plan first.
- A recurring or scheduled job → `/loop`; a repeated migration across many files → `/batch`.
- Hard reasoning (design, gnarly bug) → raise reasoning effort (`effort:max`).
- After writing code → dispatch a review agent; before shipping → verify.
## The posture
1. **Parallelize by default.** Decompose into independent units and dispatch them in ONE
message as parallel subagents (or separate worktrees). Reserve `isolation: worktree`
for agents that mutate files concurrently. Never run in series what has no shared state.
2. **Plan before building.** For non-trivial work, plan first (state it, get the shape
right), then execute the whole plan without pausing between steps. Pair with
[[adversarial-planning]] when a wrong plan is expensive to discover late.
3. **Delegate, don't hoard context.** Offload research, exploration, and per-file work to
subagents; keep the main thread clean. One task per subagent, focused.
4. **Right tool for the task.** `/simplify` for quality passes, `/batch` for parallel
migrations, `/loop` for recurring jobs, code-review agents after writing, higher effort
for the hardest reasoning. Match the instrument to the work.
5. **Memory is context.** Keep `CLAUDE.md` / `.wolf/*` current so every session and
subagent starts oriented — see [[memory-system]] and [[self-learning]].
## Loop until the work is spread and proven
Bounded, like [[drive-to-green]] — ≤5 turns, stop if the shape stops improving:
```
1. Decompose the task into independent units.
2. Fan them out (parallel subagents / worktrees) — plan-first for non-trivial ones.
3. Collect results; a review agent checks the code, a verifier re-derives evidence.
4. If a unit is wrong → re-dispatch just that unit → re-verify. Stop when all pass.
```
## Verify from an authoritative source
Parallel speed is worthless if the results are unchecked:
- **Never trust a subagent's word.** The main thread independently re-derives every
"done" — re-run the exact test, re-grep the footprint, re-check `git diff` scope — the
[[adversarial-verification]] and [[self-healing]] pattern. A green report is a claim,
not proof.
- **Confirm the fan-out actually converged** — read each unit's real output/diff, not its
summary; a subagent that returned `null` (skipped or died) is a hole, not a success.
- **Scope check** — `git diff --name-only` shows only the paths this task should touch.
## Adversarial pass
- **Before** a big fan-out: [[adversarial-planning]] — a genuinely different model
(Codex via `codex exec`) challenges the decomposition before you spend the compute.
- **After**: [[adversarial-verification]] — default to "not done" until independently proven.
## Guardrails · Handoff · Log
- Parallelism does not relax the [[cost-governance-gate]]: money / production / irreversible
actions still STOP-AND-SHOW, even mid-fan-out.
- Autonomy means finishing without hand-holding **after** the plan and inputs are set — it
never means deciding what to deploy or spend without checking (`CLAUDE.md`).
- Route each unit to its owning pod per `CROSS-PLUGIN.md`; log reusable workflow lessons via
[[continuous-learning]]. Pairs with [[efficient-production]] and [[token-aware-behavior]]
for tool- and context-discipline while running wide.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!