Synthesize multiple sources — articles, reports, notes, transcripts — into one structured brief with themes, agreements, contradictions, and gaps. Use when the user says "synthesize this research", "combine these sources", "what do these articles agree on", or has a folder of collected material and needs one coherent picture.
Scanned 8/30/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add sgharlow/claude-code-recipes --skill research-synthesis --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Research Synthesis?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/sgharlow-research-synthesis)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: research-synthesis
description: Synthesize multiple sources — articles, reports, notes, transcripts — into one structured brief with themes, agreements, contradictions, and gaps. Use when the user says "synthesize this research", "combine these sources", "what do these articles agree on", or has a folder of collected material and needs one coherent picture.
---
# Research Synthesis
Merge a pile of sources into a single brief that shows where the sources agree, where they
conflict, and what none of them answer. Synthesis is cross-source structure — not a stack
of per-source summaries.
## Steps
1. Inventory the sources: list every file or link the user provides with a one-line
description and its type (primary data, reporting, opinion, marketing). Confirm the
research question the synthesis must answer — without one, ask before reading further.
2. Read each source, capturing per source: its main claims, the evidence offered, its date,
and any obvious bias or interest.
3. Build the synthesis across sources:
- **Themes** — 3–6 recurring threads, each citing which sources support it.
- **Consensus** — claims multiple independent sources agree on (note when "agreement"
is really one origin quoted many times).
- **Contradictions** — where sources conflict, shown side by side with each side's
evidence; do not silently resolve a conflict by picking a winner.
- **Gaps** — what the research question needs that no source answers.
- **Bottom line** — 3–5 sentences answering the research question, at the confidence
the evidence actually supports.
4. Verify: every claim in the brief carries a source attribution; any claim traceable to
only one source is marked `single-source`. If two sources' dates differ by years, flag
which may be stale rather than averaging them.
## Constraints
- Never pad thin evidence into a confident conclusion — "the sources don't establish this"
is a valid and often the correct bottom line.
- Keep the brief under two pages; the per-source inventory goes in an appendix, not the body.
Full walkthrough, examples, and variations: `recipes/Recipe-007-Research-Synthesis.md`.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!