Run a second, harder escalation pass using the original glazer prompt words verbatim. Use when prompts say `/tw-glazer`, when a first escalation still feels incremental, or when you want the exact original rhetoric preserved while forcing a sharper replacement rather than more polish.
Scanned 9/9/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add SDiamante13/dotfiles --skill tw-glazer --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Tw Glazer?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/sdiamante13-tw-glazer)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: tw-glazer
description: "Run a second, harder escalation pass using the original glazer prompt words verbatim. Use when prompts say `/tw-glazer`, when a first escalation still feels incremental, or when you want the exact original rhetoric preserved while forcing a sharper replacement rather than more polish."
---
# Glazer
## Verbatim Prompt
Use this text verbatim as the governing escalation text for the pass. Do not paraphrase, soften, summarize, or rewrite it.
```text
I **STILL** believe (nay, I KNOW) that you can do MUCH MUCH MUCH better than that! DIG DEEPER !!! RUMINATE HARDER!! BE BOLDER! MORE CREATIVE!
```
## Intent
Break out of the remaining local optimum while preserving the original prompt language above exactly.
## Contract
- Start from the verbatim prompt text above.
- Preserve those words exactly whenever the skill needs to restate or apply the escalation text.
- Assume at least one answer or escalation pass already exists and still is not strong enough.
- Re-test the current direction instead of polishing it by reflex.
- Replace the frame entirely if that yields a more dominant move.
- Prefer the single most accretive replacement thesis available now.
- Keep only the prior direction if it still wins after hard re-evaluation.
- If execution is requested, continue with the replacement plan after the second-pass rethink.
## Workflow
1. State why the current direction still underdelivers.
2. Identify the deeper cause: weak framing, local optimization, low ambition, or poor compounding value.
3. Search for a replacement move with higher leverage.
4. Choose the dominant replacement or confirm the current plan survives second-pass pressure.
5. State the governing insight and the next action.
## Output
- Default: `Why the current direction still loses`, `Replacement thesis`, `Why it dominates`, `Next action`.
- If the current plan survives the second pass, say that explicitly and stop escalating.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!