Skip to content
Back to skills

Temper

ASecurity

Use when the workflow feels over-engineered, has premature optimizations, unnecessary abstraction layers, or complexity beyond actual requirements.

  • 415 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 1 copy
  • 2 views
  • Added May 27, 2026
data-aigorailsperformance

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned May 27, 2026

npx -y skills add sharpdeveye/maestro --skill temper --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Temper?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Temper
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/sharpdeveye-temper/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/sharpdeveye-temper)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: temper
description: "Use when the workflow feels over-engineered, has premature optimizations, unnecessary abstraction layers, or complexity beyond actual requirements."
argument-hint: "[target]"
category: enhancement
version: 2.0.0
user-invocable: true
---

## MANDATORY PREPARATION

Invoke /agent-workflow — it contains workflow principles, anti-patterns, and the **Context Gathering Protocol**. Follow the protocol before proceeding — if no workflow context exists yet, you MUST run /teach-maestro first.
Consult the agent-architecture reference in the agent-workflow skill for topology patterns and when multi-agent is justified.


---

Pull back from over-engineering. The most common mistake isn't building too little — it's building too much.

### Over-Engineering Detection

**Signs you've over-engineered:**

- Multi-agent for a single-agent problem
- Premature optimization before you have performance data
- Abstraction layers with one implementation
- Configuration for things that never change
- Evaluation loops on non-critical outputs
- Framework before features

### The Complexity Test

For each component:

1. **Is this solving a problem we actually have?** (not "might have")
2. **Is this the simplest solution that works?**
3. **Would removing this break anything?** (if not, remove it)
4. **Can someone new understand this in 5 minutes?** (if not, simplify)

### Tempering Strategies

**Collapse Unnecessary Agents**

```text
OVER-ENGINEERED: User → Classifier → Router → Specialist → Formatter → Checker (6 components)
TEMPERED: User → Single Agent with good prompt (1 component, same quality)
```

**Remove Premature Abstraction**

```text
OVER-ENGINEERED: class AgentOrchestrator with 5 strategy interfaces
TEMPERED: async function runWorkflow(input) — direct, readable
```

**Simplify Configuration**

```text
OVER-ENGINEERED: config.yaml (200 lines, 47 params, 3 inheritance levels)
TEMPERED: config.yaml (20 lines, essential params only, sensible defaults)
```

### What NOT to Temper

- Error handling — essential, not overhead
- Logging — saves you when things go wrong
- Input validation — prevents cascading failures
- Core guardrails — safety is non-negotiable
- The golden test set — how you know it still works

### Recommended Next Step

After tempering, run `/evaluate` to confirm quality is preserved, or `/diagnose` for a full health check.

**NEVER**:

- Temper without measuring output quality before and after
- Remove error handling in the name of simplicity
- Simplify below the level of correctness
- Remove features users actively rely on

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.