GitHub issue and PR investigator. Pulls open issues/PRs, classifies them, searches the codebase for root cause or reviews contributed code, proposes fixes with file:line references, and optionally implements fixes. Use for investigating GitHub issues and reviewing PRs; do NOT use for general code review unrelated to GitHub issues.
Scanned 6/12/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add SethGammon/Citadel --skill triage --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Triage?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/sethgammon-triage)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: triage
license: MIT
description: >-
GitHub issue and PR investigator. Pulls open issues/PRs, classifies them, searches
the codebase for root cause or reviews contributed code, proposes fixes with file:line
references, and optionally implements fixes. Use for investigating GitHub issues and
reviewing PRs; do NOT use for general code review unrelated to GitHub issues.
user-invocable: true
auto-trigger: false
trigger_keywords:
- triage
- open issues
- unlabeled issues
- review pr
- review prs
- investigate issue
effort: high
last-updated: 2026-03-24
---
# Triage — GitHub Issue & PR Investigator
## When to Use
**Don't use when:** fixing a specific already-diagnosed issue (use /marshal); monitoring a single PR's CI (use /pr-watch); reviewing code quality outside of GitHub issues (use /review).
- `/triage` — triage all open, unlabeled issues
- `/triage 10` — investigate issue #10 specifically
- `/triage pr 13` — review PR #13
- `/triage prs` — review all open PRs
- `/triage --batch` — pull all open issues, classify, investigate, report
- `/triage --stale` — find issues older than 14 days with no activity
- After the `issue-monitor` SessionStart hook reports new issues
## Codex PR review integration
For Codex-visible PRs, decide whether to use native `@codex review`, local Citadel triage, or both:
```bash
node scripts/codex-pr-review.js plan --repo <owner/repo> --pr <number> --risk <low|medium|high|local-only> --write
```
Use native `@codex review` when the diff is GitHub-visible and the main need is a focused P0/P1 review. Use local Citadel triage when the answer depends on unpushed files, local generated artifacts, or hands-on edits. Use both for large or risky PRs.
After Codex posts a GitHub review, fetch and ingest the review comments before deciding merge readiness:
```bash
node scripts/codex-review-fetch.js --repo <owner/repo> --pr <number> --write
```
Use `--file <review-comments.json>` with the same script when working from exported/offline review data.
Treat ingested P0/P1 findings as blockers until local verification confirms they are fixed or not applicable.
## Inputs
| Input | Source | Required |
|-------|--------|----------|
| Issue/PR number | Argument (e.g., `/triage 10`, `/triage pr 13`) | No — omit to triage all open |
| Mode | `pr` prefix for PRs | No — defaults to issues |
| Repo | Auto-detected from git remote | Yes (auto) |
| gh CLI | `"/c/Program Files/GitHub CLI/gh.exe"` on Windows, `gh` elsewhere | Yes (auto) |
## Execution Protocol
### Phase 0 — Environment Setup
1. Detect repo from `git remote get-url origin`, extract `owner/repo`
2. Verify `gh` auth status
3. Set `$GH`: Windows → `"/c/Program Files/GitHub CLI/gh.exe"`, other → `gh`
### Phase 1 — Issue Intake
**Single issue** (`/triage 10`):
```
$GH issue view <number> --repo <owner/repo> --json number,title,body,labels,state,comments,createdAt,updatedAt,author,assignees
```
**Batch** (`/triage` or `--batch`):
```
$GH issue list --repo <owner/repo> --state open --json number,title,labels,createdAt,updatedAt --limit 50
```
Filter to untriaged: issues with no labels, or missing priority/type label.
**Stale** (`--stale`):
```
$GH issue list --repo <owner/repo> --state open --json number,title,labels,createdAt,updatedAt --limit 100
```
Filter to issues with no activity in 14+ days.
**Single PR** (`/triage pr 13`):
```
$GH pr view <number> --repo <owner/repo> --json number,title,body,author,state,files,commits,comments,createdAt,headRefName,baseRefName,mergeable,reviewDecision
$GH pr diff <number> --repo <owner/repo>
```
**All PRs** (`/triage prs`):
```
$GH pr list --repo <owner/repo> --state open --json number,title,author,createdAt,labels --limit 50
```
### Phase 1b — PR Review Protocol
#### PR Classification
| Type | Signal |
|------|--------|
| `bugfix` | Fixes a reported issue, closes #N |
| `feature` | Adds new functionality |
| `refactor` | Restructures without changing behavior |
| `docs` | Documentation only |
| `infra` | CI/CD, build, packaging, installer |
#### PR Review Checklist
1. Read the full diff — not just the PR description.
2. Check for regressions against closed issues and recent commits.
3. Check for conflicts with in-flight work (same files as open PRs).
4. Verify the approach: correct solution, not overly complex.
5. Check cross-platform: Unix assumptions, Windows path handling.
6. Check conventions against existing project patterns.
7. Check for scope creep beyond the PR title.
#### PR Resolution
Write a per-PR resolution block (full template: docs/TRIAGE.md#pr-resolution-template) with:
- Author, type, files changed count, mergeable status
- What it does (1-3 sentences)
- Review findings, each with a file:line reference
- Issues found, split into **Critical** (blocks merge) and **Non-critical** (nice to fix, not blocking)
- Recommendation checkbox: Approve / Request changes (with the specific changes needed) / Close (with reason)
#### PR Actions
**IMPORTANT:** All PR actions are external. Show the user the exact comment text and get approval before posting.
### Phase 2 — Classification
**Type** (exactly one):
| Type | Signal |
|------|--------|
| `bug` | Error messages, "doesn't work", stack traces, regression |
| `feature` | "Would be nice", "add support for" |
| `question` | "How do I", "is it possible" |
| `docs` | README/documentation issues |
| `infra` | CI/CD, build, packaging, dependencies |
**Severity** (bugs only):
| Severity | Criteria |
|----------|----------|
| `critical` | Blocks installation or core functionality for all users |
| `high` | Breaks a major feature or affects many users |
| `medium` | Breaks a minor feature or has a workaround |
| `low` | Cosmetic, edge case, or easy workaround |
**Affected Component:**
- Citadel hooks / skills / agents
- `.claude/harness.json` — project configuration
- `.planning/` — planning/campaign system
- `docs/` — documentation
- Root files — project setup
### Phase 3 — Investigation
#### 3a. Parse the Report
Extract: error messages, environment, reproduction steps, expected vs actual behavior, workarounds.
#### 3b. Search the Codebase
1. Grep for exact error messages / error codes
2. Read files named in the issue
3. Find functions named in stack traces
4. Search for the bug class or anti-pattern
5. `git log --oneline -20 -- <affected-files>` for recent changes
6. Cross-reference similar issues
#### 3c. Root Cause Analysis
For bugs:
1. What breaks — the specific code path
2. Why it breaks — root cause, not symptom
3. When introduced — git blame / log
4. Who is affected — scope
5. The fix — file:line references
For features/questions:
1. Already possible? Search existing functionality.
2. Where would it go? Which component/layer.
3. Effort: trivial / small / medium / large
4. Blockers: dependencies, architecture constraints
#### 3d. Reproduce (when possible)
Set up conditions, run the failing command, confirm error matches, verify proposed fix resolves it.
### Phase 4 — Resolution Plan
Write a per-issue resolution plan (full template: docs/TRIAGE.md#issue-resolution-plan-template) with:
- Type, severity, component, reproducible (yes / no / not-attempted)
- Root cause: 1-3 sentences explaining WHY
- Affected code: `<file>:<line>` entries with what is wrong at each
- Proposed fix: specific code changes with file:line references
- Impact: who is affected, whether a workaround exists, whether it is a breaking change
- Recommended action checkbox: Fix in next release / Needs more info from reporter / Won't fix (with reason) / Duplicate of #N
### Phase 5 — Action
**Auto-fix** when: root cause clear and verified, fix contained to 1-3 files, no breaking changes, no architectural decisions needed.
Steps:
1. Branch: `fix/issue-<number>-<slug>`
2. Implement fix
3. Run typecheck/build
4. Commit: `fix: <description> (closes #<number>)`
5. Push and open PR linking the issue
6. Comment on the issue with the PR link
**Comment with findings** when fix needs discussion or user input: post root cause analysis, proposed fix, and questions.
**Label only** for questions/docs/features: add type + priority labels, optionally point to existing docs.
### Phase 6 — Report
Output a Triage Summary table with columns `# | Title | Type | Severity | Action | Status`, one row per triaged item (example: docs/TRIAGE.md#triage-summary-example).
## Label Taxonomy
Apply via `$GH issue edit <number> --add-label "<label>"`:
**Type:** `bug`, `feature`, `question`, `docs`, `infra`
**Severity (bugs):** `critical`, `high`, `medium`, `low`
**Status:** `needs-info`, `confirmed`, `wont-fix`, `duplicate`
## Auto-fix Handoff
```
---PR READY---
PR #<N>: <url>
To watch this PR automatically:
Local → /pr-watch <N>
Cloud → open in Claude Code web or mobile, toggle "Auto fix" ON
---
```
## Contextual Gates
**Disclosure:** "Triaging GitHub issues and PRs. Read-only — no changes made without showing you first."
**Reversibility:** green — investigation is read-only; any GitHub actions (labels, comments, PRs) shown to user for approval before posting
**Trust gates:**
- Any: view triage report; all external actions require explicit approval
## Quality Gates
- [ ] Every issue has a classification (type + severity for bugs)
- [ ] Every bug has root cause with file:line references
- [ ] Every auto-fix passes typecheck and build
- [ ] Every PR links to the issue it fixes
- [ ] Every issue has at least a label or comment
- [ ] No issue comment is generic or substanceless
## Fringe Cases
**gh not available or not authenticated:** Stop and instruct: "Run `gh auth login` before using /triage."
**No open issues or PRs:** Report "No open issues found." and exit cleanly.
**Empty/unparseable issue body:** Classify as `needs-info`, comment requesting reproduction steps.
**`.planning/` missing:** /triage reads from GitHub, not local state. Skip .planning/ writes if missing.
## Anti-Patterns — Do NOT
- Post generic comments without substance
- Propose fixes without reading the actual code
- Label without investigating
- Auto-fix when root cause is unclear
- Close issues without explanation
- Guess at fixes — verify by reading code and running checks
## gh CLI Notes
- Windows: `"/c/Program Files/GitHub CLI/gh.exe"` — always pass `--repo <owner/repo>`
- Comments: `$GH issue comment <number> --repo <owner/repo> --body "..."`
- Labels: `$GH issue edit <number> --repo <owner/repo> --add-label "bug,high"`
## Exit Protocol
```
---HANDOFF---
- Triaged N issues: X bugs, Y features, Z questions
- Auto-fixed: <list of issue numbers with PR links>
- Needs attention: <list of issues requiring human decision>
- New labels applied: <count>
- Reversibility: green — investigation read-only; auto-fix PRs can be closed/reverted if unwanted
---
```
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!