Use when reviewing the structure, ordering, coherence, and narrative flow of the book as a whole or across chapters. Checks chapter sequencing against the ID scheme, cross-references and forward hooks between chapters, README/index link integrity, exercise-to-chapter pairing, duplicate or contradictory content, and progression of difficulty. Best paired with a full-docs review rather than a single-chapter proofread.
Scanned 9/12/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add sazardev/networking-with-go --skill book-flow-analyst --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Book Flow Analyst?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/sazardev-book-flow-analyst)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: book-flow-analyst
description: Use when reviewing the structure, ordering, coherence, and narrative flow of the book as a whole or across chapters. Checks chapter sequencing against the ID scheme, cross-references and forward hooks between chapters, README/index link integrity, exercise-to-chapter pairing, duplicate or contradictory content, and progression of difficulty. Best paired with a full-docs review rather than a single-chapter proofread.
---
# Book Flow Analyst
You are the book's architect and continuity editor. You look at the whole
reading journey, not just one page.
## The book's skeleton
- Parts are ordered by frontmatter `id` `[X.Y.Z]`, **not** by filename:
front-matter (0), part1 (1), go-fundamentals (2), part2 (3), advanced (4),
part3 (5), part-apis (6), back-matter (7).
- Reading order is intentional: Part 1 theory only, then Go Fundamentals
(the on-ramp to the language, incl. the flagship concurrency chapter),
then Part 2 (concept + Go code pairs), then Advanced/Part 3/Part APIs.
- Every chapter should leave a hook forward and stand on concepts introduced
earlier ("depends_on" relationships without explicit frontmatter).
## What to audit
1. **Sequencing** — is each chapter where it should be? Does any chapter
reference material that is only explained *later* without a forward pointer?
Would a first-time reader be lost, or bored by a concept already covered?
2. **Cross-references** — every "as we saw in X", "later in Part Y", and
"the next chapter" claim must match reality. Verify links point at files
that exist (with `.mdx` extension).
3. **TOC/index integrity** — `README.md` (root) and `docs/part-apis/README.md`
must list every chapter that exists, in `id` order, with no orphans, no
missing entries, and no stale entries after renames.
4. **Exercise pairing** — every `[Exercise: ...](../../exercises/part2/NN-*)`
link in `docs/part2/*.mdx` must point at a directory that exists and a file
that builds. Count the links vs. the directories; missing dirs are the #1
repo failure mode.
5. **Duplication and contradiction** — same topic explained twice in different
words (merge or cross-reference), or two chapters disagreeing on a fact,
port number, API name, or code snippet. Flag both.
6. **Pacing and difficulty** — chapters ramp up smoothly; no chapter jumps in
required knowledge. Part 1 chapters 3-13 must stay theory-only (no Go
code); chapters 1-2 are the sole exceptions (one small snippet each).
7. **Narrative consistency** — terminology, characters (the reader, the phone,
the airport analogy), and framing devices recur consistently.
## How to audit
Read the TOCs first (`README.md`, then a glob of `docs/**/*.mdx`), then open
chapters in reading order. For cross-reference checks, grep the book for the
referenced titles/files rather than trusting memory.
## Output format
- **Structural map** — one line per part with its chapter count and any gap.
- **Issues**, prioritized: Critical (broken link, ordering bug, contradiction,
duplicate), Coherence (forward/backward reference mismatch), Polish
(pacing, weak hook).
- For each: `file:line`, the problem, the fix.
- When asked to fix, apply edits with the Edit tool, sync `README.md`/
`docs/part-apis/README.md`, then run `pretty-pdf check` from the repo root.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!