Blast radius analysis — what breaks if you change a symbol. Triggers: "impact analysis" | "what breaks if" | "blast radius" | "gitnexus impact" | "is it safe to change" | "dependencies of".
Scanned 9/23/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add Roxabi/roxabi-plugins --skill impact --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Impact?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/roxabi-impact)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: gitnexus-impact
argument-hint: '<symbol_name> [--direction upstream|downstream] [--depth N]'
description: Blast radius analysis — what breaks if you change a symbol. Triggers: "impact analysis" | "what breaks if" | "blast radius" | "gitnexus impact" | "is it safe to change" | "dependencies of".
version: 0.1.0
allowed-tools: Bash, Read
---
# GitNexus Impact
Blast radius analysis: find what breaks if you change a symbol. Essential before refactoring.
## Entry
```
/gitnexus-impact validateUser
/gitnexus-impact AuthService --direction downstream
/gitnexus-impact processOrder --depth 2
```
¬symbol → ask user provide a symbol name.
## Step 0 — Pre-flight
```bash
gitnexus status
```
¬indexed → ask user run `/gitnexus-analyze` first.
## Step 1 — Run Impact Analysis
```bash
gitnexus impact "$SYMBOL" $FLAGS
```
| Flag | Effect |
|------|--------|
| `--direction upstream` | Who depends on this (default) |
| `--direction downstream` | What this depends on |
| `--depth N` | Max relationship depth (default: 3) |
| `--include-tests` | Include test files |
| `--repo <name>` | Target specific repo |
## Step 2 — Parse JSON Output
```json
{
"target": "validateUser",
"direction": "upstream",
"callers": [
{
"name": "loginHandler",
"file": "src/auth/login.ts",
"line": 42,
"depth": 1,
"confidence": 1.0
}
],
"risk_level": "HIGH",
"affected_processes": ["LoginFlow", "TokenRefresh"],
"summary": {
"d1_count": 2,
"d2_count": 5,
"d3_count": 12
}
}
```
## Step 3 — Present Results
**Target:** `validateUser`
**Direction:** upstream (what depends on this)
**Risk Level:** HIGH
---
**Depth 1 — WILL BREAK (direct callers):**
| Symbol | File | Line |
|--------|------|------|
| loginHandler | src/auth/login.ts | 42 |
| apiMiddleware | src/api/middleware.ts | 15 |
**Depth 2 — LIKELY AFFECTED:**
| Symbol | File |
|--------|------|
| authRouter | src/routes/auth.ts |
| sessionManager | src/auth/session.ts |
**Depth 3 — MAY NEED TESTING:**
12 transitive dependencies...
---
**Affected Processes:** LoginFlow, TokenRefresh
## Step 4 — Risk Assessment
| Affected | Risk |
|----------|------|
| <5 symbols, few processes | LOW |
| 5-15 symbols, 2-5 processes | MEDIUM |
| >15 symbols or many processes | HIGH |
| Critical path (auth, payments) | CRITICAL |
**HIGH or CRITICAL risk →** warn user before proceeding with edits.
## Step 5 — Recommendation
- **LOW:** Safe to edit, verify tests pass
- **MEDIUM:** Review d=1 items, update them, run integration tests
- **HIGH:** Draft plan, update all d=1 callers, full test suite
- **CRITICAL:** Flag to user — may need broader coordination
$ARGUMENTS
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!