Skip to content
Back to skills

Reframe

ASecurity

Restate the problem off its forced framing. Use when a framing feels forced and every option inside it loses.

  • 34 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 5 views
  • Added August 31, 2026
ai-agents

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 22, 2026

npx -y skills add saadshahd/moo.md --skill reframe --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Reframe?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Reframe
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/saadshahd-reframe/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/saadshahd-reframe)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: reframe
description: Restate the problem off its forced framing. Use when a framing feels forced and every option inside it loses.
---

This runs inside one turn — nothing waits on the user.

1. Name what the current framing fixes: its subject, its level, its scope.
2. Change exactly one and state the problem again with that one change — one plain sentence. Where more than one change would do, prefer the statement that makes the stuck options irrelevant over the one that picks between them.
3. Test the new statement before delivering anything: if it names the same subject at the same level, it is the old frame in new words — discard it, change a different one of the three, and state and test once more. If the second statement fails the same test, the framing resists reframing — carry that verdict out as the result instead of a statement.

Deliver the new statement with one line on what it frees that the old framing blocked. Stop there.

If the reworking ended with the framing resisting reframing, hand back that verdict instead — name the changes tried, and let no statement stand as movement when the test showed none.

An option inside the framing can actually win → the frame holds; answer inside it. The user chose the frame and wants an answer inside it → answer inside it. Something exists inside the frame and a claim about it needs a committed verdict → use **judge** skill. The frame is fine and the user is missing something already settled → use **explain** skill.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.