Documentation management workflow for MkDocs sites and standalone markdown files — initialize, generate, update docs, and create change summaries. Use when asked to "create docs", "write README", "update documentation", "generate docs site", "write CONTRIBUTING", "manage documentation", or "docs changelog".
Scanned 9/7/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add sequenzia/claude-alchemy --skill docs-manager --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Docs Manager?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/sequenzia-docs-manager-e3d64148)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: docs-manager
description: >-
Documentation management workflow for MkDocs sites and standalone markdown files —
initialize, generate, update docs, and create change summaries. Use when asked to
"create docs", "write README", "update documentation", "generate docs site",
"write CONTRIBUTING", "manage documentation", or "docs changelog".
dependencies:
- deep-analysis (core-tools)
---
# Documentation Manager Workflow
Execute a structured 6-phase workflow for managing documentation. Supports two documentation formats (MkDocs sites and standalone markdown files) and three action types (generate, update, change summary).
## Phase Overview
Execute these phases in order (some phases are conditional):
1. **Interactive Discovery** -- Determine documentation type, format, and scope through user interaction
2. **Project Detection & Setup** -- Detect project context, conditionally scaffold MkDocs
3. **Codebase Analysis** -- Deep codebase exploration using the deep-analysis skill
4. **Documentation Planning** -- Translate analysis findings into a concrete plan for user approval
5. **Documentation Generation** -- Launch docs-writer agents to generate content
6. **Integration & Finalization** -- Write files, validate, present results
---
## Phase 1: Interactive Discovery
**Goal:** Determine through user interaction what documentation to create and in what format.
### Step 1 -- Infer intent from `$ARGUMENTS`
Parse the user's input to pre-fill selections:
- Keywords like "README", "CONTRIBUTING", "ARCHITECTURE" -> infer `basic-markdown`
- Keywords like "mkdocs", "docs site", "documentation site" -> infer `mkdocs`
- Keywords like "changelog", "release notes", "what changed" -> infer `change-summary`
If the intent is clear, present a summary for quick confirmation before proceeding (skip to Step 4). If ambiguous, proceed to Step 2.
### Step 2 -- Q1: Documentation type
If the documentation type is ambiguous or needs confirmation, prompt the user:
> What type of documentation would you like to create?
- "MkDocs documentation site" -- Full docs site with mkdocs.yml, Material theme
- "Basic markdown files" -- Standalone files like README.md, CONTRIBUTING.md, ARCHITECTURE.md
- "Change summary" -- Changelog, release notes, commit message
Store as `DOC_TYPE` = `mkdocs` | `basic-markdown` | `change-summary`.
### Step 3 -- Conditional follow-up questions
**If `DOC_TYPE = mkdocs`:**
Q2: Prompt the user -- Existing project or new setup?
- "Existing MkDocs project" -> `MKDOCS_MODE = existing`
- "New MkDocs setup" -> `MKDOCS_MODE = new`
Q3 (if `existing`): Prompt the user -- What to do?
- "Generate new pages"
- "Update existing pages"
- "Both -- generate and update"
Store as `ACTION`.
Q3 (if `new`): Prompt the user -- Scope?
- "Full documentation"
- "Getting started only (minimal init)"
- "Custom pages"
Store as `MKDOCS_SCOPE`. If custom, ask for desired pages (free text).
**If `DOC_TYPE = basic-markdown`:**
Q2: Prompt the user -- Which files?
- "README.md"
- "CONTRIBUTING.md"
- "ARCHITECTURE.md"
- "API documentation"
Store as `MARKDOWN_FILES`. If "Other" is selected, ask for custom file paths/descriptions.
**If `DOC_TYPE = change-summary`:**
Q2: Prompt the user -- What range?
- "Since last tag"
- "Between two refs"
- "Recent changes"
Follow up for specific range details (tag name, ref pair, etc.).
### Step 4 -- Confirm selections
Present a summary of all selections and prompt the user:
- "Proceed"
- "Change selections"
If the user wants to change, loop back to the relevant question.
Immediately proceed to Phase 2.
---
## Phase 2: Project Detection & Setup
**Goal:** Detect project context automatically, conditionally scaffold MkDocs.
### Step 1 -- Detect project metadata (all paths)
- Check manifests: `package.json`, `pyproject.toml`, `Cargo.toml`, `go.mod`, `pom.xml`
- Run `git remote get-url origin 2>/dev/null`
- Note primary language and framework
### Step 2 -- Check existing documentation (all paths)
- Search for `docs/**/*.md`, `README.md`, `CONTRIBUTING.md`, `ARCHITECTURE.md`
- For MkDocs: check for `mkdocs.yml`/`mkdocs.yaml`, read if found
### Step 3 -- MkDocs Initialization (only if `DOC_TYPE = mkdocs` AND `MKDOCS_MODE = new`)
1. Load the MkDocs configuration template (see MkDocs Config Template section below)
2. Fill template with detected metadata (ask the user if incomplete)
3. Generate `mkdocs.yml`, create `docs/index.md` and `docs/getting-started.md`
4. Present scaffold for confirmation before writing
If `MKDOCS_SCOPE = minimal` (getting started only): write the scaffold files and skip to Phase 6.
### Step 4 -- Set action-specific context (for update/change-summary)
For **update** modes, determine the approach:
- **git-diff** -- Update docs affected by recent code changes (default if user mentions "recent changes" or a branch/tag)
- **full-scan** -- Compare all source code against all docs for gap analysis (default if user says "full update" or "sync all")
- **targeted** -- Update specific pages or sections (default if user specifies file paths or page names)
For **change-summary**, run `git log` and `git diff --stat` for the determined range.
Immediately proceed to Phase 3.
---
## Phase 3: Codebase Analysis
**Goal:** Deep codebase exploration using the deep-analysis skill.
**Skip conditions:**
- Skip for `change-summary` (uses git-based analysis instead -- see below)
- Skip for MkDocs minimal init-only (`MKDOCS_SCOPE = minimal`)
### Step 1 -- Build documentation-focused analysis context
Construct a specific context string based on Phase 1 selections:
| Selection | Analysis Context |
|-----------|-----------------|
| MkDocs generate | "Documentation generation -- find all public APIs, architecture, integration points, and existing documentation..." |
| MkDocs update | "Documentation update -- identify changes to public APIs, outdated references, documentation gaps..." |
| Basic markdown README | "Project overview -- understand purpose, architecture, setup, key features, configuration, and dependencies..." |
| Basic markdown ARCHITECTURE | "Architecture documentation -- map system structure, components, data flow, design decisions, key dependencies..." |
| Basic markdown API docs | "API documentation -- find all public functions, classes, methods, types, their signatures and usage patterns..." |
| Basic markdown CONTRIBUTING | "Contribution guidelines -- find dev workflow, testing setup, code style rules, commit conventions, CI process..." |
| Multiple files | Combine relevant contexts from above |
### Step 2 -- Run deep-analysis
Refer to the **deep-analysis** skill (from the core-tools package) and follow its workflow.
Pass the documentation-focused analysis context from Step 1.
Deep-analysis handles all agent orchestration (reconnaissance, team planning, code-explorers + code-synthesizer). When invoked by another skill, cache hits are auto-accepted to avoid redundant exploration.
### Step 3 -- Supplemental analysis for update with git-diff mode
After deep-analysis, additionally:
1. Run `git diff --name-only [base-ref]` for changed files
2. Search existing docs for references to changed files/functions
3. Cross-reference with synthesis findings
### For change-summary path (instead of deep-analysis)
1. Run `git log --oneline [range]` and `git diff --stat [range]`
2. Launch 1 exploration agent (refer to the **code-explorer** agent from the core-tools package) to analyze the changed files:
- Analysis context: Change summary for [range]
- Focus area: the files changed in the specified range
- Instructions: for each significant change, identify what was added/modified/removed, impact on public APIs and user-facing behavior, whether any changes are breaking
- Return a structured report
Immediately proceed to Phase 4.
---
## Phase 4: Documentation Planning
**Goal:** Translate analysis findings into a concrete documentation plan.
### Step 1 -- Produce plan based on doc type
**MkDocs:**
- Pages to create (with `docs/` paths)
- Pages to update (with specific sections)
- Proposed `mkdocs.yml` nav updates
- Page dependency ordering (independent pages first, then pages that cross-reference them)
**Basic Markdown:**
- Files to create/update (with target paths)
- Proposed structure/outline for each file
- Content scope per file
**Change Summary:**
- Output formats to generate (Format 1: Changelog, Format 2: Commit message, Format 3: MkDocs page -- only if MkDocs site exists)
- Range confirmation
- Scope of changes
### Step 2 -- User approval
Prompt the user:
- "Approve the plan as-is"
- "Modify the plan" (describe changes)
- "Reduce scope" (select specific items only)
Immediately proceed to Phase 5.
---
## Phase 5: Documentation Generation
**Goal:** Generate content using docs-writer agents.
### Step 1 -- Load templates
- If `DOC_TYPE = change-summary`: Load the change summary templates (see Change Summary Templates section below)
- If `DOC_TYPE = basic-markdown`: Load the markdown file templates from `references/markdown-file-templates.md`
### Step 2 -- Group by dependency
- **Independent pages/files** -- Can be written without referencing other new content (API reference, standalone guides, individual markdown files)
- **Dependent pages/files** -- Reference or summarize content from other pages (index pages, overview pages, README that links to CONTRIBUTING)
### Step 3 -- Launch docs-writer agents
Launch docs-writer agents for content generation.
Launch independent pages/files in parallel, then sequential for dependent ones (include generated content from independent pages in the prompt context).
**MkDocs prompt template:**
```
Documentation task: [page type — API reference / architecture / how-to / change summary]
Target file: [docs/path/to/page.md]
Output format: MkDocs
Project: [project name] at [project root]
MkDocs site context:
- Theme: Material for MkDocs
- Extensions available: admonitions, code highlighting, tabbed content, Mermaid diagrams
- Diagram guidance: Follow technical-diagrams conventions — use Mermaid for all diagrams with dark text on nodes.
- Existing pages: [list of current doc pages]
Exploration findings:
[Relevant findings from Phase 3 for this page]
Existing page content (if updating):
[Current content of the page, or "New page — no existing content"]
Generate the complete page content in MkDocs-flavored Markdown.
```
**Basic Markdown prompt template:**
```
Documentation task: [file type — README / CONTRIBUTING / ARCHITECTURE / API docs]
Target file: [path/to/file.md]
Output format: Basic Markdown
Project: [project name] at [project root]
File type guidance:
[Relevant structural template from markdown-file-templates.md]
Exploration findings:
[Relevant findings from Phase 3 for this file]
Existing file content (if updating):
[Current content, or "New file — no existing content"]
Generate the complete file content in standard GitHub-flavored Markdown.
Do NOT use MkDocs-specific extensions (admonitions, tabbed content, code block titles).
Diagram guidance: Follow technical-diagrams conventions — use Mermaid for all diagrams with dark text on nodes. GitHub renders Mermaid natively.
```
### Step 4 -- Review generated content
- Verify structure, check for unfilled placeholders
- Validate cross-references between pages/files use correct relative paths
Immediately proceed to Phase 6.
---
## Phase 6: Integration & Finalization
**Goal:** Write files, validate, present results.
### Step 1 -- Write files
**MkDocs:**
- Write pages under `docs/`
- Update `mkdocs.yml` nav -- read current config, add new pages in logical positions, preserve existing structure
**Basic Markdown:**
- Write files to their target paths (project root or specified directories)
- For updates, use incremental editing to modify existing files
**Change Summary:**
- Present outputs inline for review
- Write files as applicable (e.g., append to CHANGELOG.md)
### Step 2 -- Validate
**MkDocs:**
- Verify all files referenced in `nav` exist on disk
- Check for broken cross-references between pages
- If `mkdocs` CLI is available, run `mkdocs build --strict 2>&1` to check for warnings (non-blocking)
**Basic Markdown:**
- Validate internal cross-references between files (e.g., README links to CONTRIBUTING)
- Check that referenced paths exist
### Step 3 -- Present results
Summarize what was done:
- Files created (with paths)
- Files updated (with description of changes)
- Navigation changes (if MkDocs)
- Any validation warnings
For **change-summary**, present generated outputs directly inline.
### Step 4 -- Next steps
Prompt the user with relevant options:
**MkDocs:**
- "Preview the site" (if `mkdocs serve` is available)
- "Commit the changes"
- "Generate additional pages"
- "Done -- no further action"
**Basic Markdown:**
- "Commit the changes"
- "Generate additional files"
- "Review a specific file"
- "Done -- no further action"
---
## Error Handling
If any phase fails:
1. Explain what went wrong
2. Ask the user how to proceed:
- Retry the phase
- Skip to next phase (with partial results)
- Abort the workflow
### Non-Git Projects
If the project is not a git repository:
- Skip git remote detection in Phase 2 (omit `repo_url` and `repo_name` from mkdocs.yml)
- The `update` action with git-diff mode is unavailable -- fall back to full-scan or targeted mode
- The `change-summary` action is unavailable -- inform the user and suggest alternatives
### Basic Markdown on Non-Git Projects
- CONTRIBUTING.md is still viable -- use project conventions instead of git workflow sections
- Skip branch naming and PR process sections; focus on code style, testing, and setup
### Phase Failure
- Explain the error clearly
- Offer retry/skip/abort options
---
## Agent Coordination
- **Phase 3**: Exploration and synthesis handled by the deep-analysis skill, which manages parallel exploration agents and a synthesis agent.
- **Phase 5**: docs-writer agents launched for high-quality content generation. Parallel for independent files, sequential for dependent files.
---
## Change Summary Templates
### Format 1: Markdown Changelog
Follows [Keep a Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/) conventions:
```markdown
## [Unreleased]
### Added
- Add [feature] with [key capability]
### Changed
- Update [component] to [new behavior]
### Fixed
- Fix [bug] that caused [symptom]
### Removed
- Remove [deprecated feature] in favor of [replacement]
```
Guidelines: Use imperative mood. One entry per distinct change. Group related changes. Focus on user-facing impact.
### Format 2: Git Commit Message
Follows [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/) style:
```
type(scope): summary of changes
Detailed description of what changed and why.
Changes:
- List specific modifications
- Include file paths for significant changes
BREAKING CHANGE: Description of breaking change (if applicable)
```
Types: `feat`, `fix`, `docs`, `refactor`, `perf`, `test`, `chore`
### Format 3: MkDocs Documentation Page
> This format applies only when the documentation target is an MkDocs site.
A full documentation page with highlights, features, improvements, bug fixes, breaking changes with migration guidance, affected files table, and contributors.
### Choosing Formats
| Format | Best For |
|--------|----------|
| **Markdown Changelog** | Appending to an existing CHANGELOG.md |
| **Git Commit Message** | Describing changes in a commit or PR |
| **MkDocs Page** | Publishing release notes in the documentation site |
## MkDocs Config Template
```yaml
site_name: PROJECT_NAME
site_description: PROJECT_DESCRIPTION
site_url: ""
repo_url: REPO_URL
repo_name: REPO_NAME
theme:
name: material
features:
- navigation.tabs
- navigation.sections
- navigation.expand
- navigation.top
- search.suggest
- search.highlight
- content.code.copy
- content.tabs.link
palette:
- scheme: default
primary: indigo
accent: indigo
toggle:
icon: material/brightness-7
name: Switch to dark mode
- scheme: slate
primary: indigo
accent: indigo
toggle:
icon: material/brightness-4
name: Switch to light mode
markdown_extensions:
- admonition
- pymdownx.details
- pymdownx.superfences:
custom_fences:
- name: mermaid
class: mermaid
format: !!python/name:pymdownx.superfences.fence_code_format
- pymdownx.highlight:
anchor_linenums: true
line_spans: __span
pygments_lang_guess: false
- pymdownx.inlinehilite
- pymdownx.tabbed:
alternate_style: true
- pymdownx.snippets
- attr_list
- md_in_html
- toc:
permalink: true
nav:
- Home: index.md
- Getting Started: getting-started.md
```
Populate `PROJECT_NAME`, `PROJECT_DESCRIPTION`, `REPO_URL`, `REPO_NAME` from detected metadata. Omit `repo_url` and `repo_name` if not in a git repository.
---
## Integration Notes
**What this component does:** Orchestrates a complete documentation management workflow supporting MkDocs sites, standalone markdown files, and change summaries -- from interactive discovery through codebase analysis, planning, generation, and validation.
**Capabilities needed:** Shell execution (git commands, mkdocs CLI), file reading/writing/editing, pattern search, sub-agent spawning (deep-analysis from core-tools, code-explorer from core-tools, docs-writer), user interaction.
**Adaptation guidance:** This skill relies on deep-analysis (core-tools) for codebase exploration in Phase 3 and spawns docs-writer agents for content generation in Phase 5. The MkDocs config template and change summary templates are inlined. The markdown-file-templates reference file provides structural templates for standalone files.
**Sub-agent capabilities:** Docs-writer agents need file reading, search, and shell execution for producing complete documentation pages. They draw on knowledge from the technical-diagrams skill (core-tools) for Mermaid diagram conventions.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!