Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

Back to skills

Rca

ASecurity

Root cause analysis workflows - systematic investigation of failures

302 stars
0 votes
0 copies
0 views
Added 9/20/2026
devopsbashgitsecurity

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/20/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add rossoctl/rossoctl --skill rca --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Rca?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Rca
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/rossoctl-rca/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/rossoctl-rca)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download Zip
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: rca
description: Root cause analysis workflows - systematic investigation of failures
---

```mermaid
flowchart TD
    FAIL([Failure]) --> RCA{"/rca"}
    RCA -->|CI failure, no cluster| RCACI["rca:ci"]:::rca
    RCA -->|HyperShift available| RCAHS["rca:hypershift"]:::rca
    RCA -->|Kind available| RCAKIND["rca:kind"]:::rca

    RCACI -->|Inconclusive| NEED{"Need cluster?"}
    NEED -->|Yes| RCAHS
    NEED -->|Reproduce locally| RCAKIND

    RCACI --> ROOT[Root Cause Found]
    RCAHS --> ROOT
    RCAKIND --> ROOT
    ROOT --> TDD["tdd:*"]:::tdd

    classDef rca fill:#FF5722,stroke:#333,color:white
    classDef tdd fill:#4CAF50,stroke:#333,color:white
```

> Follow this diagram as the workflow.

# RCA Skills

Root cause analysis workflows for systematic failure investigation.

## Context-Safe Execution (MANDATORY)

**RCA is the highest-risk activity for context pollution.** Investigation involves
reading CI logs, kubectl output, and test results — all of which must stay out of
the main conversation context.

```bash
# Session-scoped log directory
export LOG_DIR="${LOG_DIR:-${WORKSPACE_DIR:-/tmp}/rossoctl-rca}"
mkdir -p "$LOG_DIR"
```

**Rules:**
1. **ALL diagnostic commands** redirect output to `$LOG_DIR/<name>.log`
2. **ALL log analysis** happens in subagents: `Task(subagent_type='Explore')`
3. The subagent reads the log, extracts findings, and returns a concise summary
4. The main context only sees: exit codes, OK/FAIL status, and subagent summaries
5. **NEVER** read CI logs, kubectl output, or test results directly in main context

## Auto-Select Sub-Skill

When this skill is invoked, determine the right sub-skill based on context:

### Step 1: Determine what's available

Check for HyperShift cluster:

```bash
ls ~/clusters/hcp/rossoctl-hypershift-custom-*/auth/kubeconfig 2>/dev/null
```

Check for Kind cluster:

```bash
kind get clusters 2>/dev/null
```

### Step 2: Route based on failure source and access

```
Where did the failure occur?
    │
    ├─ CI pipeline (GitHub Actions) ─────────────────────────┐
    │                                                         │
    │   Do you have a live cluster matching the CI env?       │
    │       │                                                 │
    │       ├─ HyperShift cluster available                   │
    │       │   → Use `rca:hypershift` (deep investigation)   │
    │       │                                                 │
    │       ├─ Kind cluster available (for Kind CI failures)  │
    │       │   → Use `rca:kind` (reproduce locally)          │
    │       │                                                 │
    │       └─ No cluster                                     │
    │           → Use `rca:ci` (logs and artifacts only)      │
    │           → If inconclusive, ask user to create cluster │
    │                                                         │
    ├─ Local Kind cluster ──────────────────────────────────┐ │
    │   → Use `rca:kind` (full local access)                │ │
    │                                                       │ │
    └─ HyperShift cluster ─────────────────────────────────┐│ │
        → Use `rca:hypershift` (full remote access)        ││ │
                                                           ││ │
After RCA is complete, switch to TDD for fix iteration: ◄──┘┘ │
    - `tdd:ci` (CI-only)                                       │
    - `tdd:hypershift` (live cluster)                          │
    - `tdd:kind` (local cluster)                               │
```

## Available Skills

| Skill | Access | Auto-approve | Best for |
|-------|--------|--------------|----------|
| `rca:ci` | CI logs/artifacts only | N/A | CI failures, no cluster |
| `rca:hypershift` | Full cluster access | All read ops | Deep investigation |
| `rca:kind` | Full local access | All ops | Kind failures, fast repro |

> **Concurrency limit**: Only one `rca:kind` session at a time (one Kind cluster fits locally).
> Before routing to `rca:kind`, run `kind get clusters` — if a cluster exists from another session,
> route to `rca:ci` instead or ask the user.

## CVE Awareness

All RCA variants include a CVE check before publishing findings. If the root
cause involves a dependency issue, `cve:scan` runs automatically to check for
known CVEs. If found, `cve:brainstorm` blocks public disclosure until the CVE
is properly reported through the project's security channels.

See `cve:scan` and `cve:brainstorm` for details.

## Related Skills

- `tdd:ci` - Fix iteration after RCA (CI-driven)
- `tdd:hypershift` - Fix iteration with live cluster
- `tdd:kind` - Fix iteration on Kind
- `k8s:logs` - Query and analyze component logs
- `k8s:pods` - Debug pod issues
- `cve:scan` - CVE scanning gate
- `cve:brainstorm` - CVE disclosure planning

Attribution

rossoctlrossoctl
View sourceMore from rossoctl →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Your tool, in front of Claude Code builders.

3 founder slots · $299/mo · GSC-verified traffic · sponsors can never buy grades.

See placements

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Your tool, in front of Claude Code builders.

3 founder slots · $299/mo · GSC-verified traffic · sponsors can never buy grades.

See placements

Related Skills

Terraform Module Library

Build reusable Terraform modules for AWS, Azure, and GCP infrastructure following infrastructure-as-code best practices. Use when creating infrastructure modules, standardizing cloud provisioning, or implementing reusable IaC components.

393431 votes

sematext-otel

Wire a service's OpenTelemetry output to Sematext Cloud. Walks through region, App-type, instrumentation flow (managed OTLP endpoint vs Sematext Agent), and signal selection (traces/metrics/logs), then produces the exact env-var block and points at a runnable reference example in this repo. Invoke when instrumenting a new app for Sematext.

01 votes

Deployment Patterns

Deployment workflows, CI/CD pipeline patterns, Docker containerization, health checks, rollback strategies, and production readiness checklists for web applications. Use when setting up deployment infrastructure or planning releases.

2459130 votes

Babysit

Watch a pull request or review cycle until it is ready to merge. Use when asked to babysit, monitor, or keep checking PR comments, reviews, and CI until all actionable issues are resolved.

929660 votes

V7 Roster

Interact with the Paperclip control plane API for task coordination and governance. Use when checking assignments, updating issue status, posting comments, delegating work, managing routines, or calling Paperclip API endpoints.

805540 votes
View all in devops →