Plan and execute large refactors with dependency-aware work packets and parallel analysis.
Scanned 9/2/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills --skill orchestrate-batch-refactor --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Orchestrate Batch Refactor?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/sickn33-orchestrate-batch-refactor-agentic-awesome-skills)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: "orchestrate-batch-refactor"
description: "Plan and execute large refactors with dependency-aware work packets and parallel analysis."
risk: safe
source: "Dimillian/Skills (MIT)"
date_added: "2026-03-25"
---
# Orchestrate Batch Refactor
## Overview
Use this skill to run high-throughput refactors safely.
Analyze scope in parallel, synthesize a single plan, then execute independent work packets with sub-agents.
## When to Use
- When a refactor spans many files or subsystems and needs clear work partitioning.
- When you need dependency-aware planning before parallel implementation.
## Inputs
- Repo path and target scope (paths, modules, or feature area)
- Goal type: refactor, rewrite, or hybrid
- Constraints: behavior parity, API stability, deadlines, test requirements
## When to Use Parallelization
- Use this skill for medium/large scope touching many files or subsystems.
- Skip multi-agent execution for tiny edits or highly coupled single-file work.
## Core Workflow
1. Define scope and success criteria.
- List target paths/modules and non-goals.
- State behavior constraints (for example: preserve external behavior).
2. Run parallel analysis first.
- Split target scope into analysis lanes.
- Spawn `explorer` sub-agents in parallel to analyze each lane.
- Ask each agent for: intent map, coupling risks, candidate work packets, required validations.
3. Build one dependency-aware plan.
- Merge explorer output into a single work graph.
- Create work packets with clear file ownership and validation commands.
- Sequence packets by dependency level; run only independent packets in parallel.
4. Execute with worker agents.
- Spawn one `worker` per independent packet.
- Assign explicit ownership (files/responsibility).
- Instruct every worker that they are not alone in the codebase and must ignore unrelated edits.
5. Integrate and verify.
- Review packet outputs, resolve overlaps, and run validation gates.
- Run targeted tests per packet, then broader suite for integrated scope.
6. Report and close.
- Summarize packet outcomes, key refactors, conflicts resolved, and residual risks.
## Work Packet Rules
- One owner per file per execution wave.
- No parallel edits on overlapping file sets.
- Keep packet goals narrow and measurable.
- Include explicit done criteria and required checks.
- Prefer behavior-preserving refactors unless user explicitly requests behavior change.
## Planning Contract
Every packet must include:
1. Packet ID and objective.
2. Owned files.
3. Dependencies (none or packet IDs).
4. Risks and invariants to preserve.
5. Required checks.
6. Integration notes for main thread.
Use [`references/work-packet-template.md`](references/work-packet-template.md) for the exact shape.
## Agent Prompting Contract
- Use the prompt templates in [`references/agent-prompt-templates.md`](references/agent-prompt-templates.md).
- Explorer prompts focus on analysis and decomposition.
- Worker prompts focus on implementation and validation with strict ownership boundaries.
## Safety Guardrails
- Do not start worker execution before plan synthesis is complete.
- Do not parallelize across unresolved dependencies.
- Do not claim completion if any required packet check fails.
- Stop and re-plan when packet boundaries cause repeated merge conflicts.
## Validation Strategy
Run in this order:
1. Packet-level checks (fast and scoped).
2. Cross-packet integration checks.
3. Full project safety checks when scope is broad.
Prefer fast feedback loops, but never skip required behavior checks.
## Limitations
- Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
- Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
- Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!