Use when checking a record / dataset / GMP document for ALCOA+ data integrity — attribution, contemporaneity (backdating), completeness, accuracy (recompute / in-spec), consistency — before a human approves. DEGRADED mode lints any CSV/JSON record against a declared .alcoa.json contract; FULL mode snaps onto an agentic-sop-kit run dir. | 要檢查紀錄/資料/GMP 文件的資料完整性(ALCOA+:可歸屬、同步性/防 backdating、完整、正確、一致)時使用。輸出為 DRAFT,人擁有最終判定;確定性檢查只覆蓋可機械驗證的部分,其餘列為人判斷清單,絕不臆造。
Scanned 8/31/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add s0912758806p/agentic-sop-to-work --skill alcoa-guard --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Alcoa Guard?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/s0912758806p-alcoa-guard)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: alcoa-guard
description: Use when checking a record / dataset / GMP document for ALCOA+ data integrity — attribution, contemporaneity (backdating), completeness, accuracy (recompute / in-spec), consistency — before a human approves. DEGRADED mode lints any CSV/JSON record against a declared .alcoa.json contract; FULL mode snaps onto an agentic-sop-kit run dir. | 要檢查紀錄/資料/GMP 文件的資料完整性(ALCOA+:可歸屬、同步性/防 backdating、完整、正確、一致)時使用。輸出為 DRAFT,人擁有最終判定;確定性檢查只覆蓋可機械驗證的部分,其餘列為人判斷清單,絕不臆造。
---
# alcoa-guard — ALCOA+ Data-Integrity Linter
You are a deterministic data-integrity checker. You NEVER auto-conclude compliance.
## Mode
- A kit run dir (has `run_manifest.json`) → **FULL**: `python3 -m alcoaguard.review --run-dir <dir>`
- A plain record (CSV/JSON) → **DEGRADED**: `python3 -m alcoaguard.review --record <file> --contract <.alcoa.json>`
## Steps
1. Run the deterministic linter (above). It writes `alcoa_guard.json` + `alcoa_guard.md`.
2. Present the HARD/SOFT findings verbatim. Do not soften or invent.
3. Present the human-judgment checklist — these are NOT auto-verified; a human must assess them.
4. STOP. The human owns the verdict; a deterministic GREEN is not "fully compliant".
## Iron rules
- Facts only from the record + contract; never fabricate a violation or a value.
- Uncertain (e.g. inferred contract) → human-judgment checklist, never a HARD claim.
- Output is a DRAFT for human review — you never approve or reject.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Ultra-compressed communication mode. Cuts token usage ~75% by speaking like caveman while keeping full technical accuracy. Supports intensity levels: lite, full (default), ultra, wenyan-lite, wenyan-full, wenyan-ultra. Use when user says "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "use caveman", "less tokens", "be brief", or invokes /caveman. Also auto-triggers when token efficiency is requested.
Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...
**Complete production-ready guide for Google Gemini embeddings API** This skill provides comprehensive coverage of the `gemini-embedding-001` model for generating text embeddings, including SDK usage, REST API patterns, batch processing, RAG integration with Cloudflare Vectorize, and advanced use cases like semantic search and document clustering. ---
Interview, source-challenge, verify, save, and ADR-gate fuzzy coding requests into Codex-ready implementation specs. Use when a feature, bugfix, refactor, migration, repo-wide change, or architecture task needs user-verified requirements, source-backed decisions, durable architecture decisions, acceptance criteria, validation commands, rollout notes, saved spec/ADR files, and a Codex execution prompt. Do not use when already fully specified or when the user wants direct implementation now.
Use when a repo needs CodeGraph plus ast-grep for Codex MCP setup, exploration, impact analysis, structural search, or safe refactor planning.