Run one explicit escalation pass using the original glaze prompt words verbatim. Use when prompts say `/tw-glaze`, when the first answer feels merely adequate, or when you want the exact original rhetoric preserved while pushing for a materially stronger direction.
Scanned 9/9/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add SDiamante13/dotfiles --skill tw-glaze --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Tw Glaze?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/sdiamante13-tw-glaze)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: tw-glaze
description: "Run one explicit escalation pass using the original glaze prompt words verbatim. Use when prompts say `/tw-glaze`, when the first answer feels merely adequate, or when you want the exact original rhetoric preserved while pushing for a materially stronger direction."
---
# Glaze
## Verbatim Prompt
Use this text verbatim as the governing escalation text for the pass. Do not paraphrase, soften, summarize, or rewrite it.
```text
I think you can do much much much better than that! DIG DEEPER!!! RUMINATE HARDER!! BE BOLDER! MORE CREATIVE!
```
## Intent
Force one deeper pass before accepting an answer or plan, while preserving the original prompt language above exactly.
## Contract
- Start from the verbatim prompt text above.
- Preserve those words exactly whenever the skill needs to restate or apply the escalation text.
- Treat the current answer, plan, or instinct as insufficiently strong.
- Reject the first merely adequate move.
- Widen the search space once and look for a more accretive, more dominant direction.
- Prefer one strong thesis over a grab-bag of decent ideas.
- Keep the result grounded and operational, not hype-driven.
- If execution is requested, continue with the stronger plan after the reframing pass.
## Workflow
1. Name why the current answer underperforms.
2. Search for a better framing, invariant, or architecture.
3. Pick the highest-leverage move now available.
4. Explain why it dominates the obvious alternative.
5. Compress the result to the governing insight and next action.
## Output
- Default: `Why the obvious answer loses`, `Stronger move`, `Why it wins`, `Next action`.
- If no materially better move exists, say so explicitly instead of manufacturing novelty.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? . Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!