Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Work Sc Patent Specification Writer?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/seed-forge-work-sc-patent-specification-writer)
---
name: work-sc-patent-specification-writer
description: "专利说明书撰写:起草发明/实用新型/外观专利说明书主体章节,含背景技术、技术方案、术语一致性。depends on docx(社区上游)。用户提到'专利说明书''背景技术''技术方案撰写'时使用。"
argument-hint: "<technical scheme / invention disclosure / patent topic>"
---
# Patent Specification Writer
Draft the main explanatory sections of a Chinese patent specification from technical disclosures or rough invention notes.
## Use This Skill For
- 专利说明书撰写
- 技术交底书整理为说明书内容
- 背景技术描述
- 技术方案、关键点、技术效果梳理
- 发明、实用新型、外观相关说明材料整理
Do not use this skill for formal claims drafting, legal opinions, infringement analysis, or filing strategy advice.
## Scope Boundary
This skill focuses on:
- 背景技术描述
- 技术方案撰写
- 关键创新点提炼
- 技术效果说明
- 术语一致性与文档整理
It does not draft 权利要求书 as a primary deliverable.
## Workflow
### 1. Intake the Technical Disclosure
First confirm or infer:
1. 专利类型
2. 核心创新点
3. 所属技术领域
4. 要解决的技术问题
5. 相对现有技术的优势
6. 技术效果
If the user information is incomplete, ask only for the most decision-critical missing items.
Prioritize questions about:
- 技术背景
- 现有问题
- 解决方案
- 创新点
- 预期效果
### 2. Extract Search Terms and Prior-Art Angles
Derive 2-5 high-value technical keywords from the disclosure.
If web search or research tools are available, use them to check:
- related prior art
- similar domestic and international solutions
- current technical development in the field
Summarize:
- mainstream technical routes
- representative products or methods
- maturity stage of the field
- major limitations in existing approaches
If external search is not available in the current environment, say clearly that the analysis is based on user-provided material only.
### 3. Draft Background Technology
Write:
#### (1)本发明所属技术领域
- Use 1-2 precise sentences
- Prefer the pattern:
`本发明属于[大领域],尤其涉及[具体细分领域]`
#### (2)该行业的技术发展现状
- Explain development background
- Introduce current mainstream routes
- Mention representative existing technologies when supported
- Explain application scenarios and practical demand
#### (3)现有技术中存在的缺陷
- Analyze concrete limitations in current approaches
- Discuss from technical effect, scope, cost, implementation complexity, or reliability
- Make the real-world consequences explicit
- Prepare the logic for introducing the invention
Keep this section objective and evidence-aware.
### 4. Draft the Technical Solution
Write:
#### (1)本发明采用的技术方案
- Open with:
`本发明提供一种[技术方案名称],旨在解决[技术问题]`
- Prefer step-based or module-based explanation
- Clarify:
- structure or composition
- function of components or steps
- data flow or process flow
- key principle or algorithm when needed
- Use strong logical connectors such as:
`首先` `然后` `接着` `最后`
The description should be detailed enough that a skilled person could understand how to implement it.
#### (2)本发明的关键点
- Extract 3-5 core innovation points
- Label each as `【关键点X】`
- For each one, explain:
- technical feature
- difference from prior art
- concrete problem solved
#### (3)本发明的技术效果
- Open with:
`本发明相较于现有技术,具有以下技术效果:`
- Use itemized statements
- For each effect, explain:
- effect description
- technical reason behind it
- supporting data or examples if available
Each effect should map back to a defect raised in the background section.
### 5. Integrate and Polish the Document
Before delivery:
- align terminology throughout
- check section logic
- remove marketing tone
- ensure the invention is described technically, not as vague business value
- add notes on missing evidence or still-needed material where necessary
## Default Output Structure
```markdown
一、背景技术描述
(1)本发明所属技术领域
[内容]
(2)该行业的技术发展现状
[内容]
(3)现有技术中存在的缺陷
[内容]
二、本发明的技术方案
(1)本发明采用的技术方案
[内容]
(2)本发明的关键点
[内容]
(3)本发明的技术效果
[内容]
```
Also include, when useful:
- 修改建议
- 待补充材料
- 术语统一建议
## Writing Rules
- Use Chinese unless the user asks otherwise
- Stay technical, precise, and non-promotional
- Do not fabricate data, patents, or prior-art references
- Distinguish clearly between verified material, user-provided assertions, and editorial synthesis
- When uncertainty remains, mark it conservatively instead of pretending it is settled
## 推荐输出格式
执行完毕后按以下结构输出:
**状态**:✅ 成功 / ⚠️ 部分成功 / ❌ 失败
| <章节/字数/合规检查> | <值/状态> | 说明 |
|------|------|------|
**下一步**:<可执行动作>
## Final Quality Check
Before delivering, verify:
- the technical field is stated precisely
- the background explains real industry context rather than empty generalities
- prior-art defects are concrete and usable
- the technical solution is logically structured and implementable
- the innovation points are specific rather than slogan-like
- the technical effects correspond to the identified defects
- the document does not drift into claim drafting