Skip to content
Back to skills

Refine

ASecurity

Use when the workflow works but needs polish, or as the final step in a diagnose → fix → refine cycle before shipping.

  • 415 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 2 views
  • Added May 27, 2026
data-aigo

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned May 27, 2026

npx -y skills add sharpdeveye/maestro --skill refine --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Refine?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Refine
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/sharpdeveye-refine/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/sharpdeveye-refine)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: refine
description: "Use when the workflow works but needs polish, or as the final step in a diagnose → fix → refine cycle before shipping."
argument-hint: "[target area]"
category: fix
version: 2.0.0
user-invocable: true
---

## MANDATORY PREPARATION

Invoke /agent-workflow — it contains workflow principles, anti-patterns, and the **Context Gathering Protocol**. Follow the protocol before proceeding — if no workflow context exists yet, you MUST run /teach-maestro first.

---

This is the final quality pass. The workflow works — now make it excellent.

### Refinement Checklist

**Prompts**

- [ ] Every prompt follows the 4-zone pattern (role, context, instructions, output)
- [ ] Output schemas are explicit and validated
- [ ] Negative instructions clarify what NOT to do
- [ ] No contradictory instructions
- [ ] Few-shot examples included for ambiguous tasks
- [ ] Chain-of-thought used for multi-step reasoning tasks

**Tool Descriptions**

- [ ] Every tool has a multi-line description: what, when to use, when NOT to use, returns
- [ ] Input parameters have descriptions and types
- [ ] Error responses are documented
- [ ] At least one example input/output in the description

**Error Messages**

- [ ] Error messages are specific (not "an error occurred")
- [ ] Error messages suggest corrective action
- [ ] Errors include context (what was being attempted)
- [ ] Errors are structured (code + message + details)

**Logging**

- [ ] Every model call is logged (input tokens, output tokens, latency, cost)
- [ ] Tool calls are logged with inputs and outputs
- [ ] Errors are logged with full context
- [ ] PII is redacted from logs
- [ ] Workflow ID traces through all log entries

**Configuration**

- [ ] All magic numbers are named constants
- [ ] Environment-specific values are in config, not code
- [ ] Defaults are sensible — config is for overrides
- [ ] Cost ceilings are set
- [ ] Timeout values are set for all external calls

### Output

For each checklist item that fails, provide:

1. What's wrong (specific finding)
2. Where it is (file, line, or component)
3. How to fix it (concrete suggestion)
4. Priority (critical / important / nice-to-have)

### Priority Matrix

| Priority | Criteria | Maestro Action |
|----------|---------|----------------|
| Critical | Affects correctness or safety | `/fortify` or `/guard` before shipping |
| Important | Affects quality or maintainability | `/calibrate` in current cycle |
| Nice-to-have | Cosmetic or minor inconsistency | Note for next `/refine` pass |

### Recommended Next Step

After refinement is complete, run `/evaluate` to verify the polished workflow against realistic scenarios.

**NEVER**:

- Skip the checklist — go through every item
- Mark items as passing without checking
- Suggest changes that alter behavior (this is polish, not redesign)
- Refine before the workflow is functionally correct (fix first, refine last)

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.