Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Merge Feedback

ASecurity

Synthesize this session's preferences/corrections into tasks/feedback.md and merge them into the existing file without ever deleting prior points. One job — the feedback artifact only. Called by end-session and by start-session's mid-session auto-capture; can also run standalone. Triggers: merge feedback, update feedback.md, capture preferences, record corrections.

2 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/28/2026
ai-agentsgobash

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/28/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add shashankreddy509/claude-tdd-kit --skill merge-feedback --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Merge Feedback?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Merge Feedback
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/shashankreddy509-merge-feedback/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/shashankreddy509-merge-feedback)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Files
SKILL.md
---
name: merge-feedback
description: Synthesize this session's preferences/corrections into tasks/feedback.md and merge them into the existing file without ever deleting prior points. One job — the feedback artifact only. Called by end-session and by start-session's mid-session auto-capture; can also run standalone. Triggers: merge feedback, update feedback.md, capture preferences, record corrections.
allowed-tools: Read, Bash, Edit
---

# Merge Feedback

One job: take what this session revealed about how the user wants to work and merge it into
`tasks/feedback.md` as a new dated section, preserving everything already there. This is a Utility —
the feedback artifact, every time. It does NOT write session-notes or the memory vault (end-session
owns those and calls this only for the feedback piece).

## Steps

1. **Read the existing `tasks/feedback.md`** if it exists. You must see the current content before
   writing — the merge rule depends on it.

2. **Synthesize this session's observations** into the five sections below. Scan the FULL
   conversation, not just recent turns. Be specific — paraphrase the actual correction/preference,
   not vague generalities. Keep each bullet ≤ 20 words. No code snippets or implementation details —
   behavioral/communication patterns only. (A genuinely technical, non-behavioral gotcha belongs in
   the memory vault, which end-session handles — don't force it into feedback.md.)

3. **Write a new dated section** at the TOP of the file (most recent first), using today's date:

```markdown
# Session Feedback — {YYYY-MM-DD}

## Preferences
- [concise bullet per preference observed]

## Corrections I Made
- [exact correction → what to do instead]

## What Worked Well
- [approaches the user accepted without pushback or praised]

## What to Avoid
- [behaviors the user pushed back on or corrected]

## System Instructions for Future Sessions
- [imperative rule a future session can follow immediately]
- ...
```

4. **Patch the skill that was running.** A correction recorded only as prose in `feedback.md` does
   not reach the skill that produced the mistake — the next invocation repeats it. So for each
   correction captured in step 2, ask: *was a named skill driving when this happened?* If yes, also
   append the lesson as one line to a `## Gotchas` section in THAT skill's own `SKILL.md` (create the
   section at the end of the file if absent).

   Write the gotcha as an imperative rule with its trigger, not a story: "Before X, check Y — Z fails
   silently otherwise." One line each. Skip this step entirely when no skill was driving; a
   correction from ordinary conversation belongs in `feedback.md` only.

   **Guards on this step — it must not sprawl:**
   - Only a skill that was ACTUALLY named or invoked this session. Never infer which skill "would
     have" been relevant, and never patch a second skill because it looks related.
   - Append only. Never rewrite, reorder, or delete existing skill content — the never-delete rule
     applies here exactly as it does to `feedback.md`.
   - Skip a lesson already covered by an existing gotcha line in that file. Read before appending.
   - **Plugin skills:** patch the plugin's SOURCE repo (wherever it is cloned), never the
     `~/.claude/plugins/cache/` copy — the cache is overwritten on reinstall and hand-editing it
     desyncs source, marketplace clone, and cache. After patching a plugin skill, say in the report
     that a version bump plus a per-machine `/plugin` reinstall is required for the change to take
     effect; do not perform either.
   - Report every file touched. A silent skill edit is worse than no edit.

## Merge rules (the heart of this skill — never violate)

- The final file MUST be a SUPERSET of the previous version plus what's new this session.
- **NEVER delete an existing point.** Only add or merge.
- If a new observation overlaps an existing point, MERGE them into one combined bullet — do not keep
  both, and do not drop either.
- Collapse within-session duplicates: if the user corrected the same thing twice, one rule covers it.
- Prior dated sections stay intact below the new one. Don't rewrite history; only the new section is
  authored, except where a merge folds a new point into an older bullet.
- If the file has grown unwieldy over many sessions, DON'T hand-trim it here (that risks dropping a
  point) — that is `condense-feedback`'s job, which ships alongside this skill and is the only thing
  allowed to shrink the file. This skill only ever adds/merges.

## Self-check (correctness — the superset gate; report PASS/FAIL)

After writing, verify the never-delete rule held. **PASS iff** every bullet that existed in the prior
`tasks/feedback.md` still exists in the new file (verbatim or folded into a merged bullet that
preserves its meaning) — i.e. the new file is a SUPERSET. **FAIL** listing any prior bullet that was
dropped or whose meaning was lost. Practical check: the new file's line/bullet count under each prior
dated section must be >= the old count (a merge that combined two bullets into one is the only
allowed decrease — call it out explicitly when it happens). Report `SUPERSET-CHECK: PASS` or `FAIL —
<dropped bullets>`. A FAIL means restore the dropped points before finishing.

## Notes

- If the date isn't otherwise known, get it from the environment/context — do not invent one.
- This skill writes `tasks/feedback.md`, plus — via step 4 only — a `## Gotchas` line in a skill that
  was actually driving when a correction happened. That second write is the same job, not a second
  one: recording a correction where it will actually be enforced. It does NOT extend to
  session-notes or the memory vault; those stay end-session's job.
- Standalone use = mid-session auto-capture (start-session's rule): when the user gives a correction
  or durable preference, call this immediately so it's on disk before any `/compact`.
- The superset gate matches bullets as LINES, so a merge that rewraps a bullet across two lines reads as DROPPED. Before reporting FAIL, re-check each flagged bullet's clauses against the flattened new file; a merge is the one allowed decrease and must be named as one, not filed as a loss.

Attribution

shashankreddy509shashankreddy509
View sourceMore from shashankreddy509 →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Related Skills

Caveman

Ultra-compressed communication mode that cuts output tokens while keeping technical accuracy. Levels: lite, full, ultra and the wenyan variants. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief" or "less tokens".

1074701 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

695601 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3351 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

691 votes

math-skill

A comprehensive mathematical reasoning skill for AI assistants — handles arithmetic to research-level problems with rigorous step-by-step reasoning, systematic verification, and transparent uncertainty handling

381 votes
View all in ai-agents →