龙虎榜深度分析器。识别游资席位、判断机构 vs 游资博弈、对照同板块龙虎榜找辨识度龙头。当用户问"谁在买这只票/最近龙虎榜怎么样/X游资有没有上榜/这是不是X的票"时使用。
Scanned 9/2/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add Serennity007/awesome-stock-quant-skills --skill lhb-analyzer --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Lhb Analyzer?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/serennity007-lhb-analyzer)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: lhb-analyzer
description: 龙虎榜深度分析器。识别游资席位、判断机构 vs 游资博弈、对照同板块龙虎榜找辨识度龙头。当用户问"谁在买这只票/最近龙虎榜怎么样/X游资有没有上榜/这是不是X的票"时使用。
version: 3.9.4
author: FloatFu-true
license: MIT
metadata:
hermes:
tags: [finance, a-share, lhb, hot-money, market-microstructure]
related_skills: [deep-analysis]
---
# 龙虎榜深度分析
## 调用上下文
输入:股票代码或个股名
输出:龙虎榜分析 + 游资识别 + 同板块对比
## 数据流
1. 调用 `scripts/fetch_lhb.py {ticker}` 拿到原始龙虎榜数据
2. 调用 `lib/seat_db.py::match_seats_in_lhb()` 识别游资席位
3. 用 `lib/seat_db.py::is_in_range()` 判断该游资是否在射程内
4. 拉取同板块龙虎榜对比(找辨识度龙头)
## 输出 markdown 结构
```markdown
# {name} ({ticker}) 龙虎榜分析
## 📅 近 30 天上榜 X 次
(列表)
## 🐉 识别到的游资 (Y 位)
| 游资 | 风格 | 在不在射程 | 买入 / 卖出 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 章盟主 | 大资金趋势 | ✅ 在射程 | 买 1.2 亿 |
| 佛山无影脚 | 一日游 | ❌ 不在 | 卖 0.3 亿 (反向预警) |
## ⚖️ 机构 vs 游资
- 机构净买入: ¥X 亿
- 游资净买入: ¥Y 亿
- 主导方: {机构 / 游资}
## 🏆 同板块辨识度龙头
| 排名 | 代码 | 名称 | 上榜次数 | 累计涨幅 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ... | ... | ... | ... |
本股在板块中的位置: 第 N
## 💡 结论一句话
"这是一只机构主导 + 章盟主格局票,板块辨识度排第 2,可以跟。"
```
## 参考资料
详细的 22 位游资席位百科见 `references/seat-encyclopedia.md`。
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...
Ultra-compressed communication mode. Cuts token usage ~75% by speaking like caveman while keeping full technical accuracy. Supports intensity levels: lite, full (default), ultra, wenyan-lite, wenyan-full, wenyan-ultra. Use when user says "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "use caveman", "less tokens", "be brief", or invokes /caveman. Also auto-triggers when token efficiency is requested.
**Complete production-ready guide for Google Gemini embeddings API** This skill provides comprehensive coverage of the `gemini-embedding-001` model for generating text embeddings, including SDK usage, REST API patterns, batch processing, RAG integration with Cloudflare Vectorize, and advanced use cases like semantic search and document clustering. ---
Use when a repo needs CodeGraph plus ast-grep for Codex MCP setup, exploration, impact analysis, structural search, or safe refactor planning.
Interview, source-challenge, verify, save, and ADR-gate fuzzy coding requests into Codex-ready implementation specs. Use when a feature, bugfix, refactor, migration, repo-wide change, or architecture task needs user-verified requirements, source-backed decisions, durable architecture decisions, acceptance criteria, validation commands, rollout notes, saved spec/ADR files, and a Codex execution prompt. Do not use when already fully specified or when the user wants direct implementation now.