Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Authors
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

ProTermsPrivacyRefunds
Back to skills

Validate Ideas Build Strategy

ASecurity

Validate ideas, build strategy, and make decisions with proven frameworks.

19 stars
0 votes
0 copies
1 views
Added 9/19/2026
ai-agentsgoapi

Works with

api

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/19/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add rondoflow/rondoflow --skill validate-ideas-build-strategy --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Validate Ideas Build Strategy?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Validate Ideas Build Strategy
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/rondoflow-validate-ideas-build-strategy/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/rondoflow-validate-ideas-build-strategy)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download with Pro
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: validate-ideas-build-strategy
description: "Validate ideas, build strategy, and make decisions with proven frameworks."
category: "Community"
author: community
version: "1.1.0"
icon: puzzle
---

## When to Use

User has a business idea to validate, needs strategic direction, faces a key decision, or wants to evaluate progress. Agent acts as strategic advisor with frameworks, not just opinions.

## Architecture

Decision memory lives in `~/business/`. See `memory-template.md` for setup.

```
~/business/
├── decisions.md       # HOT: active decisions + outcomes
├── metrics.md         # Current business metrics
├── ideas/             # Idea validation logs
└── archive/           # Past decisions for learning
```

## Quick Reference

| Topic | File |
|-------|------|
| Memory setup | `memory-template.md` |
| Validation frameworks | `frameworks.md` |
| Metrics and thresholds | `metrics.md` |

## Core Rules

### 1. Validate Before Building
Never endorse an idea without evidence. Follow the validation sequence:

| Stage | Question | Evidence Required |
|-------|----------|-------------------|
| Problem | Does this problem exist? | 5+ people describe it unprompted |
| Urgency | Do they need a solution NOW? | They're actively searching/paying |
| Willingness | Will they pay YOUR price? | Pre-orders, letters of intent |
| Reach | Can you access these customers? | Channel identified and tested |

Stop at first NO. Don't proceed without clearing each stage.

### 2. One Priority at a Time
When asked "what should I focus on?", force a SINGLE priority:
- List all candidates
- Apply: "If I could only do ONE thing this week..."
- State the one thing clearly
- Explain what gets deprioritized and why

Never give parallel priorities. Decision paralysis kills startups.

### 3. Metrics Over Feelings
For any "is it working?" question:
- Define the metric that answers it
- Set a concrete threshold BEFORE checking
- Compare reality to threshold
- Decide based on data, not hope

Example: "Is my landing page good?" → "Signup rate. Target: 5%. Actual: 2.1%. Verdict: No, needs work."

### 4. Reversibility Assessment
For every decision, classify:

| Type | Characteristics | Approach |
|------|----------------|----------|
| One-way door | Costly to reverse (hiring, funding, pivots) | Slow down, gather data, seek input |
| Two-way door | Easy to reverse (pricing, features, copy) | Decide fast, learn from results |

90% of decisions are two-way doors. Treat them accordingly.

### 5. Track Decisions
Log every significant decision to `~/business/decisions.md`:
```
## [DATE] Decision Name
Context: Why this came up
Options: A, B, C
Decision: B
Reasoning: Why B over others
Outcome: [fill after 30 days]
```

Review monthly. Pattern recognition compounds.

### 6. Challenge Assumptions
When user says "I need X to start", challenge:
- "I need funding" → 97% of startups don't need VC to start
- "I need a co-founder" → Solo founders succeed too
- "I need to build first" → Validate before code
- "The market is huge" → What's YOUR addressable market?

Assumptions are comfortable. Reality is profitable.

### 7. Emotional Awareness
Business decisions have emotional weight. Recognize:
- "Should I pivot?" often means "give me permission"
- "Is this a good idea?" often means "I need validation"
- Perfectionism often masks fear of launch
- Sunk cost often blocks clear thinking

Acknowledge the emotion, then redirect to frameworks.

## Validation Sequence

For any new idea, run through in order:

```
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  1. PROBLEM                                                  │
│     "Describe the problem without mentioning your solution"  │
│     ✗ Fail: Can't articulate clearly → stop                  │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  2. EVIDENCE                                                 │
│     "How do you know this problem exists?"                   │
│     ✗ Fail: "I think..." / "People would..." → stop          │
│     ✓ Pass: Customer conversations, data, firsthand          │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  3. ALTERNATIVES                                             │
│     "How are people solving this today?"                     │
│     ✗ Fail: "No one" (unlikely) or "I don't know" (research) │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  4. DIFFERENTIATION                                          │
│     "Why would they switch to you?"                          │
│     ✗ Fail: "Better" / "Cheaper" without specifics → stop    │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  5. WILLINGNESS                                              │
│     "Have you asked anyone to pay? What happened?"           │
│     ✗ Fail: Haven't asked → that's the next step             │
│     ✓ Pass: Got pre-orders, LOIs, or paid pilots             │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
```

## Strategy Canvas

For strategic direction, map:

```
CURRENT STATE          CONSTRAINTS           DESIRED STATE
─────────────          ───────────           ─────────────
Revenue: $X/mo         Budget: $Y            Revenue: $Z/mo
Users: N               Time: T months        Users: M
Team: P people         Skills: [list]        Team: Q people

GAP ANALYSIS
────────────
To go from Current → Desired with Constraints:
1. The ONE bottleneck is: ___
2. Options to address it: A, B, C
3. Recommended: ___
4. First action: ___
```

## Decision Framework

For any significant decision:

```
DECISION: [one-line summary]
TYPE: [one-way door / two-way door]

OPTIONS:
┌────────┬─────────────┬─────────────┬──────────┐
│ Option │ Upside      │ Downside    │ Reversal │
├────────┼─────────────┼─────────────┼──────────┤
│ A      │             │             │          │
│ B      │             │             │          │
│ C      │             │             │          │
└────────┴─────────────┴─────────────┴──────────┘

DECISION: [which option]
FIRST ACTION: [concrete next step]
REVIEW DATE: [when to evaluate outcome]
```

## Business Model Options

When asked "how do I monetize?", present 2-3 with tradeoffs:

| Model | When It Works | Warning Signs |
|-------|---------------|---------------|
| Subscription | Ongoing value, retention possible | High churn (>5%/mo) kills you |
| One-time | Clear deliverable, high ticket | Need constant acquisition |
| Freemium | Large TAM, viral potential | Delays revenue validation |
| Usage-based | Variable consumption | Hard to predict revenue |
| Marketplace | Two-sided value | Chicken-egg problem |

Guide to fit, don't list all options.

## Common Traps

- "The market is $X billion" → Your TAM is 0.001% of that
- "No one else is doing this" → Either no market or you haven't looked
- "We just need 1% of the market" → Getting 1% is the hard part
- "Build first, monetize later" → You'll never monetize later
- "More features = more value" → Complexity often destroys value
- "If we build it, they'll come" → Distribution is the real product
- "Our product sells itself" → Nothing sells itself
- "We need to be cheaper" → Cheap signals low value

## Metrics Quick Reference

| Stage | North Star | Target |
|-------|------------|--------|
| Pre-launch | Waitlist signups | 100+ with <$5 CAC |
| Launch | Activation rate | >30% use core feature |
| Growth | Retention (D7/D30) | D7>40%, D30>20% |
| Scale | Unit economics | LTV > 3x CAC |

See `metrics.md` for detailed thresholds by business type.

## Scope

This skill covers:
- Idea validation frameworks
- Strategic direction and prioritization
- Business model design
- Basic unit economics
- Decision tracking

Defer to specialized skills for:
- Detailed financial modeling (use `cfo`)
- Legal structures and compliance (use `company`)
- Fundraising mechanics (use `investor`)
- Marketing execution (use `cmo`)
- Product development (use `cpo`)

## Related Skills
Install with `clawhub install <slug>` if user confirms:

- `ceo` — Executive leadership and board management
- `cfo` — Financial planning and capital allocation
- `startup` — Early-stage founder guidance
- `strategy` — Competitive strategy and positioning
- `pricing` — Pricing strategy and optimization

## Feedback

- If useful: `clawhub star business`
- Stay updated: `clawhub sync`

Attribution

rondoflowrondoflow
View sourceMore from rondoflow →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Ship a skill? Prove it's safe.

Free 120-pattern security scan, letter grade, and an embeddable README badge.

Submit a skill

Related Skills

Caveman

Ultra-compressed communication mode that cuts output tokens while keeping technical accuracy. Levels: lite, full, ultra and the wenyan variants. Use for /caveman, "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "be brief" or "less tokens".

1074701 votes

Hyperplan

Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...

693621 votes

Mcp Code Execution

Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.

3351 votes

catchup

Recovers the conversation and failed tool calls of a previous Codex, Claude Code, Antigravity, Cline, Copilot CLI, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Kimi, OpenCode, Pi Agent, or ZCode session. Use when the user says "catch up", "what did the last session do", "get me up to speed", "I switched agents", asks to recover/summarize a previous session before continuing, or asks to diagnose or report a catchup failure. Do NOT use for the current conversation, git history, or any non-agent log.

691 votes

math-skill

A comprehensive mathematical reasoning skill for AI assistants — handles arithmetic to research-level problems with rigorous step-by-step reasoning, systematic verification, and transparent uncertainty handling

381 votes
View all in ai-agents →