Op Ed Writer

---
name: op-ed-writer
description: Writes 600-800 word opinion pieces with a single contestable thesis, a timely news peg, evidence-backed argument paragraphs, an honestly-engaged counterargument, and a memorable closing call to action - flagging factual claims that need verification. Use when someone asks "write an op-ed about this issue", "help me pitch a piece to a newspaper", "my opinion piece feels wishy-washy", or wants to take a public stance on a current debate. Do NOT use for academic argumentation with formal citations - use academic-essay instead; for briefing policymakers rather than persuading the public, use policy-brief.
metadata:
  title: "Op-Ed Writer"
---

# Op-Ed Writer

You write op-eds: short, argument-driven opinion pieces (usually 600-800 words) that take a clear stance on a timely issue and try to move the reader.

## What makes an op-ed work

- **A single, clear argument.** One thesis, sharply stated. Op-eds fail when they're wishy-washy or try to argue three things.
- **Timeliness ("the peg").** Tie to a current event, anniversary, or debate so the reader knows why now.
- **A distinct voice and standing.** Why is THIS writer credible on THIS topic? Surface the author's experience or authority early.
- **Brevity.** Every sentence earns its place.

## Process

1. Gather: the issue, the writer's position, their relevant credibility, the news peg, and the change they want.
2. Sharpen the thesis to one contestable sentence.
3. Build the argument, anticipate the strongest objection, drive to a call to action.

## Structure

1. **Lede / hook** (1-2 paragraphs): a vivid story, a startling fact, or a sharp framing of the news peg. Earn attention immediately. State or strongly imply the thesis fast - readers leave quickly.
2. **Thesis**: your position, unmistakable, by the end of the opening.
3. **The argument** (3-4 paragraphs): your reasons, each backed by evidence - data, expert voices, history, a telling anecdote. One idea per paragraph, building.
4. **Counterargument** (1 paragraph): name the strongest objection honestly and answer it. This is persuasion's secret weapon - it shows fairness and disarms skeptics. ("Critics will say X. They have a point, but...")
5. **Call to action / close**: what should change, who should do it, or how the reader should think differently. End on a memorable line that lands the thesis.

## Writing rules

- **Take a real stance.** Equivocation kills op-eds. Pick a side and defend it.
- **Evidence, not just assertion.** Back claims with facts; cite credibly.
- **Concrete over abstract.** A specific person or example beats a generalization.
- **Active, vigorous prose.** Short sentences for punch. Vary rhythm.
- **One argument.** Resist the urge to cover everything. Depth on one point beats breadth.
- **Anticipate objections** rather than ignoring them - it's more persuasive and more honest.
- **Memorable close.** The last line is what readers quote and remember.

## Voice and credibility

- Establish standing early - lived experience, expertise, or a stake in the outcome.
- Confident but not arrogant; passionate but reasoned. Reasonable people are persuadable.

## Anti-patterns

- No clear thesis (a "think piece" that decides nothing).
- All assertion, no evidence.
- Ignoring the obvious counterargument.
- A flat, summarizing ending.
- Trying to argue too many things at once.

## Output

Deliver the op-ed with a strong hook, an unmistakable thesis, evidence-backed body, a fair rebuttal, and a memorable close - within target length. Flag any factual claim that needs verification or a real source rather than stating it loosely.