A skill for designing actions where the punishment reveals the nature of the oppressor, turning overreaction into your message.
Scanned 9/8/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add sethmblack/paks-skills --skill disproportionate-response --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Disproportionate Response?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/sethmblack-disproportionate-response)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: disproportionate-response
description: A skill for designing actions where the punishment reveals the nature of the oppressor, turning overreaction into your message.
license: MIT
metadata:
author: sethmblack
version: 1.0.3841
repository: https://github.com/sethmblack/paks-skills
keywords:
- disproportionate-response
- escalation
- storytelling
- writing
---
# Disproportionate Response
A skill for designing actions where the punishment reveals the nature of the oppressor, turning overreaction into your message.
## When to Use
- When authorities are likely to overreact
- When the contrast between your action and their response makes a point
- When you're willing to endure consequences to expose the system
- When the audience is watching how power responds
## Inputs
| Input | Required | Description |
|-------|----------|-------------|
| input_data | Yes | The primary data or content to analyze |
| context | No | Additional background or constraints (default: none) |
| output_format | No | Preferred format for results (default: structured markdown) |
## Workflow
### Step 1: Phase 1: Understand the Overreaction Pattern
Study how the target typically responds to challenge:
- What triggers maximum response?
- What rhetoric accompanies crackdowns?
- How have they responded to similar actions?
- Where is their sensitivity highest?
The action should be calibrated to trigger revealing response.
### Step 2: Phase 2: Design for Contrast
Create maximum gap between action and response:
- Peaceful action vs. violent response
- Brief gesture vs. years of punishment
- Symbolic transgression vs. existential threat framing
- Individual act vs. mobilization of state power
The audience should think: "All this, for that?"
### Step 3: Phase 3: Be Genuinely Non-Threatening
The action itself must be clearly proportionate:
- No actual violence or threat
- No legitimate security concern
- Symbolic or expressive only
- The overreaction must be purely the oppressor's choice
If your action was actually dangerous, the response is not disproportion.
### Step 4: Phase 4: Prepare to Document
The overreaction only works if seen:
- Cameras ready for the response
- Witnesses in place
- International attention alerted in advance
- Rapid distribution channels prepared
An unseen overreaction is just suffering without purpose.
### Step 5: Phase 5: Frame the Narrative
Shape how the contrast is understood:
- Pre-written statements for media
- Clear framing of disproportion
- Specific demands or messages attached
- Make the overreaction prove your point
"They gave us X years for Y seconds" - the sentence writes itself.
## Output Format
A disproportionate response strategy including:
1. The action and its genuine non-threatening nature
2. Expected overreaction and evidence it's likely
3. The contrast to be highlighted
4. Documentation and distribution plan
5. Narrative framing prepared
6. Acceptance of personal consequences
## Constraints
- You are accepting real consequences - be prepared
- Don't manufacture fake martyrdom
- The action must be genuinely defensible
- Consider whether overreaction will actually come or be seen
- Some contexts make overreaction invisible - this won't work there
## Outputs
**Primary Output:** A structured analysis document that identifies and articulates patterns, insights, and actionable recommendations based on the input data.
**Format:**
```markdown
## Analysis: [Topic]
### Key Findings
- [Finding 1]
- [Finding 2]
- [Finding 3]
### Recommendations
1. [Action 1]
2. [Action 2]
3. [Action 3]
```
**Example output:** See the Example section below for a complete demonstration.
## Additional Notes
**Best practices:**
- Use this skill when the situation clearly matches its intended use cases
- Combine with related skills for comprehensive analysis
- Iterate on outputs if initial results don't fully meet requirements
**Common variations:**
- Adjust the depth of analysis based on available time and information
- Scale the approach for different levels of complexity
- Adapt the output format to audience needs
**When to skip this skill:**
- The situation doesn't match the core use cases
- Simpler approaches would be more appropriate
- Time constraints require faster methods
## Example
**Input**: Design action exposing authoritarian response to peaceful protest
**Output**:
"Action: Stand silently in public square holding a blank piece of white paper. Nothing written. Just white paper. Expected response: Based on precedent, authorities will arrest for 'provocation' even though nothing is written - the blankness is read as protest. Contrast: Person arrested for holding blank paper. The charge itself proves the point - in this system, even saying nothing is criminal. Documentation: Multiple cameras from surrounding buildings, live-stream to international platforms, press alerted in advance. Narrative: 'They arrested me for holding nothing. What does that tell you?' Personal consequence accepted: Fine or brief detention expected, prepared for escalation."
## Integration
Works with:
- **spectacular-transgression**: Often designed to provoke disproportionate response
- **documentation-as-resistance**: Recording the response is essential
- **collective-action-design**: Multiple people facing disproportionate response amplifiesIs this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!