Skip to content
Back to skills

Constraint Check

ASecurity

Meta-validator for HARD-GATEs. Use when auditing whether a skill's mandatory constraints were actually followed during a workflow (not just claimed). Called by cook, team, and audit for discipline compliance.

  • 86 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 4 views
  • Added September 11, 2026
toolsrustgobashgit

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 11, 2026

npx -y skills add Rune-kit/rune --skill constraint-check --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Constraint Check?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Constraint Check
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/rune-kit-constraint-check/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/rune-kit-constraint-check)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: constraint-check
description: "Meta-validator for HARD-GATEs. Use when auditing whether a skill's mandatory constraints were actually followed during a workflow (not just claimed). Called by cook, team, and audit for discipline compliance."
user-invocable: false
metadata:
  author: runedev
  version: "1.1.0"
  layer: L3
  model: sonnet
  group: validation
  tools: "Read, Glob, Grep"
---

# constraint-check

## Purpose

The internal affairs department for Rune skills. Checks whether HARD-GATEs and mandatory constraints were actually followed during a workflow — not just claimed to be followed. Reads the constraint definitions from skill files and audits the conversation trail for compliance.

While `completion-gate` checks if claims have evidence, `constraint-check` checks if the PROCESS was followed. Did you actually write tests before code? Did you actually get plan approval? Did you actually run sentinel?

## Triggers

- Called by `cook` (L1) at end of workflow as discipline audit
- Called by `team` (L1) to verify stream agents followed constraints
- Called by `audit` (L2) during quality dimension assessment
- `/rune constraint-check` — manual audit of current session

## Calls (outbound)

None — pure read-only validator.

## Called By (inbound)

- `cook` (L1): end-of-workflow discipline audit
- `team` (L1): verify stream agent compliance
- `audit` (L2): quality dimension
- User: manual session audit

## Execution

### Step 1 — Identify Active Skills

Parse the conversation/workflow to identify which skills were invoked:

```
Extract from context:
  - Skills invoked via Skill tool (exact list)
  - Skills referenced in agent narrative
  - Phase progression (cook phases completed)
```

### Step 2 — Load Constraint Definitions

For each invoked skill, extract HARD-GATEs and numbered constraints:

```
For each skill in invoked_skills:
  Read: skills/<skill>/SKILL.md
  Extract:
    - <HARD-GATE> blocks → mandatory, violation = BLOCK
    - ## Constraints numbered list → required, violation = WARN
    - ## Mesh Gates table → required gates
```

### Step 3 — Audit Compliance

Check each constraint against the conversation evidence:

| Constraint Type | How to Verify | Evidence Source |
|---|---|---|
| "MUST write tests BEFORE code" | Test file Write/Edit timestamps before implementation Write/Edit | Tool call ordering |
| "MUST get user approval" | User message containing "go"/"yes"/"proceed" after plan | Conversation history |
| "MUST run verification" | Bash command with test/lint/build output | Tool call results |
| "MUST show actual output" | Stdout captured in agent response | Agent messages |
| "MUST NOT modify files outside scope" | Git diff files vs plan file list | Git + plan comparison |
| "Iron Law: delete code before test" | No implementation code exists before test creation | Tool call ordering |

### Step 4 — Classify Violations

| Violation Type | Severity | Meaning |
|---------------|----------|---------|
| HARD-GATE violation | BLOCK | Skill says this is non-negotiable |
| Constraint violation | WARN | Skill says this is required but not fatal |
| Best practice skip | INFO | Recommended but optional |

### Step 5 — Report

```
## Constraint Check Report
- **Status**: COMPLIANT | VIOLATIONS_FOUND | CRITICAL_VIOLATION
- **Skills Audited**: [count]
- **Constraints Checked**: [count]
- **Violations**: [count by severity]

### HARD-GATE Violations (BLOCK)
- [skill:test] Iron Law: implementation code written at tool_call #12 BEFORE test file created at #15
- [skill:cook] Plan Gate: Phase 4 started without user approval message

### Constraint Violations (WARN)
- [skill:verification] Constraint 2: "All tests pass" claimed at message #20 without stdout evidence
- [skill:sentinel] Constraint 3: files scanned list not included in report

### Compliance Summary
| Skill | HARD-GATEs | Constraints | Status |
|-------|-----------|-------------|--------|
| cook | 3/3 ✓ | 6/7 (1 WARN) | WARN |
| test | 0/1 ✗ | 8/9 (1 WARN) | BLOCK |
| verification | 1/1 ✓ | 4/6 (2 WARN) | WARN |
| sentinel | 1/1 ✓ | 7/7 ✓ | PASS |

### Remediation
- BLOCK: test Iron Law — delete implementation, restart with test-first
- WARN: verification — re-run and capture stdout
```

## Constraint Catalog (Quick Reference)

Key HARD-GATEs across skills that constraint-check audits:

| Skill | HARD-GATE | Check Method |
|---|---|---|
| test | Tests BEFORE code (Iron Law) | Tool call ordering |
| cook | Scout before plan, plan before code | Phase progression |
| plan | Every code phase has test entry | Plan content |
| verification | Evidence for every claim | Stdout capture |
| sentinel | BLOCK = halt pipeline | No commit after BLOCK |
| preflight | BLOCK = halt pipeline | No commit after BLOCK |
| debug | No code changes during debug | No Write/Edit in debug |
| debug | 3-fix escalation | Fix attempt counter |
| brainstorm | No implementation before approval | User message check |

## Output Format

Constraint Check Report with status (COMPLIANT/VIOLATIONS_FOUND/CRITICAL_VIOLATION), HARD-GATE violations, constraint violations, compliance summary table, and remediation steps. See Step 5 Report above for full template.

## Constraints

1. MUST check all HARD-GATEs for every invoked skill — not just the ones that seem relevant
2. MUST use tool call ordering (not agent narrative) to verify temporal constraints
3. MUST distinguish HARD-GATE violations (BLOCK) from constraint violations (WARN)
4. MUST report specific evidence for each violation — not just "violated"
5. MUST NOT accept agent's self-report as compliance evidence — check independently

## Sharp Edges

| Failure Mode | Severity | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|
| Agent self-reports compliance and constraint-check trusts it | CRITICAL | Constraint 5: check tool calls independently, not agent narrative |
| Only checking cook constraints, missing test/sentinel/etc | HIGH | Constraint 1: audit ALL invoked skills, not just the orchestrator |
| Temporal check wrong (tool calls reordered in context) | MEDIUM | Use tool call sequence numbers, not message ordering |
| Too strict on optional steps (INFO treated as BLOCK) | LOW | Step 4 classification: only HARD-GATE = BLOCK, constraints = WARN |

## Done When

- All invoked skills identified from context
- HARD-GATEs and constraints extracted from each skill's SKILL.md
- Each constraint checked against conversation evidence
- Violations classified as BLOCK/WARN/INFO
- Compliance summary table emitted per skill
- Remediation steps listed for each violation

## Cost Profile

~1000-2000 tokens input, ~500-1000 tokens output. Haiku for speed — reads skill files and checks tool call ordering.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.