Use when creating or updating JS/TS performance evidence notes, iteration logs, research notes, generated docs/perf indexes, or searchable benchmark/result summaries.
Scanned 9/12/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add siliconjungle/-shapeshift-labs-evidence-kit --skill perf-wiki-builder --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Perf Wiki Builder?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/siliconjungle-perf-wiki-builder)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: perf-wiki-builder
description: Use when creating or updating JS/TS performance evidence notes, iteration logs, research notes, generated docs/perf indexes, or searchable benchmark/result summaries.
---
# Perf Wiki Builder
The perf wiki is a searchable evidence index over notes and benchmark rows.
## Workflow
1. Search existing memory before adding new notes:
```sh
npm run docs:perf:search -- <topic terms>
```
2. Add or update an iteration note under `iterations/`.
3. Add source maps or research notes under `research/` when external ideas shaped the work. If the note depends on external material, include the fetcher, manifest, cache path, URL, commit, or hash.
4. Ensure benchmark JSON lives under `benchmarks/results/*latest.json`.
5. Generate docs:
```sh
npx evidence-kit docs
```
6. Check generated docs before finishing:
```sh
npx evidence-kit docs --check
```
## Note Shape
Iteration notes should include:
- Goal
- Implemented
- Current Result
- Decision
- Deferred
- Verification
Use verdicts: `accepted`, `rejected`, `regressed`, `needs-revisit`, `measured`, `reference`, or `logged`.
## Rule
Historical notes are evidence, not current truth. For current API or performance claims, check current source and latest benchmark JSON.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
This skill provides comprehensive analysis of competitor SEO and GEO strategies, revealing what's working in your market and identifying opportunities to outperform the competition.
Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 7 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review...
Use when an operation issue is a Paperclip cursor-window, distill, or backfill — `operationType: "distill"` or `"backfill"` and the body references a Paperclip source bundle for a project or root issue. Turn raw Paperclip activity into a wiki-insightful project page, decisions log, and history note. This skill exists specifically to replace the stiff, datestamp-heavy templated output that the deterministic distiller produces.
Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory integrity verification, two-stage peer review, and reproducible quality gates. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publi...
Semantic search, similar content discovery, and structured research using Exa API