Writes the description field that makes a skill fire reliably - WHAT it does, WHEN to invoke it with quoted user phrasing, and what it is NOT for. Use when drafting or improving only the description or trigger of a SKILL.md or catalog entry - "this skill never fires", "fix this description", "write the frontmatter description". Do NOT use to author a whole skill (use skill-creator) or to grade/audit one (use skill-auditor).
Scanned 9/6/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add SkillMedev/skills --skill skill-description-writer --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Skill Description Writer?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/skillmedev-skill-description-writer)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: Skill Description Writer
description: Writes the description field that makes a skill fire reliably - WHAT it does, WHEN to invoke it with quoted user phrasing, and what it is NOT for. Use when drafting or improving only the description or trigger of a SKILL.md or catalog entry - "this skill never fires", "fix this description", "write the frontmatter description". Do NOT use to author a whole skill (use skill-creator) or to grade/audit one (use skill-auditor).
---
# Skill Description Writer
Crafts the description field that determines whether a skill is ever selected. A weak description means the skill never fires; an overloaded one fires on the wrong tasks. This is the highest-leverage line in any skill: the body only matters if the description gets it loaded.
## Inputs to collect
1. What the skill produces (its deliverable, one sentence).
2. Three or more phrases a real user would type when they need it - in the user's words, not the author's.
3. The nearest neighbor skills a request could confuse it with.
If the author cannot supply real user phrasing, derive candidates from the body's deliverable and triggers, and mark them for validation with skill-tester.
## The three-part formula
Every description contains these parts, in this order:
1. **WHAT** - one tight sentence naming the capability in active third person: "Generates a zero-downtime database migration plan."
2. **WHEN** - concrete trigger conditions, quoting real user phrasing where possible: "Use when adding columns, altering types, dropping tables, or backfilling data on a live schema" or "Triggers on 'is this term sheet fair', 'liquidation preference', 'board seats'."
3. **NOT** - negative scope routing to the named neighbor, whenever a plausible confusion exists: "Do NOT use for offline schema redesign - use database-schema instead."
For skills with strong, distinctive triggers, WHEN may lead ("Use when…") and WHAT follows - the order that disambiguates fastest wins. The NOT clause is mandatory when a neighbor exists and omitted only when nothing could plausibly collide.
## Trigger term density
Pack the WHEN clause with the exact nouns, verbs, and phrases users type. Think: what would someone say the moment they need this? Include synonyms for the same action ("negotiate", "counter", "push back on"). Concrete verbs beat abstract nouns: "adding, altering, debugging" fires; "enhancement, improvement" never does.
## Length and formatting
- Frontmatter description: 1024 chars max. Simple skills land at 150-300 chars; skills with many trigger phrases and a NOT clause legitimately run 400-700.
- Catalog card/summary field: 200 chars max - WHAT plus the strongest trigger only.
- Third person, active voice throughout ("Generates", "Reviews" - never "I will" or "Helps you").
- No backticks or markdown inside the value; no trailing period issues in YAML; no dates or versions.
## Good / bad
Good: "Reviews a diff for correctness, security, and regression risk. Use before opening a PR, after writing a non-trivial change, or when asked to 'review this code'. Do NOT use for style-only formatting passes."
Bad: "A helpful skill for reviewing things when you want feedback." - no trigger, no scope, vague qualifier.
Good: leads with the output - "Produces a cited research report…"
Bad: leads with the method - "Uses web searches to gather information…"
## Deliverable
The rewritten description string (frontmatter version, plus the 200-char catalog version when asked), with a one-line note naming which trigger phrases were added and which neighbor the NOT clause routes to.
## Do NOT
- Do not stuff triggers the skill cannot serve - over-broad descriptions cause misfires, which cost more trust than silence.
- Do not describe the skill's internal method; describe the user's moment of need and the output.
- Do not use vague qualifiers ("helpful", "useful", "powerful", "better").
- Do not omit the NOT clause when a named neighbor exists; collisions are territory defects, and the description is where they are fixed.
## Quality bar
Done when: WHAT, WHEN, and (where a neighbor exists) NOT are all present; at least three concrete trigger phrases appear in the user's own words; a router reading only this description would fire it on the right request and stay silent on the nearest wrong one.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!