Review MDPR Markdown presentation workflows with semantic hints, visual checks, and deterministic renderer boundaries.
Scanned 9/2/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills --skill mdpr-skill --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Mdpr Skill?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/sickn33-mdpr-skill)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: mdpr-skill
description: "Review MDPR Markdown presentation workflows with semantic hints, visual checks, and deterministic renderer boundaries."
category: productivity
risk: safe
source: community
source_repo: ch040602/mdpr-skill
source_type: community
date_added: "2026-07-01"
author: ch040602
tags: [mdpr, presentations, markdown, powerpoint, codex, visual-review, agent-hints]
tools: [claude, cursor, gemini, codex, antigravity]
license: "MIT"
license_source: "https://github.com/ch040602/mdpr-skill/blob/main/LICENSE"
---
# mdpr-skill
## Overview
Use this skill as the optional agent companion for
[MDPR](https://github.com/ch040602/MdPr), a deterministic
Markdown-to-presentation runtime. MDPR owns parsing, layout, theming,
validation, and final PPTX/HTML/PDF rendering. This skill helps an agent review
MDPR workflows, propose weak semantic hints, and explain visual findings without
taking control of slide geometry.
The upstream skill source is
[`ch040602/mdpr-skill`](https://github.com/ch040602/mdpr-skill), which includes
schemas, review commands, compatibility artifacts, visual evidence examples, and
MDPR boundary documentation.
## When to Use This Skill
- Use when the user asks about MDPR, `mdpresent`, Markdown-to-PPTX, or
Markdown presentation review.
- Use when generated MDPR artifacts need semantic, narrative, accessibility, or
visual review notes.
- Use when the user wants Codex-style presentation workflow hints while keeping
MDPR as the deterministic renderer.
- Use when comparing MDPR output against image-only deck generators such as a
codex-ppt style workflow.
- Use when a reusable theme or style-pack proposal should be expressed as an
approval-bound MDPR candidate instead of direct final slide edits.
## Core Boundary
- Let MDPR own parsing, slide splitting, recipes, layout, coordinates,
geometry, typography, colors, z-order, arrows, effects, exact icon assets,
renderer object IDs, and final PPTX objects.
- Keep agent output semantic, evidence-based, and schema-valid.
- Express fixes as Markdown cleanup, MDPR rulebook changes, config changes,
deterministic policy changes, or approval-bound proposals.
- Preserve the ability to build the same deck with all agent hints disabled.
- Do not mutate source Markdown unless the user explicitly asks for a cleaned
source draft.
## How It Works
### Step 1: Identify the MDPR Surface
Classify the user's request before producing advice:
- `semantic hints`: compact intent, grouping, importance, and icon-keyword
suggestions.
- `review report`: visual or narrative concerns grounded in rendered evidence,
manifests, or validation reports.
- `layout intent`: high-level layout goals from a summarized template catalog,
never concrete placeholder coordinates.
- `theme candidate`: reusable token and style-pack proposal for later MDPR
approval/import gates.
- `codex-ppt compatibility`: feature mapping and comparison notes only; do not
turn MDPR into a full-slide image renderer.
### Step 2: Ground Every Finding
Reference available evidence such as:
- source Markdown path or heading text
- MDPR manifest summaries
- rendered preview image paths
- validation report IDs
- source notes or citation metadata
- schema names such as `agent-hint.json`, `review-report.json`, or
`mdpr-theme-candidate-v1`
If evidence is missing, say what artifact is needed instead of inventing a
pass/fail result.
### Step 3: Keep Hints Weak
Allowed hints:
- slide or section intent
- content grouping
- relative importance
- icon-search keywords
- accessibility or citation review notes
- generated-image candidate briefs when an icon would be too small or too
semantically ambiguous
Disallowed hints:
- final coordinates, sizes, z-order, geometry, or object IDs
- exact colors, typography, arrows, effects, or icon asset choices
- final layout IDs or placeholder IDs
- pass/fail validation decisions not backed by MDPR validation
### Step 4: Route Fixes to MDPR-Owned Changes
When repeated issues appear, recommend a deterministic follow-up surface:
- Markdown cleanup
- MDPR rulebook change
- MDPR config/profile change
- MDPR theme-pack registration
- MDPR validation improvement
- approval-bound deck-local override or style-pack candidate
## Useful Local Commands
Run these only when the upstream `mdpr-skill` CLI is available in the current
workspace and the referenced input files exist.
```bash
node bin/mdpr-skill.js hint --source-sha256 <64hex> --out .mdpresent/proposals/agent-hint.json
node bin/mdpr-skill.js review --manifest dist/mdpresent-manifest.json --out .mdpresent/review/review-report.json
node bin/mdpr-skill.js narrative --markdown deck.md --manifest dist/mdpresent-manifest.json --out .mdpresent/review/narrative-review.json
node bin/mdpr-skill.js layout-intent --layout-catalog template-layout-catalog.json --out .mdpresent/review/layout-intent.json
node bin/mdpr-skill.js accessibility --markdown deck.md --audience "executive review" --out .mdpresent/review/accessibility-review.json
```
## Examples
### Review a Rendered MDPR Deck
1. Read the source Markdown, manifest summary, rendered image list, and any
validation report.
2. Separate source-content problems from renderer/rulebook problems.
3. Report only evidence-backed visual concerns.
4. Recommend deterministic MDPR fixes when the same issue repeats.
```markdown
Finding: Slide 4 has weak visual hierarchy between the metric and explanation.
Evidence: rendered/slide-04.png, manifest slide id `s4`, heading "Revenue Mix".
MDPR-owned fix: adjust the metric-card recipe spacing rule or choose a
deterministic layout profile with stronger numeric emphasis.
```
### Propose a Theme Candidate
1. Treat the source design as a visual system, not content to copy.
2. Extract reusable tokens, semantic layout blueprints, decoration grammar, and
best-fit scenarios.
3. Emit an approval-bound `mdpr-theme-candidate-v1`.
4. Keep `mdprOwnsFinalLayout`, `mdprOwnsFinalThemeBinding`, and
`noRawUseInAgentHints` true.
```json
{
"schema": "mdpr-theme-candidate-v1",
"source": "rendered reference set approved by user",
"useCases": ["executive review", "research update"],
"constraints": {
"mdprOwnsFinalLayout": true,
"mdprOwnsFinalThemeBinding": true,
"noRawUseInAgentHints": true
}
}
```
### Compare with codex-ppt Style Workflows
Use codex-ppt only as a capability reference or image-only baseline. Preserve
the output-model distinction: codex-ppt style workflows may produce full-slide
images, while MDPR defaults to editable PPTX/HTML/PDF with deterministic
validation.
```markdown
Comparison note: codex-ppt style output may optimize for a single rasterized
slide image. MDPR should instead preserve editable slide objects and route
visual improvements through recipes, themes, and validation policies.
```
## Best Practices
- Do: Prefer concise semantic hints over restating the source.
- Do: Keep review notes actionable for MDPR maintainers.
- Do: Call out missing evidence before making quality claims.
- Do: Treat LLM judgment as triage only; MDPR validation remains the release
gate.
- Avoid: Turning generated asset prompts into final asset selections.
- Avoid: Recommending raw colors, coordinates, or renderer object IDs from
agent judgment alone.
## Limitations
- This skill does not replace MDPR runtime validation.
- This skill does not generate final slide coordinates or final PPTX objects.
- This skill does not make MDPR depend on an LLM.
- This skill should not be used to copy private deck designs or proprietary
slide content.
## Common Pitfalls
- **Problem:** Treating mdpr-skill output as final slide layout.
**Solution:** Keep hints semantic and let MDPR choose final layout, geometry,
and renderer objects.
- **Problem:** Reporting visual issues without evidence.
**Solution:** Link each finding to source Markdown, a manifest entry, rendered
previews, validation reports, or another concrete artifact.
- **Problem:** Copying codex-ppt image-only behavior into MDPR.
**Solution:** Use image-only generators as comparison baselines while
preserving MDPR's editable PPTX/HTML/PDF output model.
## Security & Safety Notes
- Review only files the user has provided or authorized.
- Do not fetch private references, credentials, or paid assets without explicit
permission.
- Do not include secrets, API keys, or private source content in generated
review reports or theme candidates.
- Treat all CLI commands as local workspace commands; confirm input paths exist
before running them.
## Related Skills
- `@frontend-slides` - Use for browser-native HTML presentation generation.
- `@2slides-ppt-generator` - Use for hosted API-based presentation generation.
- `@office-productivity` - Use for broader document, spreadsheet, and slide
workflow coordination.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!