Analyze and fix useCallback anti-patterns in your code
Scanned 9/1/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add simstudioai/sim --skill you-might-not-need-a-callback --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of You Might Not Need A Callback?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/simstudioai-you-might-not-need-a-callback)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: you-might-not-need-a-callback
description: Analyze and fix useCallback anti-patterns in your code
argument-hint: "[scope] [fix=true|false]"
---
# You Might Not Need a Callback
Arguments:
- scope: what to analyze (default: your current changes). Examples: "diff to main", "PR #123", "src/components/", "whole codebase"
- fix: whether to apply fixes (default: true). Set to false to only propose changes.
User arguments: $ARGUMENTS
## References
Read before analyzing:
1. https://react.dev/reference/react/useCallback — official docs on when useCallback is actually needed
## The one rule that matters
`useCallback` is only useful when **something observes the reference**. Ask: does anything care if this function gets a new identity on re-render?
Observers that care about reference stability:
- A `useEffect` that lists the function in its deps array
- A `useMemo` that lists the function in its deps array
- Another `useCallback` that lists the function in its deps array
- A child component wrapped in `React.memo` that receives the function as a prop
- A custom hook that documents a referential-stability requirement for the callback
If none of those apply — if the function is only called inline, or passed to a non-memoized child, or assigned to a native element event — the reference is unobserved and `useCallback` adds overhead with zero benefit.
## Anti-patterns to detect
1. **No observer tracks the reference**: The function is only called inline in the same component, or passed to a non-memoized child, or used as a native element handler (`<button onClick={fn}>`). Nothing re-runs or bails out based on reference identity. Remove `useCallback`.
2. **useCallback with deps that change every render**: If a dep is a plain object/array created inline, or state that changes on every interaction, memoization buys nothing — the function gets a new identity anyway.
3. **useCallback on handlers passed only to native elements**: `<button onClick={fn}>` — React never does reference equality on native element props. No benefit.
4. **useCallback wrapping functions that return new objects/arrays**: Stable function identity, unstable return value — memoization is at the wrong level. Use `useMemo` on the return value instead, or restructure.
5. **useCallback with empty deps when deps are needed**: Stale closure — reads initial values forever. This is a correctness bug, not just a performance issue.
6. **Pairing useCallback + React.memo on trivially cheap renders**: If the child renders in < 1ms and re-renders rarely, the memo infrastructure costs more than it saves.
7. **useCallback in custom hooks that don't need stable references**: Not every hook return needs to be memoized. Only stabilize callbacks when consumers depend on referential equality.
## Patterns that ARE correct — do not flag
- `useCallback` whose result is in a `useEffect` dep array — prevents the effect from re-running on every render
- `useCallback` whose result is in a `useMemo` dep array — prevents the memo from recomputing on every render
- `useCallback` whose result is a dep of another `useCallback` — stabilises a callback chain
- `useCallback` passed to a `React.memo`-wrapped child — the whole point of the pattern
- This codebase's ref pattern: `useRef` + callback with empty deps that reads the ref inside — correct, do not flag:
```tsx
const idRef = useRef(id)
useEffect(() => { idRef.current = id }, [id])
const fetchData = useCallback(async () => {
// use idRef.current instead of id
}, []) // empty deps because refs are used
```
## Steps
1. Read the reference above
2. Analyze the specified scope for the anti-patterns listed above
3. If fix=true, apply the fixes. If fix=false, propose the fixes without applying.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!