Use when defining or debugging Spring Boot 4 database transaction boundaries, rollback, propagation, optimistic-lock retries, or commit-bound events. For duplicate HTTP commands use idempotency-patterns; for reactive transactions use webflux-reactive-patterns.
Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Transactional Patterns?
Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/rrezartprebreza-transactional-patterns-spring-boot-skills)
---
name: transactional-patterns
description: >
Use when defining or debugging Spring Boot 4 database transaction boundaries, rollback,
propagation, optimistic-lock retries, or commit-bound events. For duplicate HTTP
commands use idempotency-patterns; for reactive transactions use webflux-reactive-patterns.
---
# Transactional Patterns
## Establish the boundary
- Inspect the project's Boot/Framework version, transaction manager, persistence technology,
rollback configuration and caller before changing propagation.
- Place multi-step business transactions at the application/service boundary. Preserve
Spring Data repository transactions; repository annotations are not inherently wrong.
- Default propagation is `REQUIRED` — joins existing transaction or creates one
- Use `readOnly = true` for appropriate read units of work. It is an optimization hint,
not write prevention, authorization or automatic routing to a read replica.
- Keep existing architecture and transaction-manager choices. A local database transaction
does not make writes to another database or an HTTP provider atomic.
The snippets below are illustrative; domain classes and imports come from the application.
Adapt the [service template](templates/TransactionalOrderService.java) and compare the
[good](examples/good-transactional-service.java) and [bad](examples/bad-transactional-service.java)
examples when editing a service.
```java
@Service
@RequiredArgsConstructor
@Transactional(readOnly = true) // default for all methods in this service
public class OrderService {
@Transactional // overrides readOnly for writes
public Order createOrder(CreateOrderRequest request) {
inventoryService.reserve(request.items()); // participates in same TX
return orderRepository.save(Order.from(request));
}
public Optional<Order> findById(UUID id) {
return orderRepository.findById(id); // readOnly = true inherited
}
}
```
## Propagation
| Propagation | Behavior |
|-------------|----------|
| `REQUIRED` (default) | Join existing TX or create new |
| `REQUIRES_NEW` | Always create new TX, suspend existing |
| `SUPPORTS` | Join if exists, proceed without TX if not |
| `NOT_SUPPORTED` | Always run without TX |
| `MANDATORY` | Must have existing TX, throw if not |
| `NEVER` | Must NOT have TX, throw if one exists |
Participating `REQUIRED` calls use the outer transaction's isolation, timeout and read-only
settings. Catching an inner failure does not clear its rollback-only marker; outer commit
may still throw `UnexpectedRollbackException`.
`REQUIRES_NEW` needs another connection while the outer transaction retains its resources.
Account for pool capacity and lock contention. Reserve independent commits for records
that must survive a failed operation (for example, an attempted action), not a success
audit row that claims a rolled-back order was created. Do not reference an uncommitted
parent row from an independent audit transaction.
```java
// REQUIRES_NEW — for audit logging that must survive rollback
@Transactional(propagation = Propagation.REQUIRES_NEW)
public void logAuditEvent(AuditEvent event) {
auditRepository.save(event); // commits independently of parent TX
}
// Illustrative: record an attempt for an existing order; failures are unchecked.
@Transactional
public void processOrder(Order order) {
auditService.logAuditEvent(new AuditEvent("ORDER_START", order.getId()));
try {
// ... process, may throw
} catch (RuntimeException e) {
auditService.logAuditEvent(new AuditEvent("ORDER_FAILED", order.getId()));
throw e; // parent TX rolls back, audit TX already committed
}
}
```
## Self-Invocation Pitfall
```java
// ❌ BROKEN — self-invocation bypasses Spring proxy, @Transactional ignored
@Service
public class OrderService {
@Transactional
public void processAll(List<UUID> ids) {
ids.forEach(id -> this.processSingle(id)); // bypasses proxy!
}
@Transactional(propagation = Propagation.REQUIRES_NEW)
public void processSingle(UUID id) { ... } // never creates new TX
}
// ✅ FIX — extract the independently transactional operation to another bean
@Service
@RequiredArgsConstructor
public class OrderService {
private final OrderProcessor orderProcessor; // separate bean
@Transactional
public void processAll(List<UUID> ids) {
ids.forEach(id -> orderProcessor.processSingle(id)); // goes through proxy
}
}
```
## Handling Exceptions
```java
// Default: RuntimeException and Error roll back; checked exceptions do not.
// Check project-wide rollback configuration before adding per-method rules.
@Transactional(rollbackFor = InsufficientInventoryException.class) // checked exception
public Order createOrder(CreateOrderRequest request) throws InsufficientInventoryException {
...
}
```
Never use `noRollbackFor` to recover from `OptimisticLockException`: the persistence
provider marks the transaction rollback-only. Roll it back and retry the whole unit of
work in a fresh transaction, with a bounded policy and a fresh entity read.
## Optimistic Locking
```java
@Entity
public class Order {
@Version
private Long version; // Hibernate handles conflicts automatically
}
// Handles concurrent updates
@Transactional
public Order updateStatus(UUID id, OrderStatus newStatus) {
Order order = orderRepository.findById(id).orElseThrow();
order.updateStatus(newStatus); // conflict can surface at flush or commit
return orderRepository.save(order);
}
```
## Retrying Transient Failures
Retry support ships in core Spring Framework (`org.springframework.resilience.annotation`) — no
Spring Retry dependency. Enable once with `@EnableResilientMethods`, then retry transient failures
such as optimistic-lock conflicts:
```java
@Configuration
@EnableResilientMethods
public class ResilienceConfig {}
@Service
@RequiredArgsConstructor
public class OrderStatusFacade {
private final OrderService orderService; // separate bean — retry must wrap the TX
@Retryable(includes = ObjectOptimisticLockingFailureException.class,
maxRetries = 3, delay = 50, jitter = 25)
public Order updateStatus(UUID id, OrderStatus newStatus) {
return orderService.updateStatus(id, newStatus); // fresh @Transactional per attempt
}
}
```
Put `@Retryable` on a method that *calls* the `@Transactional` method on another bean — each attempt
needs a fresh transaction. Retrying inside the failed transaction re-runs code in a TX already marked
rollback-only. For hot write paths, `@ConcurrencyLimit(10)` (same package) caps concurrent invocations
instead of letting contention turn into retry storms.
Use the [version-specific retry guidance](../resilience-retry/SKILL.md) for dependencies
and annotation imports. A retrying facade must not already hold a transaction that each
attempt's `REQUIRED` method would join.
## Distributed Transactions (Saga Pattern)
A saga coordinates durable local steps; wrapping remote calls in `@Transactional`
does not implement one.
1. Commit the pending order, saga state and outgoing command in one local transaction.
2. Dispatch the command outside that transaction, using a stable provider idempotency key.
3. Persist each confirmed outcome and the next command atomically in another local transaction.
4. On rejection, persist failure state and a compensation command. Retry compensation
independently, and reconcile timeouts where the remote outcome is unknown.
Do not save failure state and then throw a rollback-triggering exception from the same
transaction: that erases the state. Recovery must resume from durable state after a crash.
Use the project's existing workflow mechanism; see
[messaging/outbox](../event-driven-messaging/SKILL.md) and
[idempotency](../idempotency-patterns/SKILL.md) for delivery and duplicate effects.
## Side Effects After Commit
For best-effort local notifications, a commit-bound listener prevents delivery on rollback.
For required delivery, persist an outbox entry with the business change or use the project's
durable publication mechanism. `AFTER_COMMIT` alone cannot recover a process crash or retry
a failed delivery.
```java
// Publisher — inside the TX
@Transactional
public Order place(UUID id) {
Order order = orderRepository.findById(id).orElseThrow();
order.place();
eventPublisher.publishEvent(new OrderPlaced(order.getId())); // published now; listener defers handling
return orderRepository.save(order);
}
// Listener — runs ONLY if the TX commits successfully
@TransactionalEventListener(phase = TransactionPhase.AFTER_COMMIT)
public void onOrderPlaced(OrderPlaced event) {
emailService.sendConfirmation(event.orderId()); // best effort; no durable retry
}
```
`AFTER_COMMIT` runs after the DB commits, but resources may still be bound to the completed
transaction. Delegate database writes to a separate `REQUIRES_NEW` bean. Listener failure
cannot undo the committed business write; make delivery failures observable and recoverable.
Without an active transaction the listener is skipped by default. `@Async` does not add
durable delivery. See [domain events](../domain-driven-design/SKILL.md).
## Verification
Test through Spring proxies and verify committed data from a new transaction. Cover checked
versus unchecked failures, inner rollback-only propagation, optimistic conflicts at commit,
audit rollback, and listener behavior after commit and rollback. Use the production database
engine for isolation and contention tests. A test-wide rollback can hide after-commit behavior.
## Gotchas
- Agent removes repository transaction annotations - keep the unit of work and existing Spring Data behavior.
- Agent treats AFTER_COMMIT as durable messaging - use an outbox or persistent publication registry for required delivery.
- Agent uses readOnly for replica routing or write protection - neither follows from the flag alone.
- Agent commits success audit entries with REQUIRES_NEW - commit them with the business mutation.
- Agent suppresses optimistic-lock rollback - retry in a fresh transaction.
- Agent calls `@Transactional` methods on `this` — self-invocation bypasses proxy
- Agent expects checked exceptions to rollback — must add `rollbackFor`
- Agent uses `@Transactional` on `private` methods — Spring proxy can't intercept
- Agent pulls in `spring-retry` for a new Boot 4 retry path - use core `@Retryable` and `@EnableResilientMethods`; preserve existing integrations when outside the task's scope.
- Agent relies on unspecified retry/transaction advisor ordering - verify every attempt gets a fresh transaction; a separate retry facade makes the boundary explicit.
## Official sources
- [Spring transaction propagation](https://docs.spring.io/spring-framework/reference/data-access/transaction/declarative/tx-propagation.html)
- [TransactionalEventListener lifecycle](https://docs.spring.io/spring-framework/docs/current/javadoc-api/org/springframework/transaction/event/TransactionalEventListener.html)
- [Jakarta Persistence optimistic-lock rollback semantics](https://jakarta.ee/specifications/persistence/3.2/apidocs/jakarta.persistence/jakarta/persistence/optimisticlockexception)